john[_5_]
October 30th 09, 01:25 PM
Thirteen hundred and twenty two families have won vaccine damage cases since
1988 by Christina England
June 16, 2009
http://www.americanchronicle.com:80/articles/view/106107
This weekend a news story broke about another win for a family with a three
year old little girl, who became brain damaged after the MMR. Julia a USA
citizen from Colorado won a substantial financial award in a US Federal
Court after her family proved her brain damage was caused after she had the
MMR vaccine.
Julie suffered from ENCEPHALITIS after the MMR vaccine and as she had not
been formerly diagnosed with any 'Autism' this word could not used in her
case. Another case Bailey Banks also did not have the word Autism mentioned
in his case and also won compensation.
Julia's mother has confirmed that whilst her neurologist suspected that
Julia may have Autism, Julia has never been formerly diagnosed.
"I do not want this to be misunderstood. She was never formally diagnosed.
Do I think that there is a link between vaccines and Autism, absolutely. Is
Julia Autistic? I“m not sure."
Is this going to be the way forward? Are cases only going to be won, if a
family do not have the word Autism or agree not to have the word Autism
being mentioned in their case? Since 1988 it has been revealed by CBS News
that 1322 families have received compensation for children who have brain
damage through vaccines. In the UK in 1974 a Rosemary Fox fought the
Governments for many years to have a vaccine compensation scheme in place.
She set up an organization called the 'Association for Parents of Vaccine
Damaged Children'. She fought for many years and still does today, for the
rights of all vaccine damaged children to compensation for their
disabilities. She set the organization up after her own daughter Helen
became vaccine damaged after she received the DPT. She took her complaints
all the way to the ECHR
"We had worked hard up to then. Not only to try to protect children who were
going through the vaccination process at the time unaware of possible risk
but also to raise the issue of our own damaged children, to establish their
rights and improve their provision. We had some success in 1979, five years
after we started, when, prompted by the report of the Royal Commission,
parliament passed the Vaccine Damage Payment Act to pay £10,000 to children
found 'on the balance of probabilities“ to be vaccine damaged. We regarded
it as a start but considering the extent of the injuries inflicted we did
not consider it to be equitable and we were determined to continue the
campaign with the help of all the members of parliament who had supported us
since 1974 when Jack Ashley MP, now Lord Ashley of Stoke, first debated the
issue."
Sadly the financial payments have not risen very much even with inflation
and many families still receive a inadequate £10,000 compensation reward.
That is of course if they win their case at all. In June 2000 it was
revealed that out of 4000 claims since 1979, only 890 received any money.
Alistair Darling the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer had this to say:-
"Nothing can make up for what has happened to these children, but we have a
clear duty to support them and their families."
Oh really? So how comes he is saying this only 9 years later in an article
entitled Britain pledges $485 Million to global vaccine project :-
"The UK is pleased to support this initiative ... which should ensure a
sustainable and affordable supply of vaccines well into the future,"
The problem I have with this is that Britain is in huge financial crisis at
the moment. Many of our shops and businesses are closing, there are
literally thousands of people losing their homes many more children and
elderly live in poverty with little food or heat. Our hospitals are filthy
and in desperate need of repair and yet Mr Darling is quite happy to spend a
small fortune on a global vaccine project in the full knowledge of just how
dangerous many vaccines can be and the brain damage that they can cause.
The article states very clearly:-
"LECCE, Italy (Reuters) - Britain will invest almost $500 million in an
international scheme to encourage pharmaceutical firms to develop vaccines
against some of the common diseases which plague poorer nations."
and carries on to state:-
"Britain, Italy, Canada, Russia, Norway and the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation are investing a total of $1.5 billion in the project, which is
being run by the World Bank, UNICEF, the World Health Organization and the
international vaccine agency GAVI alliance."
This is where it becomes even more interesting. The World Health
Organisation and UNICEF are closely aligned with the CAI or the Child
Advocacy International a charity run by Professor David Southall. Professor
David Southall is the disgraced British Paediatrician recently struck off at
the GMC for Professional Misconduct. Together they have formed a child
health improvement programme.
Details of the links between the organisations can be found in a manual for
health workers called Child Friendly Healthcare
"The Child Friendly Healthcare Initiative (CFHI), a child health quality
improvement program, was developed by Childhealth Advocacy International
(CAI), Charity No: 1071486, in collaboration with The United Nations
Children“s Fund (UNICEF), The Child and Adolescent Department of Health and
Development of the World Health Organisation (WHO), the Royal College of
Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH), UK and the Royal College of Nursing
(RCN), UK. The Community Fund, UK funded its pilot project".
