PDA

View Full Version : the good enema and the war between good and evil


Lifeknox
July 15th 03, 03:43 PM
The good enema is part of the war. Right now we are in a great war between good
and evil. There are forces which fight to promote and sustain ways of life
based on greed and use of the resources of the world for only profit. There are
forces which fight to promote the sustainable life and good of the planet and
all its lifeforms.

The enema has been replaced by drugs, pills, things like pitocin used to
strengthen contractions and speed the delivery of babies at the discretion of
the doctor rather than nature. The enema is safe and gentle, a loving caring
treatment that, if used properly could prevent the deaths of at least thousands
of moms and their babies world wide each year instead of pitocin.

The enema is a safe, gentle, motherly treatment that if used properly might
prevent a great many more deaths from SARS and other respiratory illnesses
world wide rather than drugs which are proving less and less effective against
bacterial lung infections and do not work against viruses.

The enema when used properly to prevent the development of a pattern of
obstipation in children, could prevent how many millions of people from
suffering a pattern of constipation that ultimately results in a lower quality
shorter life?

We are in a war between good and evil. It has always been so. Now it is a
greater war than ever. I have for years been in this war, I have written and
published many volumes that are here to help the "good" side in this war, the
side that is not based on greed, but love.

We all can by making simple changes in our lives, including using
scientifically proven and safe enemas rather than drugs or more artificial
means of health care that in the long run have no real benefit!

Certainly this war is on going and ever present. It is just that now it is in a
critical and much larger phase than ever before. There are many fronts. The use
of good enemas is only one small one. We know that the vegan lifestyle in which
each vegan used 1/32 of the resources of a meat eater that this is a much
bigger part of the war. There are millions of fronts and each of us can help by
living correctly and doing good things. We must also support each other and
make sure that good influences are not sequestered and kept from working to
help the world at this time.

thanks

Dr Jerry G Knox BA, DC
http://www.lifeknox.com

Jeff Utz
July 16th 03, 12:00 AM
Enemas are dangerous. They can cause electrolyte imbalances and rupture the
interstines. There is no evidence that they work for the things this quack
suggests they do.

If I am incorrect, please show that peer-reviewed studies that show that
enemas and safe and effective for regular use, when not directed by a real
medical doctor.

http://www.quackwatch.org/01QuackeryRelatedTopics/gastro.html

All the best,

Jeff

Lifeknox
July 16th 03, 03:18 AM
Try the 1979 article in the New England Journal of Medicine on Colonic
Irrigation. In that all the scientific medical journal articles from 1923 to
1979 were reviewed. In those it was found that 16 people all total had been
killed by improperly given enemas. NO ONE WAS EVER HARMED BY A PROPERLY GIVEN
ENEMA!!! In the same time hundreds of patients were killed by reactions to a
single dose of aspirin!! Thus proving for all time that enemas are one of the
safest treatments every devised by human kind. In that period of time there is
no way of estimating how many billions of enemas were given but it would have
been a huge number with no fatalities or even minor injuries!!!

As to properly given enemas, yes they do require an average IQ to do properly.
I have a 54 page article on line for those that want to know the best way to do
them. It is free to download for personal use, http://www.lifeknox.com just go
to the article on how to give an enema.

And if you had read on you would know that this is only one minor part of the
article. If we do not face and address our own contributions to the declining
quality of life on earth and make real changes to help with those problems,
rather than just charging off with guns blazing in all directions we will be
destroying the future of all our children!!!! It is time to look objectively at
enemas, diet, lifestyle and our use of energy etc.,

thank you

Jerry
(Dr Jerry G Knox BA, DC)

Lifeknox
July 16th 03, 03:21 AM
I just noticed your link to quack watch-- I think that tells it all!!!! Has
quack watch had any success attracting any one with a true scientific interest
in health, or are you all still just a bunch of folks that spend all your time
trying to attack everything alternative in the world by any means possible?

thanks

Jerry

Lifeknox
July 16th 03, 05:13 PM
kindly show a real scientific article to back up any of your statements! As we
all know the articles you list appear to be scientific but usually only quote
each other in a circle of bigotry and ignorance which misleads uneducated
gullible people. Of course I expect you to put up a canned list of articles
which support your view without any scientific basis at all!!!

