Re: R R RR R R ,,,,

[Greegor]

> Come on, Greg. You brought him here
> to bring that kind of chaos to this newsgroup.

Like when you gratuitously posted obscenity for a year? Nope.

> You are simply a lying stupid piece of crap, Greg.
> No one misses that, not even the other lying stupid
> pieces of crap that have joined you here.

UNFAIR! That violates Roberts Rules Of Order! Whaaa!

[0:->]

Greegor wrote:
> > Come on, Greg. You brought him here
> > to bring that kind of chaos to this newsgroup.
>
> Like when you gratuitously posted obscenity for a year? Nope.
>
> > You are simply a lying stupid piece of crap, Greg.
> > No one misses that, not even the other lying stupid
> > pieces of crap that have joined you here.
>
> UNFAIR! That violates Roberts Rules Of Order! Whaaa!

I wasn't aware you had challenged me to a debate, formally.

Are you?

As to the rules where we are in this exchange....it's the usual thread
open to all with a mob scene screeching.

On what subject would you like to meet me singly, stick to RRO, and
proceed with debate, Greg?

Here I am.

Pick a newsgroup. Pick a subject. Open with your challenge.

I'm waiting.

Kane

[Greegor]

Kane you violate the rules of civility constantly on here.
My Grandma what big TEETH you have!

> Greegor wrote:
> > > Come on, Greg. You brought him here
> > > to bring that kind of chaos to this newsgroup.
> >
> > Like when you gratuitously posted obscenity for a year? Nope.
> >
> > > You are simply a lying stupid piece of crap, Greg.
> > > No one misses that, not even the other lying stupid
> > > pieces of crap that have joined you here.

Are you now DENYING your year of posting profanity?

> > UNFAIR! That violates Roberts Rules Of Order! Whaaa!
>
> I wasn't aware you had challenged me to a debate, formally.
> Are you?
> As to the rules where we are in this exchange....it's the usual thread
> open to all with a mob scene screeching.
> On what subject would you like to meet me singly, stick to RRO, and
> proceed with debate, Greg?
> Here I am.
> Pick a newsgroup. Pick a subject. Open with your challenge.
> I'm waiting.
> Kane

You fancy the barbaric bombastic crap you do as debate? Insane.

All you do is act out some weird catharsis, some lingering tantrum.

[Dan Sullivan]

Greegor wrote:
> Kane you violate the rules of civility constantly on here.
> My Grandma what big TEETH you have!
>
> > Greegor wrote:
> > > > Come on, Greg. You brought him here
> > > > to bring that kind of chaos to this newsgroup.
> > >
> > > Like when you gratuitously posted obscenity for a year? Nope.
> > >
> > > > You are simply a lying stupid piece of crap, Greg.
> > > > No one misses that, not even the other lying stupid
> > > > pieces of crap that have joined you here.
>
> Are you now DENYING your year of posting profanity?

What's a year of posting naughty words compared to SIX YEARS of a
mother not having custody of her own daughter, Greg?

[0:->]

Greegor wrote:
> Kane you violate the rules of civility constantly on here.
> My Grandma what big TEETH you have!
>
>> Greegor wrote:
>>>> Come on, Greg. You brought him here
>>>> to bring that kind of chaos to this newsgroup.
>>> Like when you gratuitously posted obscenity for a year? Nope.
>>>
>>>> You are simply a lying stupid piece of crap, Greg.
>>>> No one misses that, not even the other lying stupid
>>>> pieces of crap that have joined you here.
>
> Are you now DENYING your year of posting profanity?

How would my statement that you are crap that lies mean I am denying my
profanity?

Everyone here has seen me post my reasons for doing so and your refusal
to respond to the foul fern's offenses.

>>> UNFAIR! That violates Roberts Rules Of Order! Whaaa!
>> I wasn't aware you had challenged me to a debate, formally.
>> Are you?
>> As to the rules where we are in this exchange....it's the usual thread
>> open to all with a mob scene screeching.
>> On what subject would you like to meet me singly, stick to RRO, and
>> proceed with debate, Greg?
>> Here I am.
>> Pick a newsgroup. Pick a subject. Open with your challenge.
>> I'm waiting.
>> Kane
>
> You fancy the barbaric bombastic crap you do as debate? Insane.

