svanier
July 7th 03, 10:24 AM
Ed Conrad wrote:
> =======================================
>
>
>>MAN AS OLD AS COAL
>
>
> As you all know by now, truth no longer is playing second fiddle
> to the fiction, fantasy and fairy tales that have been dished out
> for more than a century about man's origin and ancestry.
> <
> Finally, it's the official end of the deceit, deception, collusion and
> conspiracy that has long been perpetrated by arrogant, egotistical
> members of the Scientific Establshment in and out of its hallowed
> Halls of Learning.
*********SPV.....What about Religious Establishment?
> <
> Their monumental hoax on mankind has met its match with the
> presentation of undeniable physical evidence that, multi-millions of
> years ago, the good earth wasn't anything like what has long
> been depicted by the scientific community.
> <
> For one thing, man -- in almost our present form -- existed while
> coal was being formed, and our ancestors lived alongside
> giant scorpions, dinosaurs and beasts with six-inch-high canine
> teeth.
> <
> And man and animals had one thing in common. Both were
> annihilated in some incredible catastrophe that blew them limb
> from limb and scattered their bones, teeth and soft organs
> in all directions..
> <
> What happened next is a testament to the late, great Immanuel
> Velikovsky who, more than a half-century ago, said the true story
> of earth's -- and man's -- past is written in the rocks, visible for
> all to see as part of the fossil record.
> <
> Eons ago -- before coal hardened -- some sort of fluid engulfed the
> bones, teeth and soft organs just after the great catastrophe, causing
> them to petrifiy and now offer a mindboggling horror story of
> mankind's distant past.
> <
> That man existed during the Carboniferous Period also offers
> proof that we could not possibly have evolved as suggested
> by the Darwin Theory.
> <
> Rightly so, because the theory of the evolution of man never
> possessed a shred of physical evidence in the first place.
> Man could not -- and did not -- become such a magnificent machine
> by a series of incredible accidents of nature since it's an
> astronomical mathematical absurdity.
> <
> Even Charles Darwin had a sneaky suspicion his theory was full
> of hot air.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/truth/tosuppose.gif
>
> <
> And Earnest Hooton, longtime professor of anthropology at Harvard
> University, seconded the motion years later in his book, "Apes, Men
> and Morons," citing the absence of undeniable physical evidence.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-013S.JPG
>
> <
> But, since we were spoon-fed such pablum -- the evolution of man --
> by members of the omniscient Scientific Establishment, most of us
> ate up every word. These pompous asses were neither to be
> questioned nor challenged.
> <
> About a year after finding my first specimen of petrified bone between
> coal veins in June 1981, I couldn't believe the incedible resistence
> I was encountering in my pursuit of honest investigation.
> <
> My longtime friend, Clayton Lennon (1900-1996), warned me it
> wouldn't be easy and one day, between puffs of his cigar,
> summed up my despair quite eloquently .
> <
>
>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/edyournot.gif
>
> <
> Meanwhile, as their noses continued to grow, so also did the
> arrogance of members of the Scientific Establishment who had
> long lost the goal of a search for truth. The only important thing
> to them, I soon learned, was to make no waves and concentrate
> on protecting their vested interests.
> <
> Over time, they had become incredibly ruthless and bold, really
> believing that -- as members of omnipotent Acadamia -- they could
> do anything they damn well pleased and answer to no one..
> <
> Since I have had a ringside seat over these past 22 years, I assure
> you that it has included not only denial of physical evidence that
> could -- would -- destroy the theory of the evolution of man but
> actually tampering with that evidence -- and I have come right out
> and named names.
> <
> Then, with brass testacles, the criminals were actually belitting
> the victim, with character assassination leveled like a Gatling gun.
> <
> And even worse, the assault on truth was adamantly defended by
> their colleagues.
> <
> Fortunately, for your grandchildren and mine, that day is over.
> The pseudoscientists' day of reckoning has finally arrived.
> <
> But it comes as no surprise. After all, they had been forewarned:
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/canals/hooton.gif
>
> <
> ==================================================
> <
> TRUTH FINALLY CATCHES UP TO THE PERPETRATORS
> OF DECEIT, DECEPTION, COLLUSION AND CONSPIRACY
> <
> ================================================== =
> <
>
>>> MAN AS OLD AS COAL
>>> All Specimens Found Between Anthracite Veins
>
> <
> (Strata geologically dated at a minimum of 280 million years)
> <
> Here are just a few of the thousands upon thousands of specimens
> of petrified bones, teeth and/or even soft organs -- some human --
> that I have discovered between two separate anthracite veins
> in Northeastern Pennsylvania over the past 22 years.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z5gall.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z9lung.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/pp/MVC-022S.JPG
>
> <
> Strange, according to scientific doctrine, they couldn't possibly
> have been found in Carboniferous strata, dated at a minimum
> of 280 million years.
> <
> You see, every scientific textbook insists that no large land
> animals, let alone man, existed back then. Hell, man wouldn't begin
> evolving until multi-millions of years later, the pseudos proclaimed.
> <
> But the incredible arsenal of petrified bones, teeth and even soft
> organs proves -- beyond doubt -- that man and large land animals
> indeed had been around when coal was being formed. Otherwise,
> their mortal remains could not have been preserved between layers
> of anthracite as the result of a catastrophe beyond our wildest
> imagination.
> <
> And, since this is the grim evidence that a catastrophe happened
> before, there is NO question that it could happen again.
> <
> Velikovsky provided evidence of catastrophes in his two books,
> "Worlds in Collision" and "Earth in Upheaval," published back
> in the early 1950s. In them, he offered undeniable evidence of
> calamities beyond human comprehension but was ridiculed
> and badmouthed by members of the Scientific Establishment.
> <
> Here's a copy of these two books, in paperback, and an explanation
> why Velikovsky was treated with scorn and contempt, which is how
> members of the Scientific Establishment have treated me for the last
> 21 1/2 years.
> <
>
>>>================================================== ==
>
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/ebay/Petrifiedx/MVC-010S.JPG
>>>http://edconrad.com/ebay/Petrifiedx/MVC-011S.JPG
>
> <
> More Velikvosky:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-014S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-008S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>================================================== ==
>
> <
> A longtime newspaperman, I figured -- when realizing I was getting
> the shaft from the Scientific Establishment -- I'd get a fair shake
> from newspapers in an effort to tell my story.
> <
> I thought the editors would be genuinely interested in what might've
> sounded like a farfetched story, except that it was backed up by
> petrified bones, teeth and soft organs as old as coal.
> <
> Reporters from the Allentown (Pa.) Call-Chronicle and Las Vegas
> Sun, to mention just two, were greatly impressed. But when their
> stories appeared in print, it took my breath away. The articles were
> completely negative, making me look like that proverbial horse's
> ass.
> <
> Naturally, there was nothing I could do about it, so I had to give up
> on newspapers completely. I had long known the New York Times,
> Washington Post and Philadelphia Inquirer wouldn't touch it because
> they had several opportunities to do so but bowed to their vested
> interests and ignored me.
