Oh, yeah another rant...
But are you an official member of the He-Man Woman Hater Club? Come on,
show us your card. : ) Zimm frankjones wrote: I declare myself, not Bob, to be the Alpha male on this board, and many of my fraternity brothers agree. So does my dog and my two cats. |
Oh, yeah another rant...
But are you an official member of the He-Man Woman Hater Club? Come on,
show us your card. : ) Zimm frankjones wrote: I declare myself, not Bob, to be the Alpha male on this board, and many of my fraternity brothers agree. So does my dog and my two cats. |
Oh, yeah another rant...
But are you an official member of the He-Man Woman Hater Club? Come on,
show us your card. : ) Zimm frankjones wrote: I declare myself, not Bob, to be the Alpha male on this board, and many of my fraternity brothers agree. So does my dog and my two cats. |
"Child support stuck in system"
Child support stuck in system
Special Report: In the often-contentious world of child support, it's not uncommon for one parent to tell the other that the child-support check is "in the mail." Sometimes, it's just an excuse to put off a nagging ex-spouse. at http://www.washtimes.com/specialrepo...0901-6910r.htm |
"Child support stuck in system"
Of course the states will never cough up the interest accumulated from
holding the money either. "Mike" wrote in message om... Child support stuck in system Special Report: In the often-contentious world of child support, it's not uncommon for one parent to tell the other that the child-support check is "in the mail." Sometimes, it's just an excuse to put off a nagging ex-spouse. at http://www.washtimes.com/specialrepo...0901-6910r.htm |
"Child support stuck in system"
Of course the states will never cough up the interest accumulated from
holding the money either. "Mike" wrote in message om... Child support stuck in system Special Report: In the often-contentious world of child support, it's not uncommon for one parent to tell the other that the child-support check is "in the mail." Sometimes, it's just an excuse to put off a nagging ex-spouse. at http://www.washtimes.com/specialrepo...0901-6910r.htm |
"Child support stuck in system"
Of course the states will never cough up the interest accumulated from
holding the money either. "Mike" wrote in message om... Child support stuck in system Special Report: In the often-contentious world of child support, it's not uncommon for one parent to tell the other that the child-support check is "in the mail." Sometimes, it's just an excuse to put off a nagging ex-spouse. at http://www.washtimes.com/specialrepo...0901-6910r.htm |
"Child support stuck in system"
"Mike" wrote in message om... Child support stuck in system Special Report: In the often-contentious world of child support, it's not uncommon for one parent to tell the other that the child-support check is "in the mail." Sometimes, it's just an excuse to put off a nagging ex-spouse. at http://www.washtimes.com/specialrepo...0901-6910r.htm Just another example why this has nothing to do with supporting children and more to do with the state making a profit off of interest payments. If you are going to be required to pay it should be direct without state involvment. |
"Child support stuck in system"
"Mike" wrote in message om... Child support stuck in system Special Report: In the often-contentious world of child support, it's not uncommon for one parent to tell the other that the child-support check is "in the mail." Sometimes, it's just an excuse to put off a nagging ex-spouse. at http://www.washtimes.com/specialrepo...0901-6910r.htm Just another example why this has nothing to do with supporting children and more to do with the state making a profit off of interest payments. If you are going to be required to pay it should be direct without state involvment. |
"Child support stuck in system"
"Mike" wrote in message om... Child support stuck in system Special Report: In the often-contentious world of child support, it's not uncommon for one parent to tell the other that the child-support check is "in the mail." Sometimes, it's just an excuse to put off a nagging ex-spouse. at http://www.washtimes.com/specialrepo...0901-6910r.htm Just another example why this has nothing to do with supporting children and more to do with the state making a profit off of interest payments. If you are going to be required to pay it should be direct without state involvment. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ParentingBanter.com