Todd Gastaldo
September 2nd 03, 06:50 PM
PREFATORY NOTE: I am NOT opposed to vaccinations - I am adamantly in FAVOR
of vaccinations - as long as parents have a true CHOICE.
In this regard, I want chiros to unite and stop organized medicine's obvious
Exclusion Day vaccination fraud...
See EXCLUSION DAY VACCINATION FRAUD - will Rep. Donald Manzullo (R-Ill) help
expose it?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2119
I also want chiros to unite and stop organized medicine's practice of
closing birth canals and gruesomely (sometimes fatally) manipulating most
babies' spines at birth.
See Pregnant chiro patients: BIZARRE chiro legislation - babies be damned...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2135
CHIROS: I would like to see ACA/ICA/WCA/FSCO unity on these issues by the
Sept. 16, 2003 ACA House of Delegates meeting in Albuquerque...
Onward...
CHIROS MIGHT AS WELL BE INJECTING VACCINATIONS THEMSELVES...
Chiropractors LOST (big) in Wilk v. AMA...
The US Supreme Court ignored its own precedent and let Judge Susan
Getzendanner deny DCs protection under the Sherman Act...
See U.S. Atty Lewis/HepB/Homebirth/Osborn/Souls of Squatting Amazonians
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/26
MASS VACCINATION liability of MDs may be the reason WHY chiropractors lost
(big) in Wilk v. AMA...
>>>>BEGIN substantial excerpt of...
U.S. Atty Lewis/HepB/Homebirth/Osborn/Souls of Squatting Amazonians
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/26
n the last quarter of 1986, ACA Attorney Rosenfeld wrote,
"Chiropractic must join the 'real world' by ceasing opposition to
innoculation..." [Rosenfeld ACA Journal Oct 1986]
The last quarter of 1986 just happened to coincide with a "marked struggle"
by MDs and PharmCo's to cause Congress to give them virtual immunity from
liability for their mass vaccination behavior...[Smith MH. National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act. Pediatrics. 1988;82(2):264-9]
The "last quarter of 1986" ALSO just preceded a key 1987 Congressional
battle
for FUNDING the vaccine injury act...
Smith [1988] notes that "there were powerful opponents to a mandatory
system" back in 1983...
1983 was when PharmCo's and MDs asked Congress for TOTAL immunity from
liability - for a system wherein families of vaccine-injured and
vaccine-dead children could NOT go to court after being forced through the
regulatory process by the new
system. [Smith 1988:268]
[1983 also happened to be the year a new trial was ordered in Wilk v.
AMA...but the new trial did not get underway until 1987...see below...]
[Fast forward to] the last quarter of 1986...the MDs and PharmCo's were on
their
SECOND try...Smith [1988] wrote:
"The only means of avoiding a complete new beginning of the legislation
again in the 100th Congress was to agree that the funding provisions of the
legislation be omitted from consideration...[and]...taken up the next
year..."
Smith [1988] notes that the 100th Congress convened in January 1987...
1987 (May) just happened to be the moment in time when Judge Susan
Getzendanner decided to convene a non-jury trial - FOUR YEARS after a trial
was ordered.
On August 24, 1987 - as Congress was funding the MD's immunity from
vaccine liability program - Judge Getzendanner was ordering the AMA to
publicize in JAMA the AMA's "loss" to the chiropractors. [Wilk v. AMA, 671
F. Supp. 1465]
In December 1987, the vaccine injury act was passed by Congress and signed
by the President.
On January 1, 1988, under Judge Getzendanner's court order, the AMA
published news of the Getzendanner verdict in JAMA.
Has anyone else wondered why the Wilk v. AMA case was suddenly
resurrected in May 1987 - FOUR YEARS after the new trial was ordered in
1983?
Probably just another coincidence, right?
Remember the new trial was ordered back in 1983 when MDs and PharmCo's were
making their FIRST attempt at virtual immunity from liability for their mass
vaccination behavior...
DCs AMONG "POWERFUL OPPONENTS"?
According to Smith [1988], "it became evident early in these [1983]
efforts that there were powerful opponents to a mandatory
system...furthermore, Congress made it clear that they simply would not
consider a system that precluded some opportunity to go to court."
What if it **DCs** were among the "powerful opponents" in 1983?
Even if DCs *weren't* "powerful opponents*, who ARE the "powerful
opponents"?
I ask because 81% of DCs *might* just have something in common with
"powerful opponents." (The 81% estimate comes from Haas and Colley [JMPT
1994:585],
"Eighty-one percent [of DCs surveyed] felt that immunization should be
strictly voluntary")
....MASSIVE health fraud...committed by organized
medicine...
