PDA

View Full Version : Measles Vaccine Undeniably Linked to Autism

john
June 15th 06, 05:48 PM
Measles Vaccine Undeniably Linked to Autism
http://www.mercola.com/2006/jun/15/measles_vaccine_undeniably_linked_to_autism.htm
Vaccine-man
June 19th 06, 06:21 PM
john wrote:
> Measles Vaccine Undeniably Linked to Autism
> http://www.mercola.com/2006/jun/15/measles_vaccine_undeniably_linked_to_autism.htm

This work doesn't show up in PubMed. Can you provide us with the
reference to the peer-reviewed literature that supports this assertion?
john
June 19th 06, 09:01 PM
"Vaccine-man" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> john wrote:
>> Measles Vaccine Undeniably Linked to Autism
>> http://www.mercola.com/2006/jun/15/measles_vaccine_undeniably_linked_to_autism.htm
>
> This work doesn't show up in PubMed. Can you provide us with the
> reference to the peer-reviewed literature that supports this assertion?
>

yawn http://www.whale.to/w/journals1.html
Vaccine-man
June 20th 06, 02:19 PM
john wrote:
> "Vaccine-man" > wrote in message
> oups.com...
> >
> > john wrote:
> >> Measles Vaccine Undeniably Linked to Autism
> >> http://www.mercola.com/2006/jun/15/measles_vaccine_undeniably_linked_to_autism.htm
> >
> > This work doesn't show up in PubMed. Can you provide us with the
> > reference to the peer-reviewed literature that supports this assertion?
> >
>
> yawn http://www.whale.to/w/journals1.html

In other words, you don't believe in scientific evidence - unless, of
course, it agrees with your agenda.
Mark Probert
June 20th 06, 07:19 PM
Vaccine-man wrote:
> john wrote:
>> "Vaccine-man" > wrote in message
>> oups.com...
>>> john wrote:
>>>> Measles Vaccine Undeniably Linked to Autism
>>>> http://www.mercola.com/2006/jun/15/measles_vaccine_undeniably_linked_to_autism.htm
>>> This work doesn't show up in PubMed. Can you provide us with the
>>> reference to the peer-reviewed literature that supports this assertion?
>>>
>> yawn http://www.whale.to/w/journals1.html
>
> In other words, you don't believe in scientific evidence - unless, of
> course, it agrees with your agenda.

Since his agenda is not based on scientific evidence, there is no
scientific evidence that John believes in.