Greegor
March 14th 07, 07:08 PM
Is this yet another Non Profit "organ" of the Child Protection
INDUSTRY?
Crimes Against Children Research center, Child Advocacy Centers
If these are like our Child Protection Center, the Video Interviewers
are NOT qualified.
In cases of actual CRIMINAL abuse, which by the way
is NOT the territory of Child Protection agencies, the
use of such substandard interviews by CPS can
actually DAMAGE the prosecution of the criminals.
Using unqualified, unlicensed, unaccredited interviewers
who fail to ask epistemology questions makes these interviews
worthless in any court other than the substandard "Kangaroo"
Juvenile courts which are basically unconstitutional
because they use the low "preponderance" 51% standard
and LIBERTY INTERESTS demand "clear and convincing" 75%
and quite possibly the higher "beyond a reasonable doubt" 95%.
A criminal case near me was almost BLOWN because
it relied on such a video interview. Fortunately (though scary)
the criminals OWN Public Defender didn't move to get
the LOUSY video interview thrown out until it was one day too late.
Instead of seeing the umpteenth grant seeking non profit
kissing up to the Child Protection INDUSTRY, wouldn't
it be nice if they actually raised the standards for video
interviewers? This non profit targets CRIMINAL child abuse
which is incompatible with what Child Protection agencies do.
Currently the interviewers are little more than stooges
for the CPS caseworkers. Ours was totally unqualified,
asked absolutely NO epistemology questions and was prompted
with questions by the caseworker through an ajar door.
Later she had a ""Lesbian Marriage"" in Iowa despite that
being illegal in Iowa. Her ex-husband was only marginally surprised.
Training on epistemology and identifying how many
interviews the child had been through previously are
crucial when it comes to these video interviews of children.
Without real qualifications and those questions on the tape,
it is generally more of a witch hunt than an "evidenciary interview".
INDUSTRY?
Crimes Against Children Research center, Child Advocacy Centers
If these are like our Child Protection Center, the Video Interviewers
are NOT qualified.
In cases of actual CRIMINAL abuse, which by the way
is NOT the territory of Child Protection agencies, the
use of such substandard interviews by CPS can
actually DAMAGE the prosecution of the criminals.
Using unqualified, unlicensed, unaccredited interviewers
who fail to ask epistemology questions makes these interviews
worthless in any court other than the substandard "Kangaroo"
Juvenile courts which are basically unconstitutional
because they use the low "preponderance" 51% standard
and LIBERTY INTERESTS demand "clear and convincing" 75%
and quite possibly the higher "beyond a reasonable doubt" 95%.
A criminal case near me was almost BLOWN because
it relied on such a video interview. Fortunately (though scary)
the criminals OWN Public Defender didn't move to get
the LOUSY video interview thrown out until it was one day too late.
Instead of seeing the umpteenth grant seeking non profit
kissing up to the Child Protection INDUSTRY, wouldn't
it be nice if they actually raised the standards for video
interviewers? This non profit targets CRIMINAL child abuse
which is incompatible with what Child Protection agencies do.
Currently the interviewers are little more than stooges
for the CPS caseworkers. Ours was totally unqualified,
asked absolutely NO epistemology questions and was prompted
with questions by the caseworker through an ajar door.
Later she had a ""Lesbian Marriage"" in Iowa despite that
being illegal in Iowa. Her ex-husband was only marginally surprised.
Training on epistemology and identifying how many
interviews the child had been through previously are
crucial when it comes to these video interviews of children.
Without real qualifications and those questions on the tape,
it is generally more of a witch hunt than an "evidenciary interview".