Smith [1988] notes: "[R]eporting requirements HAD TO BE ACCEPTED in the
process of negotiations through the years..." (emphasis added)
Smith [1988] also notes: "Congress had DEMANDED the
inclusion of the reaction reporting requirements as a condition of the
legislation. It will give a better epidemiologic store of information
concerning the real facts in vaccine reactions than we have ever had
before."
....Congress had to DEMAND that MDs
report serious vaccine reactions?
Even stranger: In 1993, then-FDA Commissioner David Kessler, MD offered
evidence that physicians were STILL failing to report up to 99% of serious
adverse reactions to MEDICATIONS - and this inspite of the fact that such
reports are "essential" for determining the safety of medications. [Kessler
DA. Introducing MEDWatch: a new approach to reporting medication and device
adverse effects and product problems. JAMA (Jun2)1993;269(21):2765-68]
....I mention the potential 99% failure-to-report rate for MEDICATIONS
because CDC's Vaccination Information Sheets compare safety of medications
(unknown) with safety of vaccinations (unknown).
....[W]e must ask ourselves: What *were* ACA and AMA "dialoguing" about in
the 70s and 80s?
What business did ACA's Rosenfeld have exhorting DCs to do what an estimated
81% (perhaps more) of them didn't want to do? ([NOTE:] When DCs are finally
truly
informed regarding CDC's sordid adverse event reporting behavior
http://www.compleatmother.com/belkin_1.htm - the percent opposed to
MANDATORY
vaccination will likely be closer to 100%.)
I submit that in October 1986 Mr. Rosenfeld and the ACA were currying favor
with AMA at an extremely critical time in the pharmaceutical industry's
effort to win from Congress immunity from liability for themselves and MDs
for vaccine injuries and deaths.
I submit further that the MD-dominated HHS was not prosecuting obvious DC
health fraud - known about in 1972 and "officially" discovered in 1986 - to
offer DCs a reason to be silent - as organized medicine went for immunity
from liability for mass vaccination behavior.
The current HCFA lawsuit may have little to do with justice and much
to do with attempted HHS political payola for ACA - for its vaccination
silence in 1986 - for its vaccination cheerleading in 1993 - and for silence
as hep B is exposed as a grisly HHS/CDC fraud. Again, see...
http://www.compleatmother.com/belkin_1.htm
ATTENTION...
Judge Stanley S. Harris
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Wilma Lewis
U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia
Re: CASE NO. 98-2762 (ACA v. Shalala)
Judge Harris, two perpetrators/perpetuators of health fraud are playing
games in your
courtroom.
*************U.S. Attorney Wilma Lewis, your client, HHS Secretary Shalala
is going along with a longstanding radiation robbery/health fraud which was
INTENDED to sabotage chiropractic... See "Radiation is NOT a tool of
managed care".
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=68705f%244rg%241%40gte1.gte.net
DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE
Look closely at the words of one U.S. Attorney in regard to health fraud...
"The purpose of the law is to single out...PROVIDERS who recklessly or with
****deliberate indifference*** allow fraudulent billing practices to occur
or continue." (emphases added)
http://www.usdoj.gov/01whatsnew/hcffraud2.htm
What about **PAYORS**?!
What about "deliberate indifference" of the payor with the mostest -
HHS/HCFA?
HHS/HCFA exhibits "deliberate indifference" and "allow[s] fraudulent billing
practices to occur or continue" - thus encouraging more DC health fraud...
According to the U.S. Attorney,
"A person who [knowingly] SUBMITS a false claim to the United States may be
liable for a civil penalty of between $5,000 and $10,000, and up to three
times the amount of damages sustained. The [False Claims Act] defines
"knowingly" to
mean that a person (1) has actual knowledge of the information; (2) acts in
deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; or, (3)
acts in
reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. "
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/txw/hcf.htm
Might not PAYORS like HHS/HCFA be liable for knowingly PAYING false claims??
Paraphrasing the U.S. Attorney: (1) DHHS (HCFA) has actual knowledge of the
information (and had it in 1986; see above); (2) DHHS (HCFA) acts in
deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; and (3)
DHHS (HCFA) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the
information...
DHHS (HCFA) is guilty of MASSIVE health fraud.
The fraud was engineered by MDs working at DHHS; and McAndrewsACA has
well-documented their skullduggery...
http://www.amerchiro.org/hot_topics/amended_complaint.html
MDs have been patsies for the pharmaceutical companies since before Nelson
Rockefeller, grandson of John D., Sr. the original "scientific" medicine
gagster, left DHEW to become President Eisenhower's special assistant for
Psychological Warfare.
