PDA

View Full Version : Vaccine mercury danger


Roger Schlafly
September 27th 03, 10:27 PM
Today's NY Times Magazine tells the story of how one the top USA vaccine
advocates, Neal Halsey, became a critic when he discovered that thimerosal
(a mercury compound) in vaccines could be causing an epidemic of autism:

And then suddenly in June 1999, during a visit to the Food and Drug
Administration, a squall appeared on the horizon of Halsey's confidence.
Halsey attended a meeting to discuss thimerosal, a mercury-containing
preservative that at the time was being used in several vaccines --
including the hepatitis B shot that Halsey had fought so hard to have
administered to American babies. By the time the dust kicked up in that
meeting had settled, Halsey would be forced to reckon with the hypothesis
that thimerosal had damaged the brains of immunized infants and may have
contributed to the unexplained explosion in the number of cases of autism
being diagnosed in children.

Making matters worse, the latest science on mercury damage suggested
that even small amounts of organic mercury could do harm to the fetal brain.
Some of the federal safety guidelines on mercury were relaxed in the 90's,
even as the amount of mercury that children received in vaccines increased.
The more Halsey learned about these mercury studies, the more he worried.

The article explains how others in the vaccine establishment wanted to cover
up the mercury problem. Paul Offit, a vaccinologist at the Children's
Hospital of Philadelphia, said: ''In some instances I think full disclosure
can be harmful''.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/10/magazine/10AUTISM.html

Jeff
September 27th 03, 10:49 PM
Welcome to the year 2003, Roger. The article was published last October, not
today (besides, today is Saturday, the magazine is published on Sundays).

The original article (not the correction that URL below points to) made it
very clear that Halsey's concerns were hypothetical, and that there was no
direct evidence that the amount in vaccines have been shown to harm anyone.
Personally, I think Halsey's call was the correct one, he did the right
thing. However, I will emphasize that no one has shown that the ethylmercury
(which is different than the methylmercury found in fish) has been shown to
hurt anyone in the doses that are found in vaccines.

In addition, correction (URL below) makes it very clear that Halsey did not
think that thimerosal causes autism.

All the best,

Jeff.

"Roger Schlafly" > wrote in message
ink.net...
> Today's NY Times Magazine tells the story of how one the top USA vaccine
> advocates, Neal Halsey, became a critic when he discovered that thimerosal
> (a mercury compound) in vaccines could be causing an epidemic of autism:
>
> And then suddenly in June 1999, during a visit to the Food and Drug
> Administration, a squall appeared on the horizon of Halsey's confidence.
> Halsey attended a meeting to discuss thimerosal, a mercury-containing
> preservative that at the time was being used in several vaccines --
> including the hepatitis B shot that Halsey had fought so hard to have
> administered to American babies. By the time the dust kicked up in that
> meeting had settled, Halsey would be forced to reckon with the hypothesis
> that thimerosal had damaged the brains of immunized infants and may have
> contributed to the unexplained explosion in the number of cases of autism
> being diagnosed in children.
>
> Making matters worse, the latest science on mercury damage suggested
> that even small amounts of organic mercury could do harm to the fetal
brain.
> Some of the federal safety guidelines on mercury were relaxed in the 90's,
> even as the amount of mercury that children received in vaccines
increased.
> The more Halsey learned about these mercury studies, the more he worried.
>
> The article explains how others in the vaccine establishment wanted to
cover
> up the mercury problem. Paul Offit, a vaccinologist at the Children's
> Hospital of Philadelphia, said: ''In some instances I think full
disclosure
> can be harmful''.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2002/11/10/magazine/10AUTISM.html
>
>

Roger Schlafly
September 28th 03, 01:15 AM
"Jeff" > wrote
> Welcome to the year 2003, Roger. The article was published last October,
not
> today (besides, today is Saturday, the magazine is published on Sundays).

I don't know why that happened. I guess I wrote it a long time ago.
I don't know why it is just appearing now.

Yes, today is Saturday but the NY Times has already posted its
Sunday magazine for tomorrow.

Jeff
September 28th 03, 09:07 PM
"Roger Schlafly" > wrote in message
t...
> "Jeff" > wrote
> > Welcome to the year 2003, Roger. The article was published last October,
> not
> > today (besides, today is Saturday, the magazine is published on
Sundays).
>
> I don't know why that happened. I guess I wrote it a long time ago.
> I don't know why it is just appearing now.
>
> Yes, today is Saturday but the NY Times has already posted its
> Sunday magazine for tomorrow.
>

I understand. I have notice things getting stuck in Outlook Express too. You
might considering upgrading to Internet Explorer 6.0 with the latest service
pack and all available patches (do this from WIndows Update in the Tools
menu of Internet Explorer). I don't know if it will help this problem, but
having the latest patches is a good idea to help prevent virus problems and
other types of attacks against yoru computer.

Jeff