> <
> Ditto for the TV network news shows like "60 Minutes."
> <
> For the longest time, it appeared the world would never know the truth
> about the catastrophe that decimated both man and animal while coal
> was being formed.
> <
> Then a miracle happened -- along came the Internet. It gave me a way
> to reach the pubic but, of course, the public wasn't paying attention
> because members of the Scientific Establishment kept making me
> look like a fool and an imbecile.
> <
> And, if you recall, they had been doing a mighty fine job of it
> right up until yesterday. That's when members of the Scientific
> Establishment got the second biggest shock of their lives, dwarfed
> only by the attack on the Twin Towers.
> <
> Suddenly overnight, with the presentation of an arsenal of physical
> evidence, the ridicule and character assassination have eased
> somewhat.
> <
> Suddenly, their cannons ran out of ammunition, accusations that
> I'm a liar and a fraud.
> <
> Suddenly, these Clown Princes of Sciences -- long having made
> a joke at the expense of sacred Science -- finally realized that
> their involvement in deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy
> has caught up with them.
> <
> These Omniscient Buffoons have defended their colleagues
> who, with incredible audacity, have made a mockery of physical
> evidence, totally ignoring it and sometimes even tampering with it.
> <
> Thomas Alva Edison probably put in a nutshell what they were
> doing for so long, and my dear friend Clayton was right on target,
> too.
> <
>
>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/quotesnew.gif
>
> <
> ===========================================
>
>>========= SOME OF THE SPECIMENS =========
>
> ===========================================
> <
>
>>THE VERY FIRST DISCOVERY
>
> <
> The following is the very first discovery of petrified bone in
> coal-bearing Carboniferous strata in June 1981.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/first.jpg
>
> <
> The specimen, which I found by accident, resembled a giant skull
> and the Smithsonian expressed an interest after receiving a photo,
> inviting me to bring it down to Washington so it could be examined
> firsthand.
> <
> Three of its "experts" -- an anthropologist, a paleontologist and a
> geologist -- looked it over carefully but, after a few minutes,
> concurred that it was nothing more than a rock or concretion,
> certainly nothng that had ever lived.
> <
> No one mentioned that a microscopic study of the specimen's
> cellular structure would accurately identify whether it is or is not
> bone. (I had no knowledge of this fact at the time and wouldn't
> be aware of it until many months later)
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/textbook.gif
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/thefactthat.gif
>
> <
> In any event, while preparing to leave the Smithsonian, I politely
> asked if they would want to keep the specimen, perhaps to break
> apart the jaw-like area to see if teeth could be found inside. The
> three "experts" -- Joseph Brown and Robert McCurdy, the only
> two names I remember -- laughed at me and said it would be
> an absolute waste of their time.
> <
> About a month later -- rather discouraged -- I decided to search
> the interior of the jaw-like area on my own. It began with a nail
> to penetrate the rock hardness, then using all sorts of small tools
> to reach inside and, strangely, begin pulling out what resembled
> brownish dirt.
> <
> I was mysified that some sort of cavity existed and contacted
> the Smithsonian about this -- but was ignored.
> <
> After several weeks of part-time labor, I found a pair of peculiar
> objects inside. Photos were taken, greatly enlarged and sent to
> Krogman, the bone expert.
> <
> Our friendship had begun months previous when I had driven
> to Lancaster to show him the first strange sPecimen I had found
> that had come from between coal veins -- the large skull that
> the Smithsonian later dismissed as a rock.
> <
> Krogman studied the photo of the inclusion and then told me over
> the phone that the object is definitely a premolar tooth because
> "I can see a pair of cusps."
> <
> Here's the photo that Krogman had examined, with the dime
> offering an indication of size.
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-014S.JPG
>
> <
> The photo below shows another view of where the premolar was
> attached.
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/z1.jpg
>
> <
> Krogman suggested an infrared scan be performed and it was done
> at American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va. Here's the result
> of the test:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/graph.gif
>
> <
> This is what the laboratory stated in its official report:
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/result.gif
>
> <
> It meant that the inclusion in the jaw-like area was neither rock
> nor concretion but something that once lived.
> <
> When the scan was interpreted later, this fact was confirmed.
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/compatible.gif
>
> <
> It also should be emphasized that microscopic study of the
> skull-like object was conducted and Haversian canals -- miniscule
> circles, the tell-tale sign of bone -- were visible.
> <
> It had prompted Krogman, at one point, to offer great encourgement,
> as he followed the discoveries with great interest.:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/krogquote.gif
>
> <
>
>>>============================================
>>>PETRIFIED HUMAN SKULL
>
> <
> The following specimen was identified by Krogman as a petrified
> human calvarium -- a skull with the eyesockets broken off -- after
> he personally had examined it and even measured it with
> caliphers, expressing pleasure with the results..
> <
> Krogman, who was personally invited by the Egyptian government
> to be present when a Pharoah's tomb was opened years before, is
> shown holding the calvarium in the second photo.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/krogwskull.jpg
>
> <
> Moments after this photo was taken of Krogman with the specimen,
> an associate -- a medical doctor -- walked into his office at the
> Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., and he told him to come closer
> to see "the oldest human skull ever found."
> <
> Two other photos of the specimen:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-006S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-007S.JPG
>
> <
> Meanwhile, a CATscan revealed a second protrusion not visible
> to the naked eye but located precisely where it would be expected
> to be found in a human cranium.
> <
> Here's a copy of that scan:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg
>
> <
> This specimen also tested positive for the presence of Haversian
> canals under microscopic scrutiny.
> <
> Additionally, American Medical Laboratories performed testing
> of calculus analysis by crystallography on the specimen and
> found "a composition of dried blood intermingled with a few
> small crystals resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."
> <
> The laboratory's official report follows:
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-012S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>=============================================
>
> <
>
>>ANOTHER PETRIFIED HUMAN SKULL -- IN A BOULDER
>
> <
> Another petrified human cranium was found approximately
> a year later only a short distance from where the human
> calvarium was discovered.
> <
> It was -- still is -- embedded in a boulder that must weigh at
> least 3,000 pounds.
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skulla.jpg
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skullb.jpg
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/other1.jpg
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z2_2.jpg
>
> <
> The Smithsonian was sent a photograph and Raymond Rye,
> musem specialist, replied in writing: "The object ... does resemble
> the outline of a human skull ... We must do a microscopic study
> of the outer rind to determine if it has the structure of bone."
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr072782.gif
>
> <
> The Smithsonian had been mailed granules, as requested, then
> weeks later replied: "X-ray analysis of the material reveals it to be
> quartz, the most abundant material of the earth's crust. So, although
> the enigmatic object exposed in the boulder may resemble a hominid
> skull, its mineral compostion is definitely not that of bone."
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr090982.gif
>
> <
> The fact is, "x-ray analysis" is NOTan appropriate test to identify
> the presence or absence of cellular structure.
> <
> Later, a microcopic photo of granules removed from the specimen
> revealed the presence of Haversian canals. (Actually, I knew they
> did ahead of time because I had examined other granules
> microscopically before sending them to the Smithsonian.)