We MUST re-read McAndrewsACA's allegation,
[i]
>>>>This Amended Complaint alleges that the Department of Health and Human
Services ("HHS") acting through its Health Care Financing Administration
("HCFA") has failed to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed"
(U.S. Constitution, Article II, Sec. 3)...<<<<
http://www.amerchiro.org/hot_topics/amended_complaint.html
HHS has been playing chiropractic like a fiddle...
HHS likely WANTS the chiros to win this one - because organized
chiropractic's silence on the vaccination issue is SO important as CDC/HepB
fraud is exposed...
HHS/CDC knows there may be a LOT of Lyla Belkins dying from hep B
vaccinations...
http://www.compleatmother.com/belkin_1.htm
Meanwhile ACA's EP Cianciulli, DC shouts that the ONLY thing that matters is
that "we" WIN the McAndrewsACA lawsuit..
How can "we" win when HCFA is right, i.e., there is NO law which states that
HCFA must pay *ONLY DCs* for manual manipulation of the spine to correct
vertebral subluxations demonstrated on x-ray?
How can "we" win?
Easy.
HHS has HUGE itches which need scratching - and U.S. Attorney Wilma A. Lewis
*may* be the right person to look the other way - at least one DC
councilmember reportedly thinks so...
At-Large Councilmember David Catania writes:
"You can steal millions of dollars from the District government in terms of
Medicaid fraud, and the U.S. Attorney's office equivocates as to whether it
will prosecute..."
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/archives/lips/1998/lips1204.html
Other people, including a spokesperson for U.S. Attorney Lewis disagree with
Councilmember Catania's assessment.
I hope they are right.
I hope that U.S. Attorney Wilma Lewis will FIRST go after the OBVIOUSLY
ILLEGAL use of radiation as a tool of managed care....
>>>>END substantial excerpt of...
U.S. Atty Lewis/HepB/Homebirth/Osborn/Souls of Squatting Amazonians
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/26
Thanks for reading, everyone,
Sincerely,
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo
***This Open Letter will be instantly archived for global access on the
UNcensored version of chirolist...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2139
Within 24 hours it
will be in the google archive. Search
http://groups.google.com for "Chiros might as well be injecting vaccinations
themselves"
of vaccinations - as long as parents have a true CHOICE.
In this regard, I want chiros to unite and stop organized medicine's obvious
Exclusion Day vaccination fraud...
See EXCLUSION DAY VACCINATION FRAUD - will Rep. Donald Manzullo (R-Ill) help
expose it?
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2119
I also want chiros to unite and stop organized medicine's practice of
closing birth canals and gruesomely (sometimes fatally) manipulating most
babies' spines at birth.
See Pregnant chiro patients: BIZARRE chiro legislation - babies be damned...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2135
CHIROS: I would like to see ACA/ICA/WCA/FSCO unity on these issues by the
Sept. 16, 2003 ACA House of Delegates meeting in Albuquerque...
Onward...
CHIROS MIGHT AS WELL BE INJECTING VACCINATIONS THEMSELVES...
Chiropractors LOST (big) in Wilk v. AMA...
The US Supreme Court ignored its own precedent and let Judge Susan
Getzendanner deny DCs protection under the Sherman Act...
See U.S. Atty Lewis/HepB/Homebirth/Osborn/Souls of Squatting Amazonians
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/26
MASS VACCINATION liability of MDs may be the reason WHY chiropractors lost
(big) in Wilk v. AMA...
>>>>BEGIN substantial excerpt of...
U.S. Atty Lewis/HepB/Homebirth/Osborn/Souls of Squatting Amazonians
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/26
n the last quarter of 1986, ACA Attorney Rosenfeld wrote,
"Chiropractic must join the 'real world' by ceasing opposition to
innoculation..." [Rosenfeld ACA Journal Oct 1986]
The last quarter of 1986 just happened to coincide with a "marked struggle"
by MDs and PharmCo's to cause Congress to give them virtual immunity from
liability for their mass vaccination behavior...[Smith MH. National
Childhood Vaccine Injury Compensation Act. Pediatrics. 1988;82(2):264-9]
The "last quarter of 1986" ALSO just preceded a key 1987 Congressional
battle
for FUNDING the vaccine injury act...
Smith [1988] notes that "there were powerful opponents to a mandatory
system" back in 1983...
1983 was when PharmCo's and MDs asked Congress for TOTAL immunity from
liability - for a system wherein families of vaccine-injured and
vaccine-dead children could NOT go to court after being forced through the
regulatory process by the new
system. [Smith 1988:268]
[1983 also happened to be the year a new trial was ordered in Wilk v.
