Ron
June 30th 03, 05:48 AM
"Fern5827" > wrote in message
...
> Neighboring Illinois places 36% of children with relatives, while Missouri
only
> places 24% of children with family placements.
Neighboring Illinois has a higher per-capita income that that of the
residents of Missouri. Not to mention diffreent laws.
> Subject: Mo fosters have criminal bkgrnd check, fingerprints, too
> From: (Fern5827)
> Date: 6/28/2003 10:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time
> Message-id: >
>
> Panel issues final report on Missouri foster care system
> By Paul Sloca
> Associated Press Writer
> 06/13/2003
>
>
> JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) -- A new report backs efforts by Missouri
lawmakers to
> expand criminal background checks for potential foster parents but
recommends
> against opening all child abuse and neglect cases to the public.
>
> The final report by the Commission on Children's Justice was released
Thursday
> -- several weeks after the Legislature passed a bill overhauling the
state's
> child welfare system. The legislation is pending before Gov. Bob Holden.
>
> Both the legislation and creation of the commission were prompted by last
> August's death of 2-year-old Dominic James of Springfield.
>
> Dominic was removed from his mother after a domestic dispute and placed
with a
> foster family, where he remained even after his biological father and
others
> expressed concern that he showed signs of abuse. Dominic's foster father,
John
> Dilley of Willard, has pleaded innocent to charges of abuse and murder.
>
> The commission's report recommends that potential foster parents be
subject to
> FBI fingerprint checks and a search of civil court records -- two measures
that
> are included in the legislation. But such adults should not have to pay
for the
> checks, the report said.
>
> Some legislators have suggested that a background check might have
prevented
> Dominic's placement with Dilley, who had been subject at least once to a
civil
> restraining order.
Gee, a civil restraining order. That would remove about 20% of the
population of the country. Even I have had a civil restraining order,
restraining me from operating a home daycare in a residential area because
it may have violated the Declaration of Protective Covenants, in another
state. But according to this article this would have been enough to deny me
a foster care license.
Yeah, that makes sense.
> In addition, the commission recommended that the state Division of Family
> Services -- which runs the foster care system -- should be required to
allow a
> parent and child to visit within 24 to 48 hours after the child is removed
from
> the home unless a visit could put the child in danger.
This begs the question, "Why?". What is the reasoning?
> Further, the commission recommended that open hearings in child welfare
cases
> be tested as pilot projects for two years in St. Louis city, Greene and
Cole
> counties and two rural counties to be selected by the chief justice of the
> Missouri Supreme Court.
>
> But the commission also recommended that all records in child abuse and
neglect
> cases remain closed to the public. The bill passed by the Legislature
makes
> most court proceedings and records in such cases open to the public.
>
> House Speaker Catherine Hanaway, who sponsored the bill and served on the
> commission, had originally proposed open court pilot projects but changed
the
> legislation as the bill moved through the process.
>
> ``We should go to a statewide opening of records,'' Hanaway, R-Warson
Woods,
> said Friday.
>
> Legislators and the commission were in agreement that the state should
make
> more use of private contractors to serve children and families.
>
> Made up of people from all branches of government and the private sector,
the
> commission has been gathering information from other states and child
advocacy
> groups since it was formed in January.
Does it have any foster parents on the commission?
> The director of the Department of Social Services, which oversees the
Division
> of Family Services, called the new report a valuable tool.
>
> ``I will using it as a blueprint to try and improve our child welfare
system in
> Missouri,'' said Steve Roling, who was appointed after Katherine Martin
> resigned as director two months ago. He noted that the report ``talks
about
> solutions and doesn't go looking for blame,'' Roling said.
A novel concept. Most look to lay blame and not fix the problems.
> The commission, while noting the current state budget crisis, said its
> recommendations were made without considering the money shortage.
Figures. SO, another new tax on the people of Missouri? Or is this just
another commission to make a report that can never be used?
> ``I think it's the kind of thing where the commission will be throwing the
> rocks in the water and hopefully the ripple effects will be picked up by
the
> judges and the workers,'' said commission member Betty Sims, a former
state
> senator who now is involved with child advocacy groups.
>
> The commission also urged stronger efforts to place foster children with
> relatives. While Missouri law gives families preference in foster care
cases,
> just 24 percent of placements occur that way. By comparison, 36 percent of
> Illinois foster children are placed with relatives.
Another figure that begs the question, "Why?". But then again I think I
have already answered that one. But there are other possibilities, like
Missouri is known as the "Show Me" state. Maybe the relatives have already
seen enough and want nothing to do with their relatives. Happens more often
that you think.
