PDA

View Full Version : Re: WHAT IS CHILD SUPPORT FOR?


gini52
September 11th 03, 02:00 PM
"teachrmama" > wrote
> "gini52" > wrote
> >
> > "teachrmama" > wrote
> > >
> > > "PapaPolarbear" > wrote
....................................
> > > > This is an example. It's your example simplified actually. You're
> > useless
> > > at
> > > > debating and rationalizing and appear an idiot for your
comprehension
> > in
> > > > absolutes. I really hope you don't go to court with your husband,
> you'd
> > be
> > > > an embarrasment.
> > >
> > > And YOU are a damn fool. You sit there seeing yourself as this
ultimate
> > > voice of reason, and can't even see that you present NOTHING of use to
> > > change the system. You eventually agree that the system is wrong and
> needs
> > > to be changed, but insist that all NCPs be sucked through the system
> > anyway,
> > > unless they can convince their CP to agree to stay out of it. (Which
> > still
> > > won't work in many cases.) So, Great Sage, how is it you think the
> system
> > > should be changed? Maybe I have just missed how to do this. Point by
> > > point, tell us the steps to take to change the system that you find so
> > > necessary.
> > ==
> > Hehe....He can't do it, TM. Remeber his first posts here--he was
> chastizing
> > us for being whiners and not
> > changing the system and then demanded that we tell him how to do it
> because
> > he doesn't know how to do it.
> > (That was about his most intellectual post ;-)
> > ==
> > ==
>
> So, Gini, what do you think PPB would do if he were a judge in the family
> court system?
==
Hmmm....Let's see. He hasn't a clue how the system works, can't comprehend
the fundamentals of family law, thinks kids are irrelevant, thinks the
state is a better decision-making entity than parents--Yep, he's qualified
to be a family court judge alright.
==
>Think he'd still consider our children to be irrelevant?
==
Of course. But, he isn't selective when it comes to making kids
irrelevent--he disregards
them all. (Strikingly similar to Clark, BTW--I think there's an 80+% we have
a male Crystal in
our midst. If I gave a damn, I'd sleuth it but, I don't so I won't)
==
>Or
> would his wisdom heal the entire system as oil on troubled waters?
==
He doesn't know how to heal the system, remember? He's bitching at us
because
we don't heal it ;)
==
==

gini52
September 11th 03, 02:00 PM
"teachrmama" > wrote
> "gini52" > wrote
> >
> > "teachrmama" > wrote
> > >
> > > "PapaPolarbear" > wrote
....................................
> > > > This is an example. It's your example simplified actually. You're
> > useless
> > > at
> > > > debating and rationalizing and appear an idiot for your
comprehension
> > in
> > > > absolutes. I really hope you don't go to court with your husband,
> you'd
> > be
> > > > an embarrasment.
> > >
> > > And YOU are a damn fool. You sit there seeing yourself as this
ultimate
> > > voice of reason, and can't even see that you present NOTHING of use to
> > > change the system. You eventually agree that the system is wrong and
> needs
> > > to be changed, but insist that all NCPs be sucked through the system
> > anyway,
> > > unless they can convince their CP to agree to stay out of it. (Which
> > still
> > > won't work in many cases.) So, Great Sage, how is it you think the
> system
> > > should be changed? Maybe I have just missed how to do this. Point by
> > > point, tell us the steps to take to change the system that you find so
> > > necessary.
> > ==
> > Hehe....He can't do it, TM. Remeber his first posts here--he was
> chastizing
> > us for being whiners and not
> > changing the system and then demanded that we tell him how to do it
> because
> > he doesn't know how to do it.
> > (That was about his most intellectual post ;-)
> > ==
> > ==
>
> So, Gini, what do you think PPB would do if he were a judge in the family
> court system?
==
Hmmm....Let's see. He hasn't a clue how the system works, can't comprehend
the fundamentals of family law, thinks kids are irrelevant, thinks the
state is a better decision-making entity than parents--Yep, he's qualified
to be a family court judge alright.
==
>Think he'd still consider our children to be irrelevant?
==
Of course. But, he isn't selective when it comes to making kids
irrelevent--he disregards
them all. (Strikingly similar to Clark, BTW--I think there's an 80+% we have
a male Crystal in
our midst. If I gave a damn, I'd sleuth it but, I don't so I won't)
==
>Or
> would his wisdom heal the entire system as oil on troubled waters?
==
He doesn't know how to heal the system, remember? He's bitching at us
because
we don't heal it ;)
==
==