AMA...but the new trial did not get underway until 1987...see below...]
[Fast forward to] the last quarter of 1986...the MDs and PharmCo's were on
their
SECOND try...Smith [1988] wrote:
"The only means of avoiding a complete new beginning of the legislation
again in the 100th Congress was to agree that the funding provisions of the
legislation be omitted from consideration...[and]...taken up the next
year..."
Smith [1988] notes that the 100th Congress convened in January 1987...
1987 (May) just happened to be the moment in time when Judge Susan
Getzendanner decided to convene a non-jury trial - FOUR YEARS after a trial
was ordered.
On August 24, 1987 - as Congress was funding the MD's immunity from
vaccine liability program - Judge Getzendanner was ordering the AMA to
publicize in JAMA the AMA's "loss" to the chiropractors. [Wilk v. AMA, 671
F. Supp. 1465]
In December 1987, the vaccine injury act was passed by Congress and signed
by the President.
On January 1, 1988, under Judge Getzendanner's court order, the AMA
published news of the Getzendanner verdict in JAMA.
Has anyone else wondered why the Wilk v. AMA case was suddenly
resurrected in May 1987 - FOUR YEARS after the new trial was ordered in
1983?
Probably just another coincidence, right?
Remember the new trial was ordered back in 1983 when MDs and PharmCo's were
making their FIRST attempt at virtual immunity from liability for their mass
vaccination behavior...
DCs AMONG "POWERFUL OPPONENTS"?
According to Smith [1988], "it became evident early in these [1983]
efforts that there were powerful opponents to a mandatory
system...furthermore, Congress made it clear that they simply would not
consider a system that precluded some opportunity to go to court."
What if it **DCs** were among the "powerful opponents" in 1983?
Even if DCs *weren't* "powerful opponents*, who ARE the "powerful
opponents"?
I ask because 81% of DCs *might* just have something in common with
"powerful opponents." (The 81% estimate comes from Haas and Colley [JMPT
1994:585],
"Eighty-one percent [of DCs surveyed] felt that immunization should be
strictly voluntary")
....MASSIVE health fraud...committed by organized
medicine...
Smith [1988] notes: "[R]eporting requirements HAD TO BE ACCEPTED in the
process of negotiations through the years..." (emphasis added)
Smith [1988] also notes: "Congress had DEMANDED the
inclusion of the reaction reporting requirements as a condition of the
legislation. It will give a better epidemiologic store of information
concerning the real facts in vaccine reactions than we have ever had
before."
....Congress had to DEMAND that MDs
report serious vaccine reactions?
Even stranger: In 1993, then-FDA Commissioner David Kessler, MD offered
evidence that physicians were STILL failing to report up to 99% of serious
adverse reactions to MEDICATIONS - and this inspite of the fact that such
reports are "essential" for determining the safety of medications. [Kessler
DA. Introducing MEDWatch: a new approach to reporting medication and device
adverse effects and product problems. JAMA (Jun2)1993;269(21):2765-68]
....I mention the potential 99% failure-to-report rate for MEDICATIONS
because CDC's Vaccination Information Sheets compare safety of medications
(unknown) with safety of vaccinations (unknown).
....[W]e must ask ourselves: What *were* ACA and AMA "dialoguing" about in
the 70s and 80s?
What business did ACA's Rosenfeld have exhorting DCs to do what an estimated
81% (perhaps more) of them didn't want to do? ([NOTE:] When DCs are finally
truly
informed regarding CDC's sordid adverse event reporting behavior
http://www.compleatmother.com/belkin_1.htm - the percent opposed to
MANDATORY
vaccination will likely be closer to 100%.)
I submit that in October 1986 Mr. Rosenfeld and the ACA were currying favor
with AMA at an extremely critical time in the pharmaceutical industry's
effort to win from Congress immunity from liability for themselves and MDs
for vaccine injuries and deaths.
I submit further that the MD-dominated HHS was not prosecuting obvious DC
health fraud - known about in 1972 and "officially" discovered in 1986 - to
offer DCs a reason to be silent - as organized medicine went for immunity
from liability for mass vaccination behavior.
The current HCFA lawsuit may have little to do with justice and much
to do with attempted HHS political payola for ACA - for its vaccination
silence in 1986 - for its vaccination cheerleading in 1993 - and for silence
as hep B is exposed as a grisly HHS/CDC fraud. Again, see...
http://www.compleatmother.com/belkin_1.htm
ATTENTION...