> <
> Here's one of those microscopic photos of the cell structure:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/proof1.jpg
>
> <
>
>>==================================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED HUMAN FEMUR
>
> <
> This is a petrified human femur still embedded in shale, a near-cousin
> of coal. Portions of the bulb ends have broken off.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z6femur.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z8femur.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/z7femur.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Spec/MVC-001S.JPG
>
> <
> Since a femur measures approximately one-fourth of a human
> being's height, the femur belonged to someone at least 7 1/2-foot
> tall.
> <
>
>>>================================================== ===
>
> <
>
>>PORTION OF A TIBIA (Fraudulently Tested)
>
> <
> This specimen was identified as a portion of a tibia by Krogman
> and was subjected to one of the greatest cover-ups in the history
> of science.
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/newtibia.jpg
>
> <
> Andrew Macrae, then of Calgary University, performed fraudulent
> testing when entrusted to examine its cellular structure and publish
> the microscopic photos on his web page. Instead. he posted
> microscopic photos of a rock or a concretion.
> <
> Macrae undoubtedly was advised and assisted by Paul Myers, then
> of Temple University in Philadelphia and now at the University of
> Minnesota.
> <
> When charged with participating in the scam, Myers adamantly denied
> it. Then, when I suggested officials of Temple University check their
> long-distance telephone calls during the time that Macrae was
> "testing" the specimen in the summer of 1996, Myers suddenly admitted
> in the talk.origins news group that he had made many phone calls
> to Calgary University in that time span but on other business.
> <
> It didn't end there. Myers later admitted in talk.origins that he had
> FLOWN to Calgary one weekend during that same time period and had
> spent time on campus. He said he didn't even have a chance to say
> hello to Macrae, claiming he was there on other business.
> <
> Here are two additional photos of the portion of the petrified tibia,
> (known as EC96-001 for Macrae's fraudulent testing purposes).
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib2.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib1.jpg
>
> <
> In addition, a scanning electronic microscope (SEM) was used
> to examine the interior surface features of this specimen and then
> compare it with cadaver bone at the same power magnification. These
> are the photos at 2,000-times magnification:.
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/bones.jpg
>
> <
> (They would look incredibly similiar if the grains were lying in
> exactly the same direction.)
> <
> The left photo in the first URL below shows what Andrew Macrae
> posted on his web page, claiming it was the cell structure of
> C96-001 and nothing like bone should look like (in the right photo).
> The next two photos show EC96-001's true cell structure.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/canals/ts_compare1.jpg
>>>http://edconrad.com/canals/slide1.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/canals/0505160x.jpg
>
> <
> It was just one of several fraudulent maneuvers perpetrated
> by members of the Scientifiic Establishment over the past 21 1/2
> years when the first specimen -- the large petrified skull -- was
> discovered.
> <
> Additionally, American Medical Laboratories performed calculus
> analysis by crystallography on EC96-001 and determined that it
> "consisted predominately of dried blood and protein."
> <
> That report follows:
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-006S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>==============================================
>>
>>PETRIFIED MANDIBLES
>
> <
> Here's an assorment of miscellaneous specimens, primarily portions
> of petrified mandibles (jaw bones), found between the same coal veins:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-005S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-007S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-008S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-009S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>==============================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED HUMAN LUNG
>
> <
> Here's a petrified human lung found between coal veins.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-015S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-016S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-017S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-018S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-019S.JPG
>
> <
> A lung is a soft organ and, as such, many contend it can never
> petrify. However, in recent years it was established conclusively
> that soft organs can indeed be subjected to the petrification process.
> <
>
>>>============================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED GALL BLADDER, WITH GALLSTONE
>
> <
> Here's a petrified gall bladder, and a CATscan revealed the presence
> of a gall stone inside.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z5gall.jpg
>
> <
> This is one of the specimens that also was tested at American
> Medical Laboratories via calculus analysis by crystallography.
> <
> It revealed the specimen "consists of a few small pieces of dried
> blood," adding that "none of the constituents normally found
> in urinary calculi are present." (which comes as no surprise since
> the specimen it tested is petrified).
> <
> That report follows:
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-010S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>==============================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED HUMAN BRAIN
>
> <
> This is a petrified human brain (one hemisphere):
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-002S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-003S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-004S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-005S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>============================================
>
> <
>
>>>ANOTHER PETRIFIED BONE
>
> <
> Here's another petrified bone (a knee?):
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix4/MVC-013S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix4/MVC-012S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix4/MVC-014S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpiv4/MVC-015S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>=============================================
>
> <
>
>>PAIR OF PETRIFIED FETUSES
>
> <
> Here are a pair of petrified fetuses.The large one, which has
> been transformed to a coal-like substance, measures 6 1/2
> inches in length.
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-010S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-011S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>===============================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED DINOSAUR FOOT
>
> <
> Here's a portion of a dinosaur foot embedded in slate (or shale):
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-013S.JPG
>
> <
> It should be noted that a third "toe" was later found embedded
> in the slate where it would be expected to be. A video tape exists
> showing the top cover of slate patiently being removed, revealing
> the third "toe" just beneath the surface.
> <
> I should mention that the petrified femur and petrifed dinosaur
> foot remain as you see them -- still embedded in slate (or shale)
> -- the way they were steamshoveled from between coal veins.
> <
> They are somewhere in this photo, taken from approximately five
> miles up, of scar-marked land that was strip-mined of its coal. But
> those remarkable discoveries are still there if you'd like to search.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/MVC-015S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>=============================================
>
> <
>
>>HANDCRAFTED WOODEN TOOL
>
> <
> Here's a petrified handcrafted wooden handle which has been
> transformed to anthracite. It also was found between the same
> two coal veins.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-002S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-004S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>============================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED BONE EMBEDDED IN SLATE
>
> <
> Here's a portion of petrified bone still embedded in slate,
> confirming that it's older than the material in which it was encased.
> Obviously, that material had to be fluid or in a fluidy state for
> something to harden around it.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG
>>>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-016S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-017S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG
>
>
>>>============================================
>
>
>>GIANT CANINE TOOTH
>
>
> Here's a giant canine tooth, found between the same coal veins:
>
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-009S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-007S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-008S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-006S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-010S.JPG
>
> <
> (I accidentally dropped the giant tooth on the sidewalk in Hazleton,
> Pa. -- too heavy for the paper bag --and the tip broke off but the
> two pieces fit together almost perfectly.)
> <
>
>>>==================================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED FETUS EMBEDDED IN SLATE
>
> <
> Here's another petrified fetus, this one still embedded in slatE
> (or shale).
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-002S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-004S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>================================================
>
> <
>
>>PORTION OF GIANT PETRIFIED SCORPION
>
> <
> This is a portion of a giant prehistoric scorpion that was
> identified as such by Wilton Krogman.
> <
> When the world famous bone expert examined this specimen
> found between coal veins, he first turned to me and mentioned
> that he had performed countless disections of scorpions in college.
