When did WHO change the definition of pandemic?

[john[_5_]]

http://beyondconformity.co.nz/_blog/Hilary's_Desk/post/More_WHO_swine_flu_porkies

On 10th January 2010, the WHO put out a press release stating that they had
not changed the definition of epidemic mid-way through the Swine flu, in
order to ramp up sales of an unnecessary vaccine for a virus which did not
fit their previous definition of the word "pandemic". Their porky comes
after a European governing body announced a formal investigation of WHO for
consistently scaremongering H1N1 into something dangerous, when it is not
even as bad as normal flu, and...according to them... doing it because WHO
experts have their hands in the "pharma tills" big time.

Yesterday, the Sunday Star Times published an article yesterday, ramping
everyone up about a "next" wave of Swine Flu, to yet again frighten the
gullible into accepting a new trivalent flu shot which has H1N1 in it.
Nothing like having a captive audience, huh? So if you "want" the ordinary
flu vaccine, the Swine flu is embedded in it as well. Have their been any
studies looking at the safety of this particular combination? After all,
Switzerland has put out a warning that Novartis's H1N1 vaccine could be
dangerous for the autoimmune. Have any studies been done in that regard on
the New Zealand vaccine? No? I thought not.

I thought readers here might like to know that anything the WHO did change
the definition of "pandemic" in the middle of the Swine Flu outbreak, to
suit themselves, and good old Google cache provided the proof. (Psst... Is
the head of WHO internet literate?)

TThese two documents were sourced and provided by Dr Tom Jefferson, and Dr
Peter Doshi.

This is the WHO website on 1 May 2009 (Google cache pdf).
This is the WHO website on Sept 2, 2009 (Google cache pdf).

So, the question that needs to be asked is:

If the WHO is lying about changing the definition of the word "pandemic" in
order to ramp up fear, so that Big Pharma farms even bigger profits, and WHO
does too, what else are they lying about?

Stay Tuned.
Last edited by Momtezuma Tuatara; Yesterday at 03:28 PM.

[Peter B[_2_]]

"john" > wrote in message
...
> http://beyondconformity.
>
>
> If the WHO is lying about changing the definition of the word
> "pandemic" in order to ramp up fear, so that Big Pharma farms even
> bigger profits, and WHO does too, what else are they lying about?
>

How about delineating your thoughts and others thoughts or writing? K?

How about rethinking your whole idea or premise? Why stick on the
definition of "the word", which they did not do, and look at what they
used as qualifiers for it?

Try a bit of honesty, please.

[Jason[_2_]]

In article >, "john"
> wrote:

>
http://beyondconformity.co.nz/_blog/Hilary's_Desk/post/More_WHO_swine_flu_porkies
>
> On 10th January 2010, the WHO put out a press release stating that they had
> not changed the definition of epidemic mid-way through the Swine flu, in
> order to ramp up sales of an unnecessary vaccine for a virus which did not
> fit their previous definition of the word "pandemic". Their porky comes
> after a European governing body announced a formal investigation of WHO for
> consistently scaremongering H1N1 into something dangerous, when it is not
> even as bad as normal flu, and...according to them... doing it because WHO
> experts have their hands in the "pharma tills" big time.
>
> Yesterday, the Sunday Star Times published an article yesterday, ramping
> everyone up about a "next" wave of Swine Flu, to yet again frighten the
> gullible into accepting a new trivalent flu shot which has H1N1 in it.
> Nothing like having a captive audience, huh? So if you "want" the ordinary
> flu vaccine, the Swine flu is embedded in it as well. Have their been any
> studies looking at the safety of this particular combination? After all,
> Switzerland has put out a warning that Novartis's H1N1 vaccine could be
> dangerous for the autoimmune. Have any studies been done in that regard on
> the New Zealand vaccine? No? I thought not.
>
> I thought readers here might like to know that anything the WHO did change
> the definition of "pandemic" in the middle of the Swine Flu outbreak, to
> suit themselves, and good old Google cache provided the proof. (Psst... Is
> the head of WHO internet literate?)
>
> TThese two documents were sourced and provided by Dr Tom Jefferson, and Dr
> Peter Doshi.
>
> This is the WHO website on 1 May 2009 (Google cache pdf).
> This is the WHO website on Sept 2, 2009 (Google cache pdf).
>
> So, the question that needs to be asked is:
>
> If the WHO is lying about changing the definition of the word "pandemic" in
> order to ramp up fear, so that Big Pharma farms even bigger profits, and WHO
> does too, what else are they lying about?
>
> Stay Tuned.
> Last edited by Momtezuma Tuatara; Yesterday at 03:28 PM.

