Greegor
January 29th 07, 01:37 AM
Iowa Court of Appeal ruling filed Oct. 2000 find the juvenile court
acted illegally by not holding an application for ex parte removal
must be supported by oath or affirmation.
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=app
%5C20001025%5C99-0095&invol=1
Scroll down to the lower part of the ruling, you'll find:
"For the reasons stated above, we sustain that part of the writ asking
this court to find the juvenile court acted illegally by not holding
an application for ex parte removal must be supported by oath or
affirmation. We annul that part of the writ asking this court to find
the juvenile court acted illegally in not holding the underlying facts
supporting the application for ex parte removal must be in writing".
WRIT SUSTAINED IN PART AND ANNULLED IN PART
acted illegally by not holding an application for ex parte removal
must be supported by oath or affirmation.
http://caselaw.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ia&vol=app
%5C20001025%5C99-0095&invol=1
Scroll down to the lower part of the ruling, you'll find:
"For the reasons stated above, we sustain that part of the writ asking
this court to find the juvenile court acted illegally by not holding
an application for ex parte removal must be supported by oath or
affirmation. We annul that part of the writ asking this court to find
the juvenile court acted illegally in not holding the underlying facts
supporting the application for ex parte removal must be in writing".
WRIT SUSTAINED IN PART AND ANNULLED IN PART