> <
> "What you have, Mr. Conrad (never Ed), is a portion of a giant
> prehistoric scorpion," he told me.
> <
> When discovered, the specimen was broken in two parts but they
> fit together perfectly.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-022S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-008S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-017S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-006S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-021S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-009S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-019S.JPG
>
> <
> This particular specimen was the subject of another cover-up
> by members of the Scientific Establishment -- the Department of
> Entomology at Penn State University.
> <
> Penn State actually has batted 0-for-3 with its attempted
> cover-ups of my specimens: First, its Department of Paleontology
> (Roger Cuffey); Second, its Department of Anthropology (Robert
> Eckardt). Third, its Department of Entomology (Charles Pitts).
> <
>
>>>===========================================
>
> <
>
>>YERKES CONFIRMS SPECIMEN IS BONE
>
>
> One of the specimens found between anthracite veins was positively
> identified as petrified bone by the Yerkes Regional Primate Research
> Center at Emory University in Atlanta, Ga., which Krogman described
> as "the most prestigious institution of its kind in the world."
> <
> Jeremy Dahl, one of its bone experts who examined and tested it,
> even put it in writing and signed his name, also making a drawing
> of the specimen that he had examined and tested..
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES1.TIF
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES2.TIF
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES3.TIF
>
> <
> Dahl definitely had examined the specimen's cell structure because
> he had cut off a slice while it was is possession.
> <
>
>>=================================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED HOMINID MANDIBLE
>
> <
> Here's another petrified hominid jaw, the frontal portion. Inclusions
> are embedded in it, possibly teeth or even part of the tongue.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-003S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-004S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-005S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-006S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>================================================
>
> <
>
>>ANOTHER PETRIFIED SOFT ORGAN
>
> <
> Here's another soft organ that had petrified:
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-008S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-011S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-010S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-009S.JPG
>>>
>>>=============================================
>
> <
>
>> PETRIFIED EGGS
>
> <
> Here are what appear to be petrified eggs. About eight of them
> were found together more than 200 feet below the original
> surface of the ground (on the side wall of a stripping pit).
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-021F.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-022F.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-023F.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-024F.JPG
>
> <
> Here's where they were found: (that's a bulldozer):
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-015S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>==========================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED BONE EMBEDDED IN SLATE
>
> <
> Here are other specimens of petrified bone embedded in slate.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>===========================================
>
> <
>
>>SOMEWHAT SIMILIAR SPECIMENS
>
> <
> Here are two strange specimens, almost similiar. What makes them
> so intriguing is that they were found between anthracite veins some
> 40 miles apart -- one near Shenandoah and the other near Wilkes-Barre.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-016S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-017S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>===============================================
>
> <
>
>>THREE INTRIGUING SPECIMENS
>
>
> Here are three intriguing specimens:
> (For the kids' sake, let's call 'em "The Three Tenors.)
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-004S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-005S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>===============================================
>
> <
>
>>RAYMOND DART IMPRESSED
>
> <
> The late, great Raymond Dart, MD., relished the opportunity to examine
> some of the specimens after Krogman had informed him about them.
> <
> This photo shows Dart holding what Krogman identified as a calvarium,
> a human cranium with the eye sockets broken off.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/dart.jpg
>
> <
> Here's Raymond Dart's letter:
> <
>
>>===============================================
>>
>>> 28 October, 1983
>>>
>>>Dear Mr. Conrad:
>>>
>>>This is being written as a follow-up to our meeting here in
>>>Philadelphia on Saturday, Oct. 15, during which I had the
>>>opportunity to examine many of the rock-like objects you
>>>had discovered in the coal fields of Pennsylvania, near
>>>Shenandoah.
>
> <
>
>>>In my opinion, the vast majority bear the contour of bone
>>>
>>>>and may well be petrified bone.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I was particularly intrigued by one of your specimens which
>>>I agree bears a distinct resemblance to a dainosaur head
>>>or a homind skullcap, heavily petrified.
>
> <
>
>>>Based on our vast ignorance about vulconology, as regards
>>>both anatomy and anthropology, I am of the opinion that your
>>>findings definitely warrant intense investigation by that subject's
>>>foremost experts, especially here in America where so many
>>>volcanic disturbances occur even today.
>
> <
>
>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>
>>>> Raymond A. Dart (signed)
>>>
>>>Raymond A. Dart, M.D.
>>>Institute of Man
>>>The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential
>>>8801 Stenton Avenue
>>>Philadelphia, Pa. 19118
>
>
> Here's a photo of Raymond Dart with Ed Conrad (the photo was
> taken by a house painter who obliged by decending a ladder
> to do so.)
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/wdart.jpg
>
> <
>
>>===============================================
>
> <
>
>>DINOSAUR FOOT EMBEDDED IN SLATE
>
> <
> That man co-existed with dinosaurs -- back while anthracite was
> being formed -- gains credence with these photos of a petrified
> dinosaur foot embedded in slate.
>
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z3dino.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/Dfoot.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/MVC-039S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>===========================================
>
> <
>
>>PECULAIR SPECIMEN
>
> <
> Another specimen of petrified bone embedded in slate:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate1.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate5.jpg
>
> <
> The original Easter bunny? Then, again, it might be the head
> of a petrified jackass. And, IF it is, it would be rather appropriate.
> <
> The Scientific Establishment -- led by its worldwide brood of
> arrogant, defiant tenured fossils -- has long been treating
> John Q. Public, and his kids, like a jackass, promoting fairy tales
> and molesting truth.
> <
> Over the past 22 years, it has engaged in deceit, deception, collusion
> and conspiracy -- of MONUMENTAL proportions -- and one of the
> ringleaders has been the Smithsonian Institution.
> <
>
>>================================================
>>================================================
>
>
> And here's my final thought (six pictures should be worth
> 6,000 words):
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-002S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-003S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-011S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-012S.JPG
>>>http://edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/zedjaw.jpg
>
> <
> No question, members of the scientific establishment academia
> -- professors, students and alumni -- have long been fearful
> of me and my discoveries because of the dire consequences
> they realized what truth would bring.
> <
> And well they should have been because now that time has
> come. They're finally being put in their place and recognized
> for the total disgrace to science that they have been.
> <
> NOW they're not just *afraid* of Ed Conrad. They're terrified.
> <
> Ed Conrad
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com
>
>
> Man as Old as Coal
> and
> Proof of Life After Death
>
>
>>http://www.edconrad.com
>
>
>
> =======================================
>
>
>>MAN AS OLD AS COAL
>
>
> As you all know by now, truth no longer is playing second fiddle
> to the fiction, fantasy and fairy tales that have been dished out
> for more than a century about man's origin and ancestry.
> <
> Finally, it's the official end of the deceit, deception, collusion and
> conspiracy that has long been perpetrated by arrogant, egotistical
> members of the Scientific Establshment in and out of its hallowed
> Halls of Learning.