This is what the manual says about David Southall.
"Dr. David Southall OBE MBBS MD FRCPCH
David Southall is honorary medical director of Childhealth Advocacy
International. He is the chair of the working party for CFHI. His main
interests are the safe and effective management of emergencies in pregnancy,
infancy and childhood. He has published many papers concerning the
protection of children from abuse and is active in developing child
protection systems for poorly resourced countries. He is particularly
worried about the concept of suffering and how little attention is drawn to
this in current international programs for mothers and children. He is also
active in developing palliative care systems for disadvantaged countries. He
has directed the development of many teaching materials for managing
emergencies as well as a textbook of International Child Health Care.
He is a consultant paediatrician active in acute general paediatrics in the
UK National Health Service and was Foundation Professor of Paediatrics at
Keele University before his retirement."
Last month I read an article about Dr David Southall by Lisa Blakemore-Brown
called David Southall -A very Dangerous Doctor She said that she believed Dr
Southall has been involved in vaccine trials research and is strongly linked
to the FSID (Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths) with many mothers
wrongly accused of MSBP and/or murder after experiencing cot deaths in their
children after vaccines.
It very much seems that this is all linked, maybe the palliative care
systems for disadvantaged countries is giving these children vaccines. These
children do not need vaccines to add to their problems. The money would be
more wisely spent on better sanitation, better education, food and clean
water to help them fight disease. I do not know if Dr Southall is linked to
the international scheme, to encourage pharmaceutical firms to develop
vaccines against some of the common diseases, which plague poorer nations
but given his vast amounts of work in the third world through CAI, I would
be surprised if he was not, especially after reading this from their
website, don't you agree?
Charity
CAI (Child Advocacy International) is a charity set up to help improve
healthcare for children around the world. Our special role is helping poor
countries build medical capacity for the future which we do by supporting
and educating local doctors and nurses as well as the provision of essential
and appropriate equipment.
Bamenda
Bamenda is the main town in the north-west province of Cameroon. Children
come from all over the province for treatment, some travelling a great
distance in difficult conditions. This is a Government run hospital and CAI
has been working for over two years,improving facilities, providing medical
supplies and equipment and training local medical staff."
With Governments, doctors and drug companies all working together to ensure
vaccines continue well into the future, what hope do future generations have
of being fit and healthy?
1988 by Christina England
June 16, 2009
http://www.americanchronicle.com:80/articles/view/106107
This weekend a news story broke about another win for a family with a three
year old little girl, who became brain damaged after the MMR. Julia a USA
citizen from Colorado won a substantial financial award in a US Federal
Court after her family proved her brain damage was caused after she had the
MMR vaccine.
Julie suffered from ENCEPHALITIS after the MMR vaccine and as she had not
been formerly diagnosed with any 'Autism' this word could not used in her
case. Another case Bailey Banks also did not have the word Autism mentioned
in his case and also won compensation.
Julia's mother has confirmed that whilst her neurologist suspected that
Julia may have Autism, Julia has never been formerly diagnosed.
"I do not want this to be misunderstood. She was never formally diagnosed.
Do I think that there is a link between vaccines and Autism, absolutely. Is
Julia Autistic? I“m not sure."
Is this going to be the way forward? Are cases only going to be won, if a
family do not have the word Autism or agree not to have the word Autism
being mentioned in their case? Since 1988 it has been revealed by CBS News
that 1322 families have received compensation for children who have brain
damage through vaccines. In the UK in 1974 a Rosemary Fox fought the
Governments for many years to have a vaccine compensation scheme in place.
She set up an organization called the 'Association for Parents of Vaccine
Damaged Children'. She fought for many years and still does today, for the
rights of all vaccine damaged children to compensation for their
disabilities. She set the organization up after her own daughter Helen
became vaccine damaged after she received the DPT. She took her complaints
all the way to the ECHR
"We had worked hard up to then. Not only to try to protect children who were
going through the vaccination process at the time unaware of possible risk
but also to raise the issue of our own damaged children, to establish their
rights and improve their provision. We had some success in 1979, five years
after we started, when, prompted by the report of the Royal Commission,
parliament passed the Vaccine Damage Payment Act to pay £10,000 to children
found 'on the balance of probabilities“ to be vaccine damaged. We regarded
it as a start but considering the extent of the injuries inflicted we did
not consider it to be equitable and we were determined to continue the
campaign with the help of all the members of parliament who had supported us
since 1974 when Jack Ashley MP, now Lord Ashley of Stoke, first debated the
issue."
Sadly the financial payments have not risen very much even with inflation
and many families still receive a inadequate £10,000 compensation reward.
