Mark Probert
August 6th 06, 05:05 PM
The sad story of Ester Figueroa, killed by Hulda Clark. Every false
allegation against Dr. Barrett, and false claim made that Mrs. Figueroa
had tried conventional medicine is addressed, AND REFUTED:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/34e39b95deb99973?hl=en&
http://tinyurl.com/eplna
A summary of the case:
You misunderstand. Mrs. Figueroa was a very ill woman who apparently tried
Hulda Cure for All Diseases and was snot successful. Here is the true story:
The civil case was filed by Esther and Jose Figueroa of New York City
against Clark, the Dr. Clark Research Association, Century Nutrition, and
several associated individuals. Mrs. Figueroa, who had been medically
diagnosed with breast cancer, sought treatment in September 1998. The court
papers state that she was told:
Dust from her apartment was responsible for her breast cancer.
Returning to her apartment would place her at special risk to develop
leukemia because of her blood type.
She had asbestos, lead, and a lot of copper in her system.
The Syncrometer detected a parasite called "rabbit fluke" inside her breast.
She also had E. coli, asbestos, and salmonella due to improper food
sterilization.
Several teeth should be removed and "cavitations" in her lower jaw should be
scraped out.
The suit also charged that:
Clark subsequently arranged for all of Mrs. Figueroa's front and molar teeth
to be removed, prescribed more than 30 dietary and herbal supplements to be
taken during a 12-week period, and badly burned her breast while
administering treatment with a "Zapper" device.
During the 3-month period of treatment, the tumor increased from 1.5 cm to
14 cm.
Despite this fact, Mrs. Figueroa was falsely told that she was getting
better, that tests for "cancer markers" were negative, and that pain she was
experiencing did not reflect persistence of her cancer.
In 2001, the Figueroa family indicated to their attorney (Christopher Grell)
that undergoing a deposition would be too stressful for Mrs. Figueroa. Mr.
Grell therefore petitioned the court to withdraw from the case, and the case
ended shortly afterward. One of the defendants (Self Health Resource Center,
operated by Clark's son Geoffrey) then sued Grell and two associates for
malicious prosecution and abuse of process. Grell responded with a motion to
dismiss, which was granted and upheld on appeal, with an award of costs and
attorneys fees to Grell. The Court of Appeal concluded:
The evidence amply supports a reasonable belief on the part of these
defendants [Grell and associates] that plaintiff [the Self Health Resource
Center] was part of a network of persons and entities who acted recklessly,
at best, luring Mrs. Figueroa into a bizarre, grotesque, and extremely
expensive regimen of "alternative" cancer treatments which has no effect
other than to exhaust the Figueroa's life savings and divert Mrs. Figueroa
from conventional treatments, thereby reducing her prospects for recovery
and survival [15].
15. Sepulveda J. Decision of the Court of Appeal of the State of
California,First Appellate District, Division Four, in Self Health
Resource Center v Christopher Grell et al. A098285 (Alameda County
Superior Court No. 2001-030441). Filed May 19, 2003.
The case was eventually dismissed as Mrs. Figueroa was too ill to travel
to court ordered depositions in California. Hulda's Henchmen had managed
to drag the case out knowing that her medical condition would
deteriorate to that point.
If anyone claims that this is an innacurate summary, or that Mrs.
Figueroa had tried conventional treatment before the quackery, they
should be prepared to prove it.
allegation against Dr. Barrett, and false claim made that Mrs. Figueroa
had tried conventional medicine is addressed, AND REFUTED:
http://groups.google.com/group/misc.health.alternative/msg/34e39b95deb99973?hl=en&
http://tinyurl.com/eplna
A summary of the case:
You misunderstand. Mrs. Figueroa was a very ill woman who apparently tried
Hulda Cure for All Diseases and was snot successful. Here is the true story:
The civil case was filed by Esther and Jose Figueroa of New York City
against Clark, the Dr. Clark Research Association, Century Nutrition, and
several associated individuals. Mrs. Figueroa, who had been medically
diagnosed with breast cancer, sought treatment in September 1998. The court
papers state that she was told:
Dust from her apartment was responsible for her breast cancer.
Returning to her apartment would place her at special risk to develop
leukemia because of her blood type.
She had asbestos, lead, and a lot of copper in her system.
The Syncrometer detected a parasite called "rabbit fluke" inside her breast.
She also had E. coli, asbestos, and salmonella due to improper food
sterilization.
Several teeth should be removed and "cavitations" in her lower jaw should be
scraped out.
The suit also charged that:
Clark subsequently arranged for all of Mrs. Figueroa's front and molar teeth
to be removed, prescribed more than 30 dietary and herbal supplements to be
taken during a 12-week period, and badly burned her breast while
administering treatment with a "Zapper" device.
During the 3-month period of treatment, the tumor increased from 1.5 cm to
14 cm.
Despite this fact, Mrs. Figueroa was falsely told that she was getting
better, that tests for "cancer markers" were negative, and that pain she was
experiencing did not reflect persistence of her cancer.
In 2001, the Figueroa family indicated to their attorney (Christopher Grell)
that undergoing a deposition would be too stressful for Mrs. Figueroa. Mr.
Grell therefore petitioned the court to withdraw from the case, and the case
ended shortly afterward. One of the defendants (Self Health Resource Center,
operated by Clark's son Geoffrey) then sued Grell and two associates for
malicious prosecution and abuse of process. Grell responded with a motion to
dismiss, which was granted and upheld on appeal, with an award of costs and
attorneys fees to Grell. The Court of Appeal concluded:
The evidence amply supports a reasonable belief on the part of these
defendants [Grell and associates] that plaintiff [the Self Health Resource
Center] was part of a network of persons and entities who acted recklessly,
at best, luring Mrs. Figueroa into a bizarre, grotesque, and extremely
expensive regimen of "alternative" cancer treatments which has no effect
other than to exhaust the Figueroa's life savings and divert Mrs. Figueroa
from conventional treatments, thereby reducing her prospects for recovery
and survival [15].
15. Sepulveda J. Decision of the Court of Appeal of the State of
California,First Appellate District, Division Four, in Self Health
Resource Center v Christopher Grell et al. A098285 (Alameda County
Superior Court No. 2001-030441). Filed May 19, 2003.
The case was eventually dismissed as Mrs. Figueroa was too ill to travel
to court ordered depositions in California. Hulda's Henchmen had managed
to drag the case out knowing that her medical condition would
deteriorate to that point.
If anyone claims that this is an innacurate summary, or that Mrs.
Figueroa had tried conventional treatment before the quackery, they
should be prepared to prove it.