*********SPV.....What about Religious Establishment?
> <
> Their monumental hoax on mankind has met its match with the
> presentation of undeniable physical evidence that, multi-millions of
> years ago, the good earth wasn't anything like what has long
> been depicted by the scientific community.
> <
> For one thing, man -- in almost our present form -- existed while
> coal was being formed, and our ancestors lived alongside
> giant scorpions, dinosaurs and beasts with six-inch-high canine
> teeth.
> <
> And man and animals had one thing in common. Both were
> annihilated in some incredible catastrophe that blew them limb
> from limb and scattered their bones, teeth and soft organs
> in all directions..
> <
> What happened next is a testament to the late, great Immanuel
> Velikovsky who, more than a half-century ago, said the true story
> of earth's -- and man's -- past is written in the rocks, visible for
> all to see as part of the fossil record.
> <
> Eons ago -- before coal hardened -- some sort of fluid engulfed the
> bones, teeth and soft organs just after the great catastrophe, causing
> them to petrifiy and now offer a mindboggling horror story of
> mankind's distant past.
> <
> That man existed during the Carboniferous Period also offers
> proof that we could not possibly have evolved as suggested
> by the Darwin Theory.
> <
> Rightly so, because the theory of the evolution of man never
> possessed a shred of physical evidence in the first place.
> Man could not -- and did not -- become such a magnificent machine
> by a series of incredible accidents of nature since it's an
> astronomical mathematical absurdity.
> <
> Even Charles Darwin had a sneaky suspicion his theory was full
> of hot air.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/truth/tosuppose.gif
>
> <
> And Earnest Hooton, longtime professor of anthropology at Harvard
> University, seconded the motion years later in his book, "Apes, Men
> and Morons," citing the absence of undeniable physical evidence.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-013S.JPG
>
> <
> But, since we were spoon-fed such pablum -- the evolution of man --
> by members of the omniscient Scientific Establishment, most of us
> ate up every word. These pompous asses were neither to be
> questioned nor challenged.
> <
> About a year after finding my first specimen of petrified bone between
> coal veins in June 1981, I couldn't believe the incedible resistence
> I was encountering in my pursuit of honest investigation.
> <
> My longtime friend, Clayton Lennon (1900-1996), warned me it
> wouldn't be easy and one day, between puffs of his cigar,
> summed up my despair quite eloquently .
> <
>
>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/edyournot.gif
>
> <
> Meanwhile, as their noses continued to grow, so also did the
> arrogance of members of the Scientific Establishment who had
> long lost the goal of a search for truth. The only important thing
> to them, I soon learned, was to make no waves and concentrate
> on protecting their vested interests.
> <
> Over time, they had become incredibly ruthless and bold, really
> believing that -- as members of omnipotent Acadamia -- they could
> do anything they damn well pleased and answer to no one..
> <
> Since I have had a ringside seat over these past 22 years, I assure
> you that it has included not only denial of physical evidence that
> could -- would -- destroy the theory of the evolution of man but
> actually tampering with that evidence -- and I have come right out
> and named names.
> <
> Then, with brass testacles, the criminals were actually belitting
> the victim, with character assassination leveled like a Gatling gun.
> <
> And even worse, the assault on truth was adamantly defended by
> their colleagues.
> <
> Fortunately, for your grandchildren and mine, that day is over.
> The pseudoscientists' day of reckoning has finally arrived.
> <
> But it comes as no surprise. After all, they had been forewarned:
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/canals/hooton.gif
>
> <
> ==================================================
> <
> TRUTH FINALLY CATCHES UP TO THE PERPETRATORS
> OF DECEIT, DECEPTION, COLLUSION AND CONSPIRACY
> <
> ================================================== =
> <
>
>>> MAN AS OLD AS COAL
>>> All Specimens Found Between Anthracite Veins
>
> <
> (Strata geologically dated at a minimum of 280 million years)
> <
> Here are just a few of the thousands upon thousands of specimens
> of petrified bones, teeth and/or even soft organs -- some human --
> that I have discovered between two separate anthracite veins
> in Northeastern Pennsylvania over the past 22 years.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z8femur.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z5gall.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/newtibia.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/skullb.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/z9lung.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/MVC-013F.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/pp/MVC-022S.JPG
>
> <
> Strange, according to scientific doctrine, they couldn't possibly
> have been found in Carboniferous strata, dated at a minimum
> of 280 million years.
> <
> You see, every scientific textbook insists that no large land
> animals, let alone man, existed back then. Hell, man wouldn't begin
> evolving until multi-millions of years later, the pseudos proclaimed.
> <
> But the incredible arsenal of petrified bones, teeth and even soft
> organs proves -- beyond doubt -- that man and large land animals
> indeed had been around when coal was being formed. Otherwise,
> their mortal remains could not have been preserved between layers
> of anthracite as the result of a catastrophe beyond our wildest
> imagination.
> <
> And, since this is the grim evidence that a catastrophe happened
> before, there is NO question that it could happen again.
> <
> Velikovsky provided evidence of catastrophes in his two books,
> "Worlds in Collision" and "Earth in Upheaval," published back
> in the early 1950s. In them, he offered undeniable evidence of
> calamities beyond human comprehension but was ridiculed
> and badmouthed by members of the Scientific Establishment.
> <
> Here's a copy of these two books, in paperback, and an explanation
> why Velikovsky was treated with scorn and contempt, which is how
> members of the Scientific Establishment have treated me for the last
> 21 1/2 years.
> <
>
>>>================================================== ==
>
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/ebay/Petrifiedx/MVC-010S.JPG
>>>http://edconrad.com/ebay/Petrifiedx/MVC-011S.JPG
>
> <
> More Velikvosky:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-014S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-008S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>================================================== ==
>
> <
> A longtime newspaperman, I figured -- when realizing I was getting
> the shaft from the Scientific Establishment -- I'd get a fair shake
> from newspapers in an effort to tell my story.
> <
> I thought the editors would be genuinely interested in what might've
> sounded like a farfetched story, except that it was backed up by
> petrified bones, teeth and soft organs as old as coal.
> <
> Reporters from the Allentown (Pa.) Call-Chronicle and Las Vegas
> Sun, to mention just two, were greatly impressed. But when their
> stories appeared in print, it took my breath away. The articles were
> completely negative, making me look like that proverbial horse's
> ass.
> <
> Naturally, there was nothing I could do about it, so I had to give up
> on newspapers completely. I had long known the New York Times,
> Washington Post and Philadelphia Inquirer wouldn't touch it because
> they had several opportunities to do so but bowed to their vested
> interests and ignored me.
> <
> Ditto for the TV network news shows like "60 Minutes."
> <
> For the longest time, it appeared the world would never know the truth
> about the catastrophe that decimated both man and animal while coal
> was being formed.
> <
> Then a miracle happened -- along came the Internet. It gave me a way
> to reach the pubic but, of course, the public wasn't paying attention
> because members of the Scientific Establishment kept making me
> look like a fool and an imbecile.