In other words you won't debate. Figured.

> All you do is act out some weird catharsis, some lingering tantrum.

Nope. You've seen me debate, until the opponent starts with the lies,
just like you are doing now.

Tell you what.

PROVE your claim that "You fancy the barbaric bombastic crap you do as
debate? Insane."

By taking up the challenge.

Open a debate with me with the simple terms that levels the playing field.

If I do indeed do as you claim, then you will have proof.

Willing?

R R R R R naw, you will run again, coward, just as the coward Ken ran
and lied about it.

0:->

[Ron]

"0:->" > wrote in message
news:_OqdnaTQcodk6C_YnZ2dnUVZ_tyinZ2d@scnresearch. com...
> Greegor wrote:
>> Kane you violate the rules of civility constantly on here.
>> My Grandma what big TEETH you have!
>>
>>> Greegor wrote:
>>>>> Come on, Greg. You brought him here
>>>>> to bring that kind of chaos to this newsgroup.
>>>> Like when you gratuitously posted obscenity for a year? Nope.
>>>>
>>>>> You are simply a lying stupid piece of crap, Greg.
>>>>> No one misses that, not even the other lying stupid
>>>>> pieces of crap that have joined you here.
>>
>> Are you now DENYING your year of posting profanity?
>
> How would my statement that you are crap that lies mean I am denying my
> profanity?
>
> Everyone here has seen me post my reasons for doing so and your refusal to
> respond to the foul fern's offenses.
>
>>>> UNFAIR! That violates Roberts Rules Of Order! Whaaa!
>>> I wasn't aware you had challenged me to a debate, formally.
>>> Are you?
>>> As to the rules where we are in this exchange....it's the usual thread
>>> open to all with a mob scene screeching.
>>> On what subject would you like to meet me singly, stick to RRO, and
>>> proceed with debate, Greg?
>>> Here I am.
>>> Pick a newsgroup. Pick a subject. Open with your challenge.
>>> I'm waiting.
>>> Kane
>>
>> You fancy the barbaric bombastic crap you do as debate? Insane.
>
> In other words you won't debate. Figured.
>
>> All you do is act out some weird catharsis, some lingering tantrum.
>
> Nope. You've seen me debate, until the opponent starts with the lies, just
> like you are doing now.
>
> Tell you what.
>
> PROVE your claim that "You fancy the barbaric bombastic crap you do as
> debate? Insane."
>
> By taking up the challenge.
>
> Open a debate with me with the simple terms that levels the playing field.
>
> If I do indeed do as you claim, then you will have proof.
>
> Willing?
>
> R R R R R naw, you will run again, coward, just as the coward Ken ran and
> lied about it.

Has ken actually run?

Someone kindly tell me what it is that we did that drove that pathetic dolt
off! Maybe we can use it on gregg, and finally get this news group back to
its purpose for being.

Ron

[0:->]

Ron wrote:
> "0:->" > wrote in message
> news:_OqdnaTQcodk6C_YnZ2dnUVZ_tyinZ2d@scnresearch. com...
>> Greegor wrote:
>>> Kane you violate the rules of civility constantly on here.
>>> My Grandma what big TEETH you have!
>>>
>>>> Greegor wrote:
>>>>>> Come on, Greg. You brought him here
>>>>>> to bring that kind of chaos to this newsgroup.
>>>>> Like when you gratuitously posted obscenity for a year? Nope.
>>>>>
>>>>>> You are simply a lying stupid piece of crap, Greg.
>>>>>> No one misses that, not even the other lying stupid
>>>>>> pieces of crap that have joined you here.
>>> Are you now DENYING your year of posting profanity?
>> How would my statement that you are crap that lies mean I am denying my
>> profanity?
>>
>> Everyone here has seen me post my reasons for doing so and your refusal to
>> respond to the foul fern's offenses.
>>
>>>>> UNFAIR! That violates Roberts Rules Of Order! Whaaa!
>>>> I wasn't aware you had challenged me to a debate, formally.
>>>> Are you?
>>>> As to the rules where we are in this exchange....it's the usual thread
>>>> open to all with a mob scene screeching.
>>>> On what subject would you like to meet me singly, stick to RRO, and
>>>> proceed with debate, Greg?
>>>> Here I am.
>>>> Pick a newsgroup. Pick a subject. Open with your challenge.
>>>> I'm waiting.
>>>> Kane
>>> You fancy the barbaric bombastic crap you do as debate? Insane.
>> In other words you won't debate. Figured.
>>
>>> All you do is act out some weird catharsis, some lingering tantrum.
>> Nope. You've seen me debate, until the opponent starts with the lies, just
>> like you are doing now.
>>
>> Tell you what.
>>
>> PROVE your claim that "You fancy the barbaric bombastic crap you do as
>> debate? Insane."
>>
>> By taking up the challenge.
>>
>> Open a debate with me with the simple terms that levels the playing field.
>>
>> If I do indeed do as you claim, then you will have proof.
>>
>> Willing?
>>
>> R R R R R naw, you will run again, coward, just as the coward Ken ran and
>> lied about it.
>
> Has ken actually run?
>
> Someone kindly tell me what it is that we did that drove that pathetic dolt
> off! Maybe we can use it on gregg, and finally get this news group back to
> its purpose for being.

