PDA

View Full Version : Baby stroke risk = elderly stroke risk (Lee et al. UCSF)


Todd Gastaldo
July 19th 05, 08:52 PM
PREGNANT WOMEN: Obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30% and may be
causing STROKES in babies.

It is easy to allow your birth canal to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%.

See ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3606



BABY STROKE RISK = ELDERLY STROKE RISK (Lee et al. UCSF)

Dr. John Kylan Lynch, a researcher at the National Institutes of Health,
said:

"It's important for the public to know that most children [with strokes]
will present with seizures in the hospital, but that some will look normal
until about two months of age, when they will develop difficulty with motor
movements on one side of the body..."
--Dr. Lynch quoted by Janice Billingsley
http://hvlib.integris-health.com/healthnews/healthday/050711HD526763.htm

See Lee et al. (UCSF). Annals of Neurology. July 11, 2005 as reported in the
INTEGRIS website article just cited.

ATTENTION Lee et al. (UCSF) via :

SECOND WARNING: Obstetricians are closing birth canals up to 30% GRUESOMELY
wrenching most babies' spines, likely causing strokes in babies. (ALL spinal
manipulation is gruesome with the birth canal closed the "extra" up to 30%.)

NOTE: My first warning to Lee et al. (UCSF) was sent in April 2005.

See UCSF: Could OBs be causing strokes in babies? (Cerebral palsy)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3437

WHY THE SILENCE?



BIZARRELY...

The chiropractic profession and chiropractic media are also silent.

DYNAMIC CHIROPRACTIC editor Don Petersen is silent about obstetricians
closing birth canals up to 30%.

DYNAMIC CHIROPRACTIC editor Don Petersen is silent about obstetricians
KEEPING birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% as they wrench babies'
spines, likely causing strokes in babies.

DYNAMIC CHIROPRACTIC editor Don Petersen is NOT silent though about the fact
that JOHN W. KINSINGER, MD (Neck911USA.com) created a billboard that warned
in effect that CHIROPRACTIC ADJUSTMENTS can cause strokes.

Dr. Kinsinger's billboard reportedly said: "Warning: Chiropractic
Adjustments Can Kill or Permanently Disable You."
http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/23/17/05.html

DYNAMIC CHIROPRACTIC editor Don Petersen publicly labeled Dr. Kinsinger
"Chiropractic Enemy #1" and noted his place of employment (INTEGRIS).

DYNAMIC CHIROPRACTIC editor Don wrote:

"For his actions regarding...Neck911USA.com, Dr. John W. Kinsinger gets our
vote for Chiropractic Enemy #1...[He has hospital privileges at INTEGRIS
Baptist Medical Center (www.integris-health.com)...[I]nterested parties
[can] locate a doctor of their choice using the doctor's last name.]"
http://www.chiroweb.com/archives/23/17/05.html (INTEGRIS emphasis added)

At Dr. Kinsinger's Neck911USA.com website one reads that Neck911USA.com is
concerned too about complications from MEDICAL DOCTORS manipulating spines,
as in,

"Neck911USA is...concerned about [complications due to neck
manipulation]...that arise from medical doctors..."
http://www.neck911usa.com/inde x.htm

In June 2005, I asked Dr. Kinsinger/Neck911USA.com to help stop medical
doctors from closing birth canals the "extra" up to 30%.

See Will Neck911USA.org help babies?
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3661

I copied my question/email to Michael Devitt, senior associate editor at
Dynamic Chiropractic via . NO response from DYNAMIC
CHIROPRACTIC. None. I will copy this email too to DYNAMIC CHIROPRACTIC via


Hopefully, INTEGRIS/Dr. Kinsinger will finally help stop obstetricians from
gruesomely manipulating most babies spines - because it doesn't look like
the chiropractic profession or DYNAMIC CHIROPRACTIC editor Don Petersen are
going to do anything about it any time soon...

I will copy INTEGRIS/Dr. Kinsinger via


ONE GOOD THING CAME FROM READING DYNAMIC CHIROPRACTIC'S Neck911USA
COVERAGE...

