Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.
"Phil" wrote in message ... "DVD" wrote in message ... Chris wrote: [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] Okay, what about a guy who is in prison running hookers and selling meth to other innmates? He can easily afford to support a child with his meth and hooker earnings, but can he really take custody of the child? Supporting a child is more than money. I think that is the problem here. You seem to equate money as the cure for all ills and the answer to all problems. Supporting children means so much more than paying money to someone who may or may not use it for the children. "Support" means kissing boo-boos, explaining homework problems, educating on morals, assuring a teen that acne is not the end of the world, teaching how to drive and why money can not buy happiness. What's interesting is that, when he tells all the things he (supposedly) does for his (supposed) children, these are the sorts of things he talks about. But when he talks about other men's children, all he can talk about is money. |
Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Phil" wrote in message ... "DVD" wrote in message ... Chris wrote: [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] Okay, what about a guy who is in prison running hookers and selling meth to other innmates? He can easily afford to support a child with his meth and hooker earnings, but can he really take custody of the child? Supporting a child is more than money. I think that is the problem here. You seem to equate money as the cure for all ills and the answer to all problems. Supporting children means so much more than paying money to someone who may or may not use it for the children. "Support" means kissing boo-boos, explaining homework problems, educating on morals, assuring a teen that acne is not the end of the world, teaching how to drive and why money can not buy happiness. What's interesting is that, when he tells all the things he (supposedly) does for his (supposed) children, these are the sorts of things he talks about. But when he talks about other men's children, all he can talk about is money. Telling idinit? Phil #3 |
Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.
-- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] .. .. "DVD" wrote in message ... Phil wrote: "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Phil" wrote in message ... "DVD" wrote in message . .. Chris wrote: [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] Okay, what about a guy who is in prison running hookers and selling meth to other innmates? He can easily afford to support a child with his meth and hooker earnings, but can he really take custody of the child? What's interesting is that, when he tells all the things he (supposedly) does for his (supposed) children, these are the sorts of things he talks about. But when he talks about other men's children, all he can talk about is money. Telling idinit? Phil #3 Bull**** actually. Looks like you can't argue against common sense. Probably because you are too busy fighting all the biases the world has against you. One guy claims that any guy who can pay support should have custody, Who might THAT be? I ask about a guy who does have money but is a meth dealer in jail, you 2 idiots try to claim "its all about money to you" when in reality that would be exactly opposite of the point I made. On top of that the point made by the original poster is all about money and my post says it isn't. Can you see now why your arguements and anecdotes shouldn't be believed by a sensible person? |
Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.
"DVD" wrote in message ... Phil wrote: "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Phil" wrote in message ... "DVD" wrote in message .. . Chris wrote: [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] Okay, what about a guy who is in prison running hookers and selling meth to other innmates? He can easily afford to support a child with his meth and hooker earnings, but can he really take custody of the child? What's interesting is that, when he tells all the things he (supposedly) does for his (supposed) children, these are the sorts of things he talks about. But when he talks about other men's children, all he can talk about is money. Telling idinit? Phil #3 Bull**** actually. Looks like you can't argue against common sense. Why don't you try trotting some out, and we'll see. |
Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.
"DVD" wrote in message ... teachrmama wrote: "Phil" wrote in message ... "DVD" wrote in message . .. Chris wrote: [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] Okay, what about a guy who is in prison running hookers and selling meth to other innmates? He can easily afford to support a child with his meth and hooker earnings, but can he really take custody of the child? Supporting a child is more than money. I think that is the problem here. You seem to equate money as the cure for all ills and the answer to all problems. Supporting children means so much more than paying money to someone who may or may not use it for the children. "Support" means kissing boo-boos, explaining homework problems, educating on morals, assuring a teen that acne is not the end of the world, teaching how to drive and why money can not buy happiness. What's interesting is that, when he tells all the things he (supposedly) does for his (supposed) children, these are the sorts of things he talks about. But when he talks about other men's children, all he can talk about is money. He lies, you join in and swear to what he says. You are the most dishonest group of people I have ever seen. Us? Really? Then I know for sure that you have never been to family court!! |
Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.
"DVD" wrote in message ... Phil wrote: "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Phil" wrote in message ... "DVD" wrote in message .. . Chris wrote: [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] Okay, what about a guy who is in prison running hookers and selling meth to other innmates? He can easily afford to support a child with his meth and hooker earnings, but can he really take custody of the child? What's interesting is that, when he tells all the things he (supposedly) does for his (supposed) children, these are the sorts of things he talks about. But when he talks about other men's children, all he can talk about is money. Telling idinit? Phil #3 Bull**** actually. Looks like you can't argue against common sense. Never tried, myself but you seem to have lots of experience. Probably because you are too busy fighting all the biases the world has against you. Not me personally. I've been out of the loop of legalized extortion (custody and C$) for some time now. One guy claims that any guy who can pay support should have custody, I ask about a guy who does have money but is a meth dealer in jail, you 2 idiots try to claim "its all about money to you" when in reality that would be exactly opposite of the point I made. You see, that is the problem. Child support IS about how much money the father can pay the mother. Not the children and not other forms of support including but not limited to spiritual, emotional and moral support. On top of that the point made by the original poster is all about money and my post says it isn't. Can you see now why your arguements and anecdotes shouldn't be believed by a sensible person? The fact that you think a divorced, non-custodial father's role is anything other than money proves that you don't have a clue about child support. Money is the only acceptable form of child support for NCPs that states acknowledge. You need to at least have an open mind and do some actual research (not accomplished solely by reading a newspaper, by the way). Those who have devoted years of their life in living as you deny AND have done years of reading unbiased articles and studies may just be more educated than someone who once read a short article in a newspaper that only reinforced their prejudice. Phil #3 |
Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.
