Re: breastfeeding her 9-year old son

[Shannon]

That is sick!!! If child services were to find out the kid would be taken
and she could possibly be charged for sexual assault because that is pretty
much what it is. The age you are suppose to have stopped by is 2 years and
no later. What a sick person!!!

Shannon
due sept 12

[Larry McMahan]

Shannon > writes:
: That is sick!!! If child services were to find out the kid would be taken
: and she could possibly be charged for sexual assault because that is pretty
: much what it is. The age you are suppose to have stopped by is 2 years and
: no later. What a sick person!!!

: Shannon
: due sept 12

Please don't feed the trolls.

Larry

[DIXIE]

http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22breastfeeding+her+9-year+old+son%22&num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&filter=0

[==Daye==]

On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 10:37:22 -0400, "Shannon"
> wrote:

>The age you are suppose to have stopped by is 2 years and
>no later.

Given that the world average is around 4, who says that you have
to stop at 2???

--
==Daye==
Momma to Jayan
#2 EDD 11 Jan 2004
E-mail: brendana AT labyrinth DOT net DOT au

[Iuil]

"Shannon" wrote
> That is sick!!! If child services were to find out the kid would be taken
> and she could possibly be charged for sexual assault because that is
pretty
> much what it is. The age you are suppose to have stopped by is 2 years and
> no later. What a sick person!!!
>

Says who???

Jean


--
"And he said:
Your children are not your children. They are the sons and daughters of
Life's longing for itself. They come through you but not from you, and
though they are with you, yet they belong not to you." Khalil Gibran

Return address is unread. Replies to <firstnamelastname> @eircom.net.

[Plissken]

"DIXIE" > wrote in message
om...
>
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=%22breastfeeding+her+9-year+old+son%22&num
=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&filter=0

And what was the purpose of you posting this? Are you trying to say that
this is your sister? If so the boy is now 17 years old as this was posted in
1996. And yes that would definitely be sick. And if you are posting this to
say that it has become politically incorrect not to question bf'ing a 9 year
old, how can you say that because of one thread in one newsgroup? I don't
think it's right to bf a nine year old. Up to 4 or so ok, but not 9. That's
gross.

Nadene

[newfy]

"Shannon" > wrote in message
...

The age you are suppose to have stopped by is 2 years and
> no later. What a sick person!!!

*sigh*

BTW, the OP was obviously a troll.

JennP.

[H Schinske]

Nadene ) wrote:

>And what was the purpose of you posting this?

Undoubtedly to stir the pot. Don't feed the troll.

--Helen

[newfy]

"Karen Askey" > wrote in message
...
> The trolls don't bother me. It's ignorant people like Shannon who say
> completely unfounded things like that above that bother me.

Exactly. The reason for my sigh.

I mean, if you're
> going to feed the trolls, at least say something that sounds intelligent.

In another thread she mentioned that she just returned after a three month
hiatus from m.k.p. I am pretty sure I remember her now...

JennP.

[Stephanie and Tim]

"Shannon" > wrote in message
...
> That is sick!!! If child services were to find out the kid would be taken
> and she could possibly be charged for sexual assault because that is
pretty
> much what it is. The age you are suppose to have stopped by is 2 years and
> no later. What a sick person!!!
>
> Shannon
> due sept 12
>
>

2 years is some people's *minimum*. Who says "supposed to?"