That is of course if they win their case at all. In June 2000 it was
revealed that out of 4000 claims since 1979, only 890 received any money.
Alistair Darling the UK Chancellor of the Exchequer had this to say:-
"Nothing can make up for what has happened to these children, but we have a
clear duty to support them and their families."
Oh really? So how comes he is saying this only 9 years later in an article
entitled Britain pledges $485 Million to global vaccine project :-
"The UK is pleased to support this initiative ... which should ensure a
sustainable and affordable supply of vaccines well into the future,"
The problem I have with this is that Britain is in huge financial crisis at
the moment. Many of our shops and businesses are closing, there are
literally thousands of people losing their homes many more children and
elderly live in poverty with little food or heat. Our hospitals are filthy
and in desperate need of repair and yet Mr Darling is quite happy to spend a
small fortune on a global vaccine project in the full knowledge of just how
dangerous many vaccines can be and the brain damage that they can cause.
The article states very clearly:-
"LECCE, Italy (Reuters) - Britain will invest almost $500 million in an
international scheme to encourage pharmaceutical firms to develop vaccines
against some of the common diseases which plague poorer nations."
and carries on to state:-
"Britain, Italy, Canada, Russia, Norway and the Bill and Melinda Gates
Foundation are investing a total of $1.5 billion in the project, which is
being run by the World Bank, UNICEF, the World Health Organization and the
international vaccine agency GAVI alliance."
This is where it becomes even more interesting. The World Health
Organisation and UNICEF are closely aligned with the CAI or the Child
Advocacy International a charity run by Professor David Southall. Professor
David Southall is the disgraced British Paediatrician recently struck off at
the GMC for Professional Misconduct. Together they have formed a child
health improvement programme.
Details of the links between the organisations can be found in a manual for
health workers called Child Friendly Healthcare
"The Child Friendly Healthcare Initiative (CFHI), a child health quality
improvement program, was developed by Childhealth Advocacy International
(CAI), Charity No: 1071486, in collaboration with The United Nations
Children“s Fund (UNICEF), The Child and Adolescent Department of Health and
Development of the World Health Organisation (WHO), the Royal College of
Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH), UK and the Royal College of Nursing
(RCN), UK. The Community Fund, UK funded its pilot project".
This is what the manual says about David Southall.
"Dr. David Southall OBE MBBS MD FRCPCH
David Southall is honorary medical director of Childhealth Advocacy
International. He is the chair of the working party for CFHI. His main
interests are the safe and effective management of emergencies in pregnancy,
infancy and childhood. He has published many papers concerning the
protection of children from abuse and is active in developing child
protection systems for poorly resourced countries. He is particularly
worried about the concept of suffering and how little attention is drawn to
this in current international programs for mothers and children. He is also
active in developing palliative care systems for disadvantaged countries. He
has directed the development of many teaching materials for managing
emergencies as well as a textbook of International Child Health Care.
He is a consultant paediatrician active in acute general paediatrics in the
UK National Health Service and was Foundation Professor of Paediatrics at
Keele University before his retirement."
Last month I read an article about Dr David Southall by Lisa Blakemore-Brown
called David Southall -A very Dangerous Doctor She said that she believed Dr
Southall has been involved in vaccine trials research and is strongly linked
to the FSID (Foundation for the Study of Infant Deaths) with many mothers
wrongly accused of MSBP and/or murder after experiencing cot deaths in their
children after vaccines.
It very much seems that this is all linked, maybe the palliative care
systems for disadvantaged countries is giving these children vaccines. These
children do not need vaccines to add to their problems. The money would be
more wisely spent on better sanitation, better education, food and clean
water to help them fight disease. I do not know if Dr Southall is linked to
the international scheme, to encourage pharmaceutical firms to develop
vaccines against some of the common diseases, which plague poorer nations
but given his vast amounts of work in the third world through CAI, I would
be surprised if he was not, especially after reading this from their
website, don't you agree?
Charity
CAI (Child Advocacy International) is a charity set up to help improve
healthcare for children around the world. Our special role is helping poor
countries build medical capacity for the future which we do by supporting
and educating local doctors and nurses as well as the provision of essential
and appropriate equipment.
Bamenda
Bamenda is the main town in the north-west province of Cameroon. Children
come from all over the province for treatment, some travelling a great
distance in difficult conditions. This is a Government run hospital and CAI
has been working for over two years,improving facilities, providing medical
supplies and equipment and training local medical staff."
With Governments, doctors and drug companies all working together to ensure
vaccines continue well into the future, what hope do future generations have
of being fit and healthy?