I believe that WHO and other organizations believed that Swine Flu was
going to cause a REAL pandemic. They were wrong so those organizations are
trying their best to call swine flu a pandemic even if it is NOT a true
pandemic because they do not want have to tell everyone that they were
wrong.
Jason

[john[_5_]]

"Jason" > wrote in message
...

>
> I believe that WHO and other organizations believed that Swine Flu was
> going to cause a REAL pandemic. They were wrong so those organizations are
> trying their best to call swine flu a pandemic even if it is NOT a true
> pandemic because they do not want have to tell everyone that they were
> wrong.
> Jason
>
>

10/10 for naivity http://www.whale.to/vaccines/who.html

[Peter B[_2_]]

"john" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Jason" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>
>> I believe that WHO and other organizations believed that Swine Flu
>> was
>> going to cause a REAL pandemic. They were wrong so those
>> organizations are
>> trying their best to call swine flu a pandemic even if it is NOT a
>> true
>> pandemic because they do not want have to tell everyone that they
>> were
>> wrong.
>> Jason
>>
>>
>
> 10/10 for naivity http://www.whale.to/vaccines/who.html

I wouldn't say that site has naivety, especially at the 10 out of 10
level.

Bias, yes.
Negativity, yes.
Ill founded ideas and concepts, yes.
Agenda over rides truth, yes
But Naivety? never.

[Mike[_7_]]

Jason wrote:
> In article >, "john"
> > wrote:
>
> http://beyondconformity.co.nz/_blog/Hilary's_Desk/post/More_WHO_swine_flu_porkies
>> On 10th January 2010, the WHO put out a press release stating that they had
>> not changed the definition of epidemic mid-way through the Swine flu, in
>> order to ramp up sales of an unnecessary vaccine for a virus which did not
>> fit their previous definition of the word "pandemic". Their porky comes
>> after a European governing body announced a formal investigation of WHO for
>> consistently scaremongering H1N1 into something dangerous, when it is not
>> even as bad as normal flu, and...according to them... doing it because WHO
>> experts have their hands in the "pharma tills" big time.
>>
>> Yesterday, the Sunday Star Times published an article yesterday, ramping
>> everyone up about a "next" wave of Swine Flu, to yet again frighten the
>> gullible into accepting a new trivalent flu shot which has H1N1 in it.
>> Nothing like having a captive audience, huh? So if you "want" the ordinary
>> flu vaccine, the Swine flu is embedded in it as well. Have their been any
>> studies looking at the safety of this particular combination? After all,
>> Switzerland has put out a warning that Novartis's H1N1 vaccine could be
>> dangerous for the autoimmune. Have any studies been done in that regard on
>> the New Zealand vaccine? No? I thought not.
>>
>> I thought readers here might like to know that anything the WHO did change
>> the definition of "pandemic" in the middle of the Swine Flu outbreak, to
>> suit themselves, and good old Google cache provided the proof. (Psst... Is
>> the head of WHO internet literate?)
>>
>> TThese two documents were sourced and provided by Dr Tom Jefferson, and Dr
>> Peter Doshi.
>>
>> This is the WHO website on 1 May 2009 (Google cache pdf).
>> This is the WHO website on Sept 2, 2009 (Google cache pdf).
>>
>> So, the question that needs to be asked is:
>>
>> If the WHO is lying about changing the definition of the word "pandemic" in
>> order to ramp up fear, so that Big Pharma farms even bigger profits, and WHO
>> does too, what else are they lying about?
>>
>> Stay Tuned.
>> Last edited by Momtezuma Tuatara; Yesterday at 03:28 PM.
>
> I believe that WHO and other organizations believed that Swine Flu was
> going to cause a REAL pandemic. They were wrong so those organizations are
> trying their best to call swine flu a pandemic even if it is NOT a true
> pandemic because they do not want have to tell everyone that they were
> wrong.
> Jason
>
>
No. They decided to change the meaning of the word pandemic.

If they thought there will be real pandemic - that is, with "enormous
numbers of death and illness" as defined at the time they would not need
to change the definition.

But they did not believe it would be real, or at the very least did not
have an opinion. So they opted for a semantic trick. And did it in
advance.