"Child support" is unconstitutional

[Chris]

"Child support", by its very nature, is unconstitutional since it does not
offer equal protection under the law.

[C]

How does one equate Child Support to some sort of protection.

"Chris" > wrote in message
news:EgyUc.112347$sh.87170@fed1read06...
> "Child support", by its very nature, is unconstitutional since it does not
> offer equal protection under the law.
>
>

[Chris]

"C" > wrote in message
. ..
> How does one equate Child Support to some sort of protection.

The law is supposed to be designed to protect everyone equally. The "child
support" laws are designed to attack some folks but not others; hence the
lack of EQUAL protection.

>
> "Chris" > wrote in message
> news:EgyUc.112347$sh.87170@fed1read06...
> > "Child support", by its very nature, is unconstitutional since it does
not
> > offer equal protection under the law.
> >
> >
>
>