> <
> And, if you recall, they had been doing a mighty fine job of it
> right up until yesterday. That's when members of the Scientific
> Establishment got the second biggest shock of their lives, dwarfed
> only by the attack on the Twin Towers.
> <
> Suddenly overnight, with the presentation of an arsenal of physical
> evidence, the ridicule and character assassination have eased
> somewhat.
> <
> Suddenly, their cannons ran out of ammunition, accusations that
> I'm a liar and a fraud.
> <
> Suddenly, these Clown Princes of Sciences -- long having made
> a joke at the expense of sacred Science -- finally realized that
> their involvement in deceit, deception, collusion and conspiracy
> has caught up with them.
> <
> These Omniscient Buffoons have defended their colleagues
> who, with incredible audacity, have made a mockery of physical
> evidence, totally ignoring it and sometimes even tampering with it.
> <
> Thomas Alva Edison probably put in a nutshell what they were
> doing for so long, and my dear friend Clayton was right on target,
> too.
> <
>
>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/quotesnew.gif
>
> <
> ===========================================
>
>>========= SOME OF THE SPECIMENS =========
>
> ===========================================
> <
>
>>THE VERY FIRST DISCOVERY
>
> <
> The following is the very first discovery of petrified bone in
> coal-bearing Carboniferous strata in June 1981.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/first.jpg
>
> <
> The specimen, which I found by accident, resembled a giant skull
> and the Smithsonian expressed an interest after receiving a photo,
> inviting me to bring it down to Washington so it could be examined
> firsthand.
> <
> Three of its "experts" -- an anthropologist, a paleontologist and a
> geologist -- looked it over carefully but, after a few minutes,
> concurred that it was nothing more than a rock or concretion,
> certainly nothng that had ever lived.
> <
> No one mentioned that a microscopic study of the specimen's
> cellular structure would accurately identify whether it is or is not
> bone. (I had no knowledge of this fact at the time and wouldn't
> be aware of it until many months later)
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/textbook.gif
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/thefactthat.gif
>
> <
> In any event, while preparing to leave the Smithsonian, I politely
> asked if they would want to keep the specimen, perhaps to break
> apart the jaw-like area to see if teeth could be found inside. The
> three "experts" -- Joseph Brown and Robert McCurdy, the only
> two names I remember -- laughed at me and said it would be
> an absolute waste of their time.
> <
> About a month later -- rather discouraged -- I decided to search
> the interior of the jaw-like area on my own. It began with a nail
> to penetrate the rock hardness, then using all sorts of small tools
> to reach inside and, strangely, begin pulling out what resembled
> brownish dirt.
> <
> I was mysified that some sort of cavity existed and contacted
> the Smithsonian about this -- but was ignored.
> <
> After several weeks of part-time labor, I found a pair of peculiar
> objects inside. Photos were taken, greatly enlarged and sent to
> Krogman, the bone expert.
> <
> Our friendship had begun months previous when I had driven
> to Lancaster to show him the first strange sPecimen I had found
> that had come from between coal veins -- the large skull that
> the Smithsonian later dismissed as a rock.
> <
> Krogman studied the photo of the inclusion and then told me over
> the phone that the object is definitely a premolar tooth because
> "I can see a pair of cusps."
> <
> Here's the photo that Krogman had examined, with the dime
> offering an indication of size.
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-014S.JPG
>
> <
> The photo below shows another view of where the premolar was
> attached.
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/z1.jpg
>
> <
> Krogman suggested an infrared scan be performed and it was done
> at American Medical Laboratories in Chantilly, Va. Here's the result
> of the test:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/graph.gif
>
> <
> This is what the laboratory stated in its official report:
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/result.gif
>
> <
> It meant that the inclusion in the jaw-like area was neither rock
> nor concretion but something that once lived.
> <
> When the scan was interpreted later, this fact was confirmed.
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/compatible.gif
>
> <
> It also should be emphasized that microscopic study of the
> skull-like object was conducted and Haversian canals -- miniscule
> circles, the tell-tale sign of bone -- were visible.
> <
> It had prompted Krogman, at one point, to offer great encourgement,
> as he followed the discoveries with great interest.:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/krogquote.gif
>
> <
>
>>>============================================
>>>PETRIFIED HUMAN SKULL
>
> <
> The following specimen was identified by Krogman as a petrified
> human calvarium -- a skull with the eyesockets broken off -- after
> he personally had examined it and even measured it with
> caliphers, expressing pleasure with the results..
> <
> Krogman, who was personally invited by the Egyptian government
> to be present when a Pharoah's tomb was opened years before, is
> shown holding the calvarium in the second photo.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z11calv.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/krogwskull.jpg
>
> <
> Moments after this photo was taken of Krogman with the specimen,
> an associate -- a medical doctor -- walked into his office at the
> Cooper Clinic in Lancaster, Pa., and he told him to come closer
> to see "the oldest human skull ever found."
> <
> Two other photos of the specimen:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-006S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/MVC-007S.JPG
>
> <
> Meanwhile, a CATscan revealed a second protrusion not visible
> to the naked eye but located precisely where it would be expected
> to be found in a human cranium.
> <
> Here's a copy of that scan:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/images/catcalv.jpg
>
> <
> This specimen also tested positive for the presence of Haversian
> canals under microscopic scrutiny.
> <
> Additionally, American Medical Laboratories performed testing
> of calculus analysis by crystallography on the specimen and
> found "a composition of dried blood intermingled with a few
> small crystals resembling calcium oxalate dihydrate."
> <
> The laboratory's official report follows:
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-012S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>=============================================
>
> <
>
>>ANOTHER PETRIFIED HUMAN SKULL -- IN A BOULDER
>
> <
> Another petrified human cranium was found approximately
> a year later only a short distance from where the human
> calvarium was discovered.
> <
> It was -- still is -- embedded in a boulder that must weigh at
> least 3,000 pounds.
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skulla.jpg
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/skullb.jpg
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/other1.jpg
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z2_2.jpg
>
> <
> The Smithsonian was sent a photograph and Raymond Rye,
> musem specialist, replied in writing: "The object ... does resemble
> the outline of a human skull ... We must do a microscopic study
> of the outer rind to determine if it has the structure of bone."
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr072782.gif
>
> <
> The Smithsonian had been mailed granules, as requested, then
> weeks later replied: "X-ray analysis of the material reveals it to be
> quartz, the most abundant material of the earth's crust. So, although
> the enigmatic object exposed in the boulder may resemble a hominid
> skull, its mineral compostion is definitely not that of bone."
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/rr090982.gif
>
> <
> The fact is, "x-ray analysis" is NOTan appropriate test to identify
> the presence or absence of cellular structure.
> <
> Later, a microcopic photo of granules removed from the specimen
> revealed the presence of Haversian canals. (Actually, I knew they
> did ahead of time because I had examined other granules
> microscopically before sending them to the Smithsonian.)