Ron
...
> Neighboring Illinois places 36% of children with relatives, while Missouri
only
> places 24% of children with family placements.
Neighboring Illinois has a higher per-capita income that that of the
residents of Missouri. Not to mention diffreent laws.
> Subject: Mo fosters have criminal bkgrnd check, fingerprints, too
> From: (Fern5827)
> Date: 6/28/2003 10:37 AM Eastern Daylight Time
> Message-id: >
>
> Panel issues final report on Missouri foster care system
> By Paul Sloca
> Associated Press Writer
> 06/13/2003
>
>
> JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. (AP) -- A new report backs efforts by Missouri
lawmakers to
> expand criminal background checks for potential foster parents but
recommends
> against opening all child abuse and neglect cases to the public.
>
> The final report by the Commission on Children's Justice was released
Thursday
> -- several weeks after the Legislature passed a bill overhauling the
state's
> child welfare system. The legislation is pending before Gov. Bob Holden.
>
> Both the legislation and creation of the commission were prompted by last
> August's death of 2-year-old Dominic James of Springfield.
>
> Dominic was removed from his mother after a domestic dispute and placed
with a
> foster family, where he remained even after his biological father and
others
> expressed concern that he showed signs of abuse. Dominic's foster father,
John
> Dilley of Willard, has pleaded innocent to charges of abuse and murder.
>
> The commission's report recommends that potential foster parents be
subject to
> FBI fingerprint checks and a search of civil court records -- two measures
that
> are included in the legislation. But such adults should not have to pay
for the
> checks, the report said.
>
> Some legislators have suggested that a background check might have
prevented
> Dominic's placement with Dilley, who had been subject at least once to a
civil
> restraining order.
Gee, a civil restraining order. That would remove about 20% of the
population of the country. Even I have had a civil restraining order,
restraining me from operating a home daycare in a residential area because
it may have violated the Declaration of Protective Covenants, in another
state. But according to this article this would have been enough to deny me
a foster care license.
Yeah, that makes sense.
> In addition, the commission recommended that the state Division of Family
> Services -- which runs the foster care system -- should be required to
allow a
> parent and child to visit within 24 to 48 hours after the child is removed
from
> the home unless a visit could put the child in danger.
This begs the question, "Why?". What is the reasoning?
> Further, the commission recommended that open hearings in child welfare
cases
> be tested as pilot projects for two years in St. Louis city, Greene and
Cole
> counties and two rural counties to be selected by the chief justice of the
> Missouri Supreme Court.
>
> But the commission also recommended that all records in child abuse and
neglect
> cases remain closed to the public. The bill passed by the Legislature
makes
> most court proceedings and records in such cases open to the public.
>
> House Speaker Catherine Hanaway, who sponsored the bill and served on the
> commission, had originally proposed open court pilot projects but changed
the
> legislation as the bill moved through the process.
>
> ``We should go to a statewide opening of records,'' Hanaway, R-Warson
Woods,
> said Friday.
>
> Legislators and the commission were in agreement that the state should
make
> more use of private contractors to serve children and families.
>
> Made up of people from all branches of government and the private sector,
the
> commission has been gathering information from other states and child
advocacy
> groups since it was formed in January.
Does it have any foster parents on the commission?
> The director of the Department of Social Services, which oversees the
Division
> of Family Services, called the new report a valuable tool.
>
> ``I will using it as a blueprint to try and improve our child welfare
system in
> Missouri,'' said Steve Roling, who was appointed after Katherine Martin
> resigned as director two months ago. He noted that the report ``talks
about
> solutions and doesn't go looking for blame,'' Roling said.
A novel concept. Most look to lay blame and not fix the problems.
> The commission, while noting the current state budget crisis, said its
> recommendations were made without considering the money shortage.
Figures. SO, another new tax on the people of Missouri? Or is this just
another commission to make a report that can never be used?
> ``I think it's the kind of thing where the commission will be throwing the
> rocks in the water and hopefully the ripple effects will be picked up by
the
> judges and the workers,'' said commission member Betty Sims, a former
state
> senator who now is involved with child advocacy groups.
>
> The commission also urged stronger efforts to place foster children with
> relatives. While Missouri law gives families preference in foster care
cases,
> just 24 percent of placements occur that way. By comparison, 36 percent of
> Illinois foster children are placed with relatives.
Another figure that begs the question, "Why?". But then again I think I
have already answered that one. But there are other possibilities, like
Missouri is known as the "Show Me" state. Maybe the relatives have already
seen enough and want nothing to do with their relatives. Happens more often
that you think.
Ron