Fat chance. Has anyone ever explained narcissism to you?

Greg's not going to leave.

Look at the pattern.

He claims he is and has always been a Parent's Rights advocate.

But oddly enough he draws considerable attention to himself by the
controversial method of attacking that very class of folks that read and
post here.

The dichotomy is not explainable by many means. I tend to look at it
through a mental health view first.

But I do look at it in other ways as well.

He talks about False Flag operation.

Isn't it rather funny that he appears to be running one?

He's "against CPS," yet he attacks those that are against CPS?

That is a nice cover for someone that in fact represents CPS here, don't
you think?

Look at his implied threat to report Firemonkey to CPS and get her kids
taken away. That was just today.

I can't help but assume he wants us to believe he is on his girlfriend's
side, but note, as far back as the early days of her case with CPS Greg,
a central player in why the child was removed, harassed workers,
harassed a parent trainer sabotaging her teaching, created a "pleading"
that could not do anything but make the court, and CPS, think they were
right about him and he was a danger to a child.

He attacked the state of Iowa with a flat out lie that suggested they
had misappropriated federal funds for the creation and maintaining of
CRB offices...but in fact, the did as required by federal guidelines and
had all those offices in place, even as he testified to the US congress
FALSELY.

He refuses to discuss with me.

Something is fishy here, Ron, and it's decidedly raising a miasma over
the posts of Greg and some of his buddies.

Just WHO the hell are they, if not agents of the state in some manner,
or worse, some opponents of the state who are willing to take down
innocent parents and their children to "make their point?"

This group, ascps, stinks of their manipulations and attempts to
undermine parents and others trying to do the right thing.

>
> Ron
>

No, Ron, either he's got a destructive agenda going, or he's got a date
with a shrink he'll never keep.

Kane

[krp]

"0:->" > wrote in message
ups.com...
>
> Greegor wrote:
>> > Come on, Greg. You brought him here
>> > to bring that kind of chaos to this newsgroup.
>>
>> Like when you gratuitously posted obscenity for a year? Nope.
>>
>> > You are simply a lying stupid piece of crap, Greg.
>> > No one misses that, not even the other lying stupid
>> > pieces of crap that have joined you here.
>>
>> UNFAIR! That violates Roberts Rules Of Order! Whaaa!
>
> I wasn't aware you had challenged me to a debate, formally.
>
> Are you?
>
> As to the rules where we are in this exchange....it's the usual thread
> open to all with a mob scene screeching.
>
> On what subject would you like to meet me singly, stick to RRO, and
> proceed with debate, Greg?
>
> Here I am.
>
> Pick a newsgroup. Pick a subject. Open with your challenge.


I picked THIS ONE AND RIGHT now Kane and you ****ed all over yourself
DEMANDING we go elsewhere!

[krp]

"0:->" > wrote in message
news:_OqdnaTQcodk6C_YnZ2dnUVZ_tyinZ2d@scnresearch. com...
>
> Open a debate with me with the simple terms that levels the playing field.


Roberts rules KANE-- HERE AND NOW! RUN RABBIT RUN!