> <
> Here's one of those microscopic photos of the cell structure:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/proof1.jpg
>
> <
>
>>==================================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED HUMAN FEMUR
>
> <
> This is a petrified human femur still embedded in shale, a near-cousin
> of coal. Portions of the bulb ends have broken off.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z6femur.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z8femur.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/z7femur.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Spec/MVC-001S.JPG
>
> <
> Since a femur measures approximately one-fourth of a human
> being's height, the femur belonged to someone at least 7 1/2-foot
> tall.
> <
>
>>>================================================== ===
>
> <
>
>>PORTION OF A TIBIA (Fraudulently Tested)
>
> <
> This specimen was identified as a portion of a tibia by Krogman
> and was subjected to one of the greatest cover-ups in the history
> of science.
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/newtibia.jpg
>
> <
> Andrew Macrae, then of Calgary University, performed fraudulent
> testing when entrusted to examine its cellular structure and publish
> the microscopic photos on his web page. Instead. he posted
> microscopic photos of a rock or a concretion.
> <
> Macrae undoubtedly was advised and assisted by Paul Myers, then
> of Temple University in Philadelphia and now at the University of
> Minnesota.
> <
> When charged with participating in the scam, Myers adamantly denied
> it. Then, when I suggested officials of Temple University check their
> long-distance telephone calls during the time that Macrae was
> "testing" the specimen in the summer of 1996, Myers suddenly admitted
> in the talk.origins news group that he had made many phone calls
> to Calgary University in that time span but on other business.
> <
> It didn't end there. Myers later admitted in talk.origins that he had
> FLOWN to Calgary one weekend during that same time period and had
> spent time on campus. He said he didn't even have a chance to say
> hello to Macrae, claiming he was there on other business.
> <
> Here are two additional photos of the portion of the petrified tibia,
> (known as EC96-001 for Macrae's fraudulent testing purposes).
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib2.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/z15tib1.jpg
>
> <
> In addition, a scanning electronic microscope (SEM) was used
> to examine the interior surface features of this specimen and then
> compare it with cadaver bone at the same power magnification. These
> are the photos at 2,000-times magnification:.
> <
>
>>>http://edconrad.com/oldascoal/images/bones.jpg
>
> <
> (They would look incredibly similiar if the grains were lying in
> exactly the same direction.)
> <
> The left photo in the first URL below shows what Andrew Macrae
> posted on his web page, claiming it was the cell structure of
> C96-001 and nothing like bone should look like (in the right photo).
> The next two photos show EC96-001's true cell structure.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/canals/ts_compare1.jpg
>>>http://edconrad.com/canals/slide1.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/canals/0505160x.jpg
>
> <
> It was just one of several fraudulent maneuvers perpetrated
> by members of the Scientifiic Establishment over the past 21 1/2
> years when the first specimen -- the large petrified skull -- was
> discovered.
> <
> Additionally, American Medical Laboratories performed calculus
> analysis by crystallography on EC96-001 and determined that it
> "consisted predominately of dried blood and protein."
> <
> That report follows:
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-006S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>==============================================
>>
>>PETRIFIED MANDIBLES
>
> <
> Here's an assorment of miscellaneous specimens, primarily portions
> of petrified mandibles (jaw bones), found between the same coal veins:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-006S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-010S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-003S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-004S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-005S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-007S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-008S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-009S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Bones/MVC-011S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>==============================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED HUMAN LUNG
>
> <
> Here's a petrified human lung found between coal veins.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-015S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-016S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-017S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-018S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-019S.JPG
>
> <
> A lung is a soft organ and, as such, many contend it can never
> petrify. However, in recent years it was established conclusively
> that soft organs can indeed be subjected to the petrification process.
> <
>
>>>============================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED GALL BLADDER, WITH GALLSTONE
>
> <
> Here's a petrified gall bladder, and a CATscan revealed the presence
> of a gall stone inside.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z5gall.jpg
>
> <
> This is one of the specimens that also was tested at American
> Medical Laboratories via calculus analysis by crystallography.
> <
> It revealed the specimen "consists of a few small pieces of dried
> blood," adding that "none of the constituents normally found
> in urinary calculi are present." (which comes as no surprise since
> the specimen it tested is petrified).
> <
> That report follows:
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-010S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>==============================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED HUMAN BRAIN
>
> <
> This is a petrified human brain (one hemisphere):
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-002S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-003S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-004S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/brain/MVC-005S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>============================================
>
> <
>
>>>ANOTHER PETRIFIED BONE
>
> <
> Here's another petrified bone (a knee?):
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix4/MVC-013S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix4/MVC-012S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix4/MVC-014S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpiv4/MVC-015S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>=============================================
>
> <
>
>>PAIR OF PETRIFIED FETUSES
>
> <
> Here are a pair of petrified fetuses.The large one, which has
> been transformed to a coal-like substance, measures 6 1/2
> inches in length.
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-010S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-011S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>===============================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED DINOSAUR FOOT
>
> <
> Here's a portion of a dinosaur foot embedded in slate (or shale):
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix3/z3dino.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-013S.JPG
>
> <
> It should be noted that a third "toe" was later found embedded
> in the slate where it would be expected to be. A video tape exists
> showing the top cover of slate patiently being removed, revealing
> the third "toe" just beneath the surface.
> <
> I should mention that the petrified femur and petrifed dinosaur
> foot remain as you see them -- still embedded in slate (or shale)
> -- the way they were steamshoveled from between coal veins.
> <
> They are somewhere in this photo, taken from approximately five
> miles up, of scar-marked land that was strip-mined of its coal. But
> those remarkable discoveries are still there if you'd like to search.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/MVC-015S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>=============================================
>
> <
>
>>HANDCRAFTED WOODEN TOOL
>
> <
> Here's a petrified handcrafted wooden handle which has been
> transformed to anthracite. It also was found between the same
> two coal veins.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-002S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-004S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-003S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Tool/MVC-005S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>============================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED BONE EMBEDDED IN SLATE
>
> <
> Here's a portion of petrified bone still embedded in slate,
> confirming that it's older than the material in which it was encased.
> Obviously, that material had to be fluid or in a fluidy state for
> something to harden around it.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG
>>>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-016S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-017S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG
>
>
>>>============================================
>
>
>>GIANT CANINE TOOTH
>
>
> Here's a giant canine tooth, found between the same coal veins:
>
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Petrified/1tooth.jpg
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-009S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-007S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-008S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-006S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-010S.JPG
>
> <
> (I accidentally dropped the giant tooth on the sidewalk in Hazleton,
> Pa. -- too heavy for the paper bag --and the tip broke off but the
> two pieces fit together almost perfectly.)
> <
>
>>>==================================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED FETUS EMBEDDED IN SLATE
>
> <
> Here's another petrified fetus, this one still embedded in slatE
> (or shale).
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-005S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-002S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Day/MVC-004S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>================================================
>
> <
>
>>PORTION OF GIANT PETRIFIED SCORPION
>
> <
> This is a portion of a giant prehistoric scorpion that was
> identified as such by Wilton Krogman.
> <
> When the world famous bone expert examined this specimen
> found between coal veins, he first turned to me and mentioned
> that he had performed countless disections of scorpions in college.