Enemas have been use for at least thousands of years successfully to treat many
conditions. This practice was only stopped to make more $$$ for the medical
industry, without one hours scientific research as you know. Fracture setting
also does not have the documentation you demand, however medicine keeps doing
it because it is necessary and does make $$. Enemas are just as valuable as
anyone with a grain of common sense knows!

Try learning about science and doing a little less money grubbing on line, and
perhaps the world will be betteroff.

sincerely
Dr Jerry G Knox BA, DC

Jeff Utz
July 16th 03, 10:27 PM
I am afraid that you are the one making the claim that enemas are good. You
need to back it up.

All the best,

Jeff

Lifeknox
July 17th 03, 10:56 PM
I have a question. Peer reviewed journals! For one thing I may be wrong, but
has any member of Quack watch ever gotten an article published in a truly
scientific peer reviewed journal. I know they may be placed in political
journals which are not scientific and referenced from there, but has any member
of quack watch ever published a truly scientific article--- anywhere!! Or is
all they do just attack others who have more knowledge than they do and claim
to know more than everyone else based on having bought a medical degree?

thanks

Jerry

John Clark
July 18th 03, 01:59 AM
(Lifeknox) wrote in message >...
> I have a question. Peer reviewed journals! For one thing I may be wrong, but
> has any member of Quack watch ever gotten an article published in a truly
> scientific peer reviewed journal. I know they may be placed in political
> journals which are not scientific and referenced from there, but has any member
> of quack watch ever published a truly scientific article--- anywhere!! Or is
> all they do just attack others who have more knowledge than they do and claim
> to know more than everyone else based on having bought a medical degree?


Dr. Baratz has. He is the head of NCAHF.

Lifeknox
July 18th 03, 05:47 PM
please spell out the letters of the NACHF. It this a reputable organization, or
just one that makes unfounded, unscientific claims against anyone who treats
using anything else other than drugs, surgery or radiation?

thanks

Dr Jerry G Knox BA, DC
chiropractic physician
http://www.lifeknox.com

Mark Probert
July 18th 03, 06:26 PM
Lifeknox wrote:
> please spell out the letters of the NACHF. It this a reputable organization, or
> just one that makes unfounded, unscientific claims against anyone who treats
> using anything else other than drugs, surgery or radiation?
>
> thanks
>
> Dr Jerry G Knox BA, DC
> chiropractic physician
> http://www.lifeknox.com


http://www.ncahf.com/

Jeff Utz
July 19th 03, 12:52 AM
Perhaps you should ask the good people of QuackWatch.

Jeff

"Lifeknox" > wrote in message
...
> I have a question. Peer reviewed journals! For one thing I may be wrong,
but
> has any member of Quack watch ever gotten an article published in a truly
> scientific peer reviewed journal. I know they may be placed in political
> journals which are not scientific and referenced from there, but has any
member
> of quack watch ever published a truly scientific article--- anywhere!! Or
is
> all they do just attack others who have more knowledge than they do and
claim
> to know more than everyone else based on having bought a medical degree?
>
> thanks
>
> Jerry
>
>

Jeff Utz
July 31st 03, 12:25 AM
"Lifeknox" > wrote in message
...
> quackwatch!!!! In my opinion, having read enough of the articles against
> everything except highly profitable medical treatments touted by that
group

What medical treatment is "touted?" I did not see any medical treatment
touted.

> is
> enough, to make me believe that EVERYTHING they publish is unscientific
and
> unfounded!! I would consider their opinions about any alternative
treatment as
> valuable as ariticles on Jews written by leaders of the Klan! Some of the
> Klan's articles have references, are printed on good machines and seem
fair
> enough on the surface, but on closer inspections, just as the articles
written
> by groups such as quack watch tend to just reference in a circle other
articles
> not published in reputable journals that are written by others without an
> objective basis for thier "opinions" not scientific facts. These are my
> opinions, I think they are shared by most health professionals that have
> investigated the anti-health alternative opinions of these people!

Cool. Show us just some of the stuff that they say that is not supported by
the peer-reviewed literature.

Jeff
>
> thanks
>
> Jerry