Mark Probert
August 9th 06, 02:46 PM
http://www.kevinleitch.co.uk/wp/index.php?p=409
"In short, CDDS numbers continue to rise in the age group that would
show a dramatic drop if thiomersal was the culprit."
http://autismnaturalvariation.blogspot.com/2006/07/cdds-q2-2006-what-will-david-kirby-do.html
Back in November, 2005, David Kirby had a discussion with Citizen Cain
about the correct interpretation of the California DDS numbers. Citizen
Cain explained that 'entries' or 'new cases' and 'net gain' are not the
same thing. To avoid confusion, Citizen Cain proposed using the 3-5
cohort caseload as a gauge of incidence. Clearly, any incidence drops
should reflect quickly in that cohort. David Kirby apparently understood
Citizen Cain's analysis and finally agreed to the following:
If the total number of 3-5 year olds in the California DDS system has
not declined by 2007, that would deal a severe blow to the
autism-thimerosal hypothesis.
Why is David Kirby silent?
"In short, CDDS numbers continue to rise in the age group that would
show a dramatic drop if thiomersal was the culprit."
http://autismnaturalvariation.blogspot.com/2006/07/cdds-q2-2006-what-will-david-kirby-do.html
Back in November, 2005, David Kirby had a discussion with Citizen Cain
about the correct interpretation of the California DDS numbers. Citizen
Cain explained that 'entries' or 'new cases' and 'net gain' are not the
same thing. To avoid confusion, Citizen Cain proposed using the 3-5
cohort caseload as a gauge of incidence. Clearly, any incidence drops
should reflect quickly in that cohort. David Kirby apparently understood
Citizen Cain's analysis and finally agreed to the following:
If the total number of 3-5 year olds in the California DDS system has
not declined by 2007, that would deal a severe blow to the
autism-thimerosal hypothesis.
Why is David Kirby silent?