I found the Lee et al. (UCSF) study because I visited the INTEGRIS website
and found the above quoted article by Janice Billingsley...

Interesting quote from Billingsley's article:

"[Donna M. Ferriero, M.D. professor, neurology and pediatrics, University of
California, San Francisco] said that further research is needed to
understand the cause of these strokes, for which there is presently no
treatment. A previous UCSF study found that babies born to women with a
history of infertility, women who had infections in the membranes of the
uterus during pregnancy, or women experiencing a delivery-linked blood
pressure condition called preeclampsia were all at higher risk of perinatal
stroke...Ferreiro said that the best thing parents can do is trust their
instincts if they think their child is having development problems...Parents
should talk to their child's pediatrician and not hesitate to ask for a
referral to a specialist, she recommended. They should also look for signs
of stroke -- for example, if the child is only using one arm or seems to
have visual recognition or attention problems, she added."
http://hvlib.integris-health.com/healthnews/healthday/050711HD526763.htm

WHY DIDN'T FERRIERO (co-author of Lee et al.) MENTION THE POSSIBILITY THAT
**OBSTETRICIANS** ARE CAUSING BABIES TO SUFFER STROKES?

After all, I said to Lee et al. (UCSF) in my first warning in April 2005:

"You wrote that the rate of perinatal arterial ischemic stroke
(PAS) increased dramatically when multiple risk factors were present...Some
of the risk factors you listed are quite relevant to the grisly
spectacle of OBs routinely closing birth canals up to 30% and routinely
keeping birth canals closed when babies get stuck, as in,

"FETAL HEART RATE ABNORMALITY: Over three times as many stroke infants vs.
control infants. (46% vs 14%, P<.001)

"PROLONGED SECOND STAGE: Over five times as many stroke infants vs. control
infants. (25% vs 4%, P<.001)

"EMERGENCY CESAREAN DELIVERY: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control
infants.(35% vs 13%, P = .002)

(OR)

"VACUUM EXTRACTION: Over twice as many stroke infants vs. control infants
(24% vs 11%, P = .04)..."

See UCSF: Could OBs be causing strokes in babies? (Cerebral palsy)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3437

KEY POINT...MASS CHILD ABUSE...

I noted for Lee et al. (UCSF) that regardless whether MD-obstetricians are
causing strokes in
babies...

MD-obstetricians have no business closing birth canals up to 30% or keeping
birth canals closed the "extra" up to 30% when babies get stuck - or lying
to cover-up.

I quoted the Four OB Lies.
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3606

I noted that it's mass child abuse.

I wrote: "The MDs among you are mandatory suspected child abuse reporters.
If you suspect child abuse - please immediately report - it's the law."

Of course, it's also the law that MDs are supposed to help babies.

MDs are NOT supposed to help each other cover-up MD crimes...

I can't know the intent of the various parties; but it seems to me obvious
that...

MDs are silent about the obvious obstetric crime because MDs stand to go to
prison.

DCs are silent because they fear that THEIR spinal manipulation will be
tarnished.

It's pathetic - and tragic - fatally so for some babies.

I am in favor of pardons in advance for MDs. As medical students, MDs are
TRAINED to perform rather obvious felonies.

See again: ACOG's 2005 edition: How NOT to birth
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3606

Thanks for reading.

Sincerely,

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo
Hillsboro, Oregon


Copied to: Oregon Atty Genl Hardy Myers via

Copied to: Frank Painter, DC via . Frank,
please post this at www.chiro.org. Please ask Bob Dubin, DC to post it to
his censored version of chiro-list. Chiros are ignoring a CHIROPRACTIC
EMERGENCY.

It's also a NURSING EMERGENCY...

See RNs: 'Stitches, episiotomy, and postpartum complications' (Maternal care
learning needs)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/3725

This post will be archived for global access in the Google usenet archive.

Search http://groups.google.com for "Baby stroke risk = elderly stroke risk"