PDA

View Full Version : EMEA registers 38 cases of Guillian Barre and 11 cases of Multiple Scelorosis from swine flu jab


john[_5_]
January 20th 10, 06:27 AM
38 CASES OF GUILLIAN BARRÉ AND 11 CASES OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOLLOWING
VACCINATION AGAINST H1N1





By Ulla Danielsen



The European Medicines Agency (EMEA) has registered 38 cases of Guillian
Barré Syndrome, an illness with paralysations, following vaccination against
the swine flu (H1N1) since the vaccination campaign started.



Senior medical doctor, Doris Stenver, head of the department for consumer
safety at the Danish Pharmaceutical Board (Laegemiddelstyrelsen) 11 cases of
multiple sclerosis (MS) have been registered.



EMEA covers the 27 EU countries plus Norway and Iceland.



H1N1 MEETING IN COPENHAGEN



Doris Stenver participated Wednesday in an open meeting about the swine
fluat the pharmaceutical faculty at the University of Copenhagen in Denmark.



Since that meeting, the figures communicated by Doris Stenver, have had to
be revised and are higher than what was presented at the meeting Wednesday.



The vaccine Pandemrix accounts for 23 cases of Guillian Barré Syndrome in
Europe.



Concerning Focetria the European Medicines Agency (EMA) has registered 13
cases of Guillain Barré Syndrome while Celvapan accounts for two cases.



Furthermore the three types of vaccine each account for one case of
Miller-Fischer Syndrome. That is a rare, acquired nerve disease that is
considered to be a variant of Guillain-Barré syndrome.



11 CASES OF MS FOLLOWING H1N1-VACCINATION



Altogether EMEA has registered 11 cases of multiple sclerosis (MS) following
vaccination against H1N1 in Europe. Of these Pandemrix is responsible for
nine cases and Focetria for two cases.



Meanwhile, according to senior medical doctor, Doris Stenver, the prevalence
of Guillian Barré and multiple sclerosis among citizens vaccinated against
H1N1 is not causing concern, when compared with the prevalence of these
diseases in the background population.



"When you compare with background data for Europe as a whole, there is no
reason for panic, says Doris Stenver.



In Denmark a single case of suspected Guillain Barré has been registered
following vaccination. Some cases of sensory disturbances and paralysations
have also been registered but nothing like MS says, Doris Stenver.


As of January 11, 2010 32.4 million people in Europe had been vaccinated
against the swine flu.

Peter B[_2_]
January 20th 10, 07:07 AM
"john" > wrote in message
...
> 38 CASES OF GUILLIAN BARRÉ AND 11 CASES OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS
> FOLLOWING VACCINATION AGAINST H1N1
>
AND MANY HAVE DIED OF OLD AGE

50 CASES OF HEART ATTACKS

1000 CASES OF CONSTIPATION

15000 CASES IF DIARRHEA

75 CUT FINGERS

20 BROKEN ARMS

dr_jeff
January 20th 10, 11:27 AM
john wrote:
> 38 CASES OF GUILLIAN BARRÉ AND 11 CASES OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOLLOWING
> VACCINATION AGAINST H1N1

And had the vaccine not been given, there would have been 38 cases of
GBS and 11 cases of MS in the same people.

There is no evidence that GBS or MS is caused by the vaccine. Several
different health agencies have been watching carefully for these
illnesses following the vaccine and comparing the rates of these
illnesses to the background rates. There is no change. And, there is no
scientific reason to suspect that GBS or MS is caused by the vaccine.

Jeff

john[_5_]
January 20th 10, 01:07 PM
"dr_jeff" > wrote in message
...
> john wrote:
>> 38 CASES OF GUILLIAN BARRÉ AND 11 CASES OF MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS FOLLOWING
>> VACCINATION AGAINST H1N1
>
> And had the vaccine not been given, there would have been 38 cases of GBS
> and 11 cases of MS in the same people.
>
> There is no evidence that GBS or MS is caused by the vaccine. Several
> different health agencies have been watching carefully for these illnesses
> following the vaccine and comparing the rates of these illnesses to the
> background rates. There is no change. And, there is no scientific reason
> to suspect that GBS or MS is caused by the vaccine.
>
> Jeff

********, as usual http://www.whale.to/vaccines/gbs.htm
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/ms.htm

Some of us can recall the 600 cases of GBS from the 1976 swine flu scam
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/swine.html

Peter Parry
January 20th 10, 04:01 PM
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:07:40 -0000, "john" > wrote:

>Some of us can recall the 600 cases of GBS from the 1976 swine flu scam

However, do you remember the 600 cases from the 1977 non swine flu non
scam? Or the same from 1978, 1979 and so on?