Judge Stanley S. Harris
U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
Wilma Lewis
U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia
Re: CASE NO. 98-2762 (ACA v. Shalala)
Judge Harris, two perpetrators/perpetuators of health fraud are playing
games in your
courtroom.
*************U.S. Attorney Wilma Lewis, your client, HHS Secretary Shalala
is going along with a longstanding radiation robbery/health fraud which was
INTENDED to sabotage chiropractic... See "Radiation is NOT a tool of
managed care".
http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=68705f%244rg%241%40gte1.gte.net
DELIBERATE INDIFFERENCE
Look closely at the words of one U.S. Attorney in regard to health fraud...
"The purpose of the law is to single out...PROVIDERS who recklessly or with
****deliberate indifference*** allow fraudulent billing practices to occur
or continue." (emphases added)
http://www.usdoj.gov/01whatsnew/hcffraud2.htm
What about **PAYORS**?!
What about "deliberate indifference" of the payor with the mostest -
HHS/HCFA?
HHS/HCFA exhibits "deliberate indifference" and "allow[s] fraudulent billing
practices to occur or continue" - thus encouraging more DC health fraud...
According to the U.S. Attorney,
"A person who [knowingly] SUBMITS a false claim to the United States may be
liable for a civil penalty of between $5,000 and $10,000, and up to three
times the amount of damages sustained. The [False Claims Act] defines
"knowingly" to
mean that a person (1) has actual knowledge of the information; (2) acts in
deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; or, (3)
acts in
reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the information. "
http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/txw/hcf.htm
Might not PAYORS like HHS/HCFA be liable for knowingly PAYING false claims??
Paraphrasing the U.S. Attorney: (1) DHHS (HCFA) has actual knowledge of the
information (and had it in 1986; see above); (2) DHHS (HCFA) acts in
deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity of the information; and (3)
DHHS (HCFA) acts in reckless disregard of the truth or falsity of the
information...
DHHS (HCFA) is guilty of MASSIVE health fraud.
The fraud was engineered by MDs working at DHHS; and McAndrewsACA has
well-documented their skullduggery...
http://www.amerchiro.org/hot_topics/amended_complaint.html
MDs have been patsies for the pharmaceutical companies since before Nelson
Rockefeller, grandson of John D., Sr. the original "scientific" medicine
gagster, left DHEW to become President Eisenhower's special assistant for
Psychological Warfare.
We MUST re-read McAndrewsACA's allegation,
[i]
>>>>This Amended Complaint alleges that the Department of Health and Human
Services ("HHS") acting through its Health Care Financing Administration
("HCFA") has failed to "take care that the laws be faithfully executed"
(U.S. Constitution, Article II, Sec. 3)...<<<<
http://www.amerchiro.org/hot_topics/amended_complaint.html
HHS has been playing chiropractic like a fiddle...
HHS likely WANTS the chiros to win this one - because organized
chiropractic's silence on the vaccination issue is SO important as CDC/HepB
fraud is exposed...
HHS/CDC knows there may be a LOT of Lyla Belkins dying from hep B
vaccinations...
http://www.compleatmother.com/belkin_1.htm
Meanwhile ACA's EP Cianciulli, DC shouts that the ONLY thing that matters is
that "we" WIN the McAndrewsACA lawsuit..
How can "we" win when HCFA is right, i.e., there is NO law which states that
HCFA must pay *ONLY DCs* for manual manipulation of the spine to correct
vertebral subluxations demonstrated on x-ray?
How can "we" win?
Easy.
HHS has HUGE itches which need scratching - and U.S. Attorney Wilma A. Lewis
*may* be the right person to look the other way - at least one DC
councilmember reportedly thinks so...
At-Large Councilmember David Catania writes:
"You can steal millions of dollars from the District government in terms of
Medicaid fraud, and the U.S. Attorney's office equivocates as to whether it
will prosecute..."
http://www.washingtoncitypaper.com/archives/lips/1998/lips1204.html
Other people, including a spokesperson for U.S. Attorney Lewis disagree with
Councilmember Catania's assessment.
I hope they are right.
I hope that U.S. Attorney Wilma Lewis will FIRST go after the OBVIOUSLY
ILLEGAL use of radiation as a tool of managed care....
>>>>END substantial excerpt of...
U.S. Atty Lewis/HepB/Homebirth/Osborn/Souls of Squatting Amazonians
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/26
Thanks for reading, everyone,
Sincerely,
Todd
Dr. Gastaldo
***This Open Letter will be instantly archived for global access on the
UNcensored version of chirolist...
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/chiro-list/message/2139
Within 24 hours it
will be in the google archive. Search
http://groups.google.com for "Chiros might as well be injecting vaccinations
themselves"