"DVD" wrote in message ... teachrmama wrote: "Phil" wrote in message ... "DVD" wrote in message . .. Chris wrote: [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] Okay, what about a guy who is in prison running hookers and selling meth to other innmates? He can easily afford to support a child with his meth and hooker earnings, but can he really take custody of the child? Supporting a child is more than money. I think that is the problem here. You seem to equate money as the cure for all ills and the answer to all problems. Supporting children means so much more than paying money to someone who may or may not use it for the children. "Support" means kissing boo-boos, explaining homework problems, educating on morals, assuring a teen that acne is not the end of the world, teaching how to drive and why money can not buy happiness. What's interesting is that, when he tells all the things he (supposedly) does for his (supposed) children, these are the sorts of things he talks about. But when he talks about other men's children, all he can talk about is money. He lies, you join in and swear to what he says. You are the most dishonest group of people I have ever seen. You use your own prejudice as you sole proof of our "lies" and claim to have knowledge gained from one article in a newspaper that you cannot produce. Hmmmmmmm. Ya caught us, alright. Phil#3 |
Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.
"DVD" wrote in message ... Phil wrote: "DVD" wrote in message ... teachrmama wrote: "Phil" wrote in message ... "DVD" wrote in message . .. Chris wrote: [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] Okay, what about a guy who is in prison running hookers and selling meth to other innmates? He can easily afford to support a child with his meth and hooker earnings, but can he really take custody of the child? Supporting a child is more than money. I think that is the problem here. You seem to equate money as the cure for all ills and the answer to all problems. Supporting children means so much more than paying money to someone who may or may not use it for the children. "Support" means kissing boo-boos, explaining homework problems, educating on morals, assuring a teen that acne is not the end of the world, teaching how to drive and why money can not buy happiness. What's interesting is that, when he tells all the things he (supposedly) does for his (supposed) children, these are the sorts of things he talks about. But when he talks about other men's children, all he can talk about is money. He lies, you join in and swear to what he says. You are the most dishonest group of people I have ever seen. You use your own prejudice as you sole proof of our "lies" and claim to have knowledge gained from one article in a newspaper that you cannot produce. Hmmmmmmm. Ya caught us, alright. Phil#3 In this tangent I am responding to 3 specific posts, mine and your 2 dishonest interpretations of what my post said. You have ignored the truth and gone onto 2 more tangents. Think I have no basis for thinking your side of a story is not the whole story? Anything you don't care to (or are unable to) respond to is either a tangent or a strawman. snicker |
Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.
"DVD" wrote in message ... teachrmama wrote: "DVD" wrote in message ... Phil wrote: "DVD" wrote in message .. . teachrmama wrote: "Phil" wrote in message ... "DVD" wrote in message m... Chris wrote: [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] Okay, what about a guy who is in prison running hookers and selling meth to other innmates? He can easily afford to support a child with his meth and hooker earnings, but can he really take custody of the child? Supporting a child is more than money. I think that is the problem here. You seem to equate money as the cure for all ills and the answer to all problems. Supporting children means so much more than paying money to someone who may or may not use it for the children. "Support" means kissing boo-boos, explaining homework problems, educating on morals, assuring a teen that acne is not the end of the world, teaching how to drive and why money can not buy happiness. What's interesting is that, when he tells all the things he (supposedly) does for his (supposed) children, these are the sorts of things he talks about. But when he talks about other men's children, all he can talk about is money. He lies, you join in and swear to what he says. You are the most dishonest group of people I have ever seen. You use your own prejudice as you sole proof of our "lies" and claim to have knowledge gained from one article in a newspaper that you cannot produce. Hmmmmmmm. Ya caught us, alright. Phil#3 In this tangent I am responding to 3 specific posts, mine and your 2 dishonest interpretations of what my post said. You have ignored the truth and gone onto 2 more tangents. Think I have no basis for thinking your side of a story is not the whole story? Anything you don't care to (or are unable to) respond to is either a tangent or a strawman. snicker Read the first post and then try to follow the rest as if you had an honest thought in your head. 2 posts in a row were just blatantly dishonest, since then you are just swearing to each other's dishonesty. Why? because you lay out your trail of cracker crumbs, and we don't follow along properly? We are discussing the ramifications of the biased system that we, ourselves, have experienced, but you think we should pant along in your wake. You seem incapable of understanding that the system that *we have experienced for many, many years* is not the idyllic system that you see as existing. You consider us dishonest because **we don't agree with you***--and for no other reason. BTW, when are you going to post that NY TIMES cite? |
Deadbeat dad, singer & Ruben Studdard look-alike Sean Levert died of natural causes; prob. faked his death to avoid paying all that C.S.
"DVD" wrote in message ... teachrmama wrote: BTW, you never answered *this* question, DVD: Woman finds out she is pregnant. She does not tell the father, but moves out of town. A couple of years later she marries another guy, and they raise the child together. She is their only child, and they do not tell her that the man she calls Daddy is not her bio dad. Meanwhile, the bio dad has moved on with his life, and eventually marries. He and his wife have 4 children. The daughter is a smart young lady, and does well in school. She begins to apply to colleges her junior year in high school, but only applies to state colleges, knowing that her parents cannot afford Ivy League. Her parents tell her to go ahead and apply to Ivy League schools--the money will be available. Mom then sues the bio dad for child support back to the birth of the child. Should she get it? Should the other 4 children of the bio dad lose out on dance lessons, Little League, karate, and summer camp because the woman waited 17 years before telling the guy that he was a father? Just how should the courts decide the case? |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:56 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
ParentingBanter.com