You are getting as bad as that unhinged Kiwi "Risk Analyst" who was
including people killed in road accidents when passengers in cars as
"vaccine deaths".

john[_5_]
January 20th 10, 08:54 PM
"Peter Parry" > wrote in message
...
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:07:40 -0000, "john" > wrote:
>
>>Some of us can recall the 600 cases of GBS from the 1976 swine flu scam
>
> However, do you remember the 600 cases from the 1977 non swine flu non
> scam? Or the same from 1978, 1979 and so on?
>

No, just the 600 from the 1976 scam, a pretty notorius example

[2009 may] The case of Sam Goldstein and the swine flu vaccine Within a
month Sam Goldstein was dead. He was hospitalized shortly after the first
tingling, then paralysis spread throughout his body. He died of pneumonia, a
complication of Guillain-Barre, on Jan. 15, 1977. Between 24 and 32 people
died of illnesses related to the vaccine, and an estimated 500 people
developed Guillain-Barre syndrome. The feared pandemic of swine flu never
materialized. http://www.whale.to/vaccine/case1.html

sound familiar?

Peter Parry
January 20th 10, 10:01 PM
On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:54:35 -0000, "john" > wrote:

>No, just the 600 from the 1976 scam, a pretty notorius example

So why were these 600 different from the 600 before and the 600 after?

Mike[_7_]
January 21st 10, 05:43 AM
Peter Parry wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:54:35 -0000, "john" > wrote:
>
>> No, just the 600 from the 1976 scam, a pretty notorius example
>
> So why were these 600 different from the 600 before and the 600 after?

Where did you get the number 600 for 1977 and after?

The issue is that the incidence of GBS was significantly higher
among those who got a swine flu jab in 1976.
So much higher that it could be admitted in court as evidence.
There were numerous vaccine injury claims, some were accepted,
about $13M has been paid.

Peter B[_2_]
January 21st 10, 06:45 AM
"Mike" > wrote in message
...
> Peter Parry wrote:
>> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:54:35 -0000, "john" > wrote:
>>
>>> No, just the 600 from the 1976 scam, a pretty notorius example
>>
>> So why were these 600 different from the 600 before and the 600
>> after?
>
> Where did you get the number 600 for 1977 and after?
>
> The issue is that the incidence of GBS was significantly higher
> among those who got a swine flu jab in 1976.
> So much higher that it could be admitted in court as evidence.
> There were numerous vaccine injury claims, some were accepted,
> about $13M has been paid.

Provide independent proof please or should it just be considered
hearsay?

Mike[_7_]
January 22nd 10, 05:37 AM
Peter B wrote:
> "Mike" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Peter Parry wrote:
>>> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:54:35 -0000, "john" > wrote:
>>>
>>>> No, just the 600 from the 1976 scam, a pretty notorius example
>>> So why were these 600 different from the 600 before and the 600
>>> after?
>> Where did you get the number 600 for 1977 and after?
>>
>> The issue is that the incidence of GBS was significantly higher
>> among those who got a swine flu jab in 1976.
>> So much higher that it could be admitted in court as evidence.
>> There were numerous vaccine injury claims, some were accepted,
>> about $13M has been paid.
>
> Provide independent proof please or should it just be considered
> hearsay?
>
>
http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/ops/hsc-scen-3_pandemic-1976.htm

Peter B[_2_]
January 22nd 10, 07:02 AM
"Mike" > wrote in message
...
> Peter B wrote:
>> "Mike" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Peter Parry wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:54:35 -0000, "john" > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> No, just the 600 from the 1976 scam, a pretty notorius example
>>>> So why were these 600 different from the 600 before and the 600
>>>> after?
>>> Where did you get the number 600 for 1977 and after?
>>>
>>> The issue is that the incidence of GBS was significantly higher
>>> among those who got a swine flu jab in 1976.
>>> So much higher that it could be admitted in court as evidence.
>>> There were numerous vaccine injury claims, some were accepted,
>>> about $13M has been paid.
>>
>> Provide independent proof please or should it just be considered
>> hearsay?
> http://www.globalsecurity.org/security/ops/hsc-scen-3_pandemic-1976.htm

That link is not related to your comments, it was not proof. All it does
is show your statements were totally unfounded.