> <
> "What you have, Mr. Conrad (never Ed), is a portion of a giant
> prehistoric scorpion," he told me.
> <
> When discovered, the specimen was broken in two parts but they
> fit together perfectly.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-022S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-020S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-008S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-017S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/MVC-006S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-021S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-009S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Scorpion/MVC-019S.JPG
>
> <
> This particular specimen was the subject of another cover-up
> by members of the Scientific Establishment -- the Department of
> Entomology at Penn State University.
> <
> Penn State actually has batted 0-for-3 with its attempted
> cover-ups of my specimens: First, its Department of Paleontology
> (Roger Cuffey); Second, its Department of Anthropology (Robert
> Eckardt). Third, its Department of Entomology (Charles Pitts).
> <
>
>>>===========================================
>
> <
>
>>YERKES CONFIRMS SPECIMEN IS BONE
>
>
> One of the specimens found between anthracite veins was positively
> identified as petrified bone by the Yerkes Regional Primate Research
> Center at Emory University in Atlanta, Ga., which Krogman described
> as "the most prestigious institution of its kind in the world."
> <
> Jeremy Dahl, one of its bone experts who examined and tested it,
> even put it in writing and signed his name, also making a drawing
> of the specimen that he had examined and tested..
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES1.TIF
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES2.TIF
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/YERKES3.TIF
>
> <
> Dahl definitely had examined the specimen's cell structure because
> he had cut off a slice while it was is possession.
> <
>
>>=================================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED HOMINID MANDIBLE
>
> <
> Here's another petrified hominid jaw, the frontal portion. Inclusions
> are embedded in it, possibly teeth or even part of the tongue.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-002S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-003S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-004S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-005S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Newpix5/MVC-006S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>================================================
>
> <
>
>>ANOTHER PETRIFIED SOFT ORGAN
>
> <
> Here's another soft organ that had petrified:
> <
>
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-008S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-011S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-010S.JPG
>>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-009S.JPG
>>>
>>>=============================================
>
> <
>
>> PETRIFIED EGGS
>
> <
> Here are what appear to be petrified eggs. About eight of them
> were found together more than 200 feet below the original
> surface of the ground (on the side wall of a stripping pit).
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-021F.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-022F.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-023F.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/AML/MVC-024F.JPG
>
> <
> Here's where they were found: (that's a bulldozer):
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-015S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>==========================================
>
> <
>
>>PETRIFIED BONE EMBEDDED IN SLATE
>
> <
> Here are other specimens of petrified bone embedded in slate.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-014S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-015S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith1/MVC-018S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>===========================================
>
> <
>
>>SOMEWHAT SIMILIAR SPECIMENS
>
> <
> Here are two strange specimens, almost similiar. What makes them
> so intriguing is that they were found between anthracite veins some
> 40 miles apart -- one near Shenandoah and the other near Wilkes-Barre.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-016S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/MVC-017S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>===============================================
>
> <
>
>>THREE INTRIGUING SPECIMENS
>
>
> Here are three intriguing specimens:
> (For the kids' sake, let's call 'em "The Three Tenors.)
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-004S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-005S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>===============================================
>
> <
>
>>RAYMOND DART IMPRESSED
>
> <
> The late, great Raymond Dart, MD., relished the opportunity to examine
> some of the specimens after Krogman had informed him about them.
> <
> This photo shows Dart holding what Krogman identified as a calvarium,
> a human cranium with the eye sockets broken off.
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilx/dart.jpg
>
> <
> Here's Raymond Dart's letter:
> <
>
>>===============================================
>>
>>> 28 October, 1983
>>>
>>>Dear Mr. Conrad:
>>>
>>>This is being written as a follow-up to our meeting here in
>>>Philadelphia on Saturday, Oct. 15, during which I had the
>>>opportunity to examine many of the rock-like objects you
>>>had discovered in the coal fields of Pennsylvania, near
>>>Shenandoah.
>
> <
>
>>>In my opinion, the vast majority bear the contour of bone
>>>
>>>>and may well be petrified bone.
>>>>
>>>
>>>I was particularly intrigued by one of your specimens which
>>>I agree bears a distinct resemblance to a dainosaur head
>>>or a homind skullcap, heavily petrified.
>
> <
>
>>>Based on our vast ignorance about vulconology, as regards
>>>both anatomy and anthropology, I am of the opinion that your
>>>findings definitely warrant intense investigation by that subject's
>>>foremost experts, especially here in America where so many
>>>volcanic disturbances occur even today.
>
> <
>
>>> Yours sincerely,
>>>
>>>> Raymond A. Dart (signed)
>>>
>>>Raymond A. Dart, M.D.
>>>Institute of Man
>>>The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential
>>>8801 Stenton Avenue
>>>Philadelphia, Pa. 19118
>
>
> Here's a photo of Raymond Dart with Ed Conrad (the photo was
> taken by a house painter who obliged by decending a ladder
> to do so.)
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/wdart.jpg
>
> <
>
>>===============================================
>
> <
>
>>DINOSAUR FOOT EMBEDDED IN SLATE
>
> <
> That man co-existed with dinosaurs -- back while anthracite was
> being formed -- gains credence with these photos of a petrified
> dinosaur foot embedded in slate.
>
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Smith/z3dino.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossilxx/Dfoot.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/fossil/MVC-039S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>===========================================
>
> <
>
>>PECULAIR SPECIMEN
>
> <
> Another specimen of petrified bone embedded in slate:
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate1.jpg
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/inslate5.jpg
>
> <
> The original Easter bunny? Then, again, it might be the head
> of a petrified jackass. And, IF it is, it would be rather appropriate.
> <
> The Scientific Establishment -- led by its worldwide brood of
> arrogant, defiant tenured fossils -- has long been treating
> John Q. Public, and his kids, like a jackass, promoting fairy tales
> and molesting truth.
> <
> Over the past 22 years, it has engaged in deceit, deception, collusion
> and conspiracy -- of MONUMENTAL proportions -- and one of the
> ringleaders has been the Smithsonian Institution.
> <
>
>>================================================
>>================================================
>
>
> And here's my final thought (six pictures should be worth
> 6,000 words):
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-001S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-002S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/Vel1/MVC-003S.JPG
>
> <
>
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-011S.JPG
>>>http://www.edconrad.com/ebay/quote/MVC-012S.JPG
>>>http://edconrad.com/ebay/coalbones/zedjaw.jpg
>
> <
> No question, members of the scientific establishment academia
> -- professors, students and alumni -- have long been fearful
> of me and my discoveries because of the dire consequences
> they realized what truth would bring.
> <
> And well they should have been because now that time has
> come. They're finally being put in their place and recognized
> for the total disgrace to science that they have been.
> <
> NOW they're not just *afraid* of Ed Conrad. They're terrified.
> <
> Ed Conrad
>
>> http://www.edconrad.com
>
>
> Man as Old as Coal
> and
> Proof of Life After Death
>
>
>>http://www.edconrad.com
>
>
>