"Fred" wrote in message
. net...
Tripped over it again, did you?

Hardly.

Phil wrote:

You also raise another interesting problem: what if the mother
doesn't tell him about the pregnancy, does he STILL have
responsibilities and what are they?
It's still his semen, right? I mean, just because he doesn't know
that he did something doesn't mean that he didn't do it. So yeah, he
still has a degree of moral accountability, and if the child is
alive, he definitely has legal accountability.

How so?

Because it's his semen.

So men are responsible when women lie or hide the fact. Got it. Could
you BE any more biased?


"His semen, his choice, his responsibility."

All his fault, got it


What about the moral responsibility she should have to at least
inform him of the pregnancy?

You keep trying that sleazy trick, but it's not gonna work.

You cannot bring yourself to allow women to be responsible for jack.
Every problem is some man's fault, got it.
That's typical gender-feminism at it's 'finest'.


That she has such a moral responsibility does not serve to negate any
responsibility that he has.

A responsibility you'd never place on a woman, obviously.


What I'm asking you to do is to accept the responsibilities that *you*
have, and you respond by resisting that with every fiber of your
being.

No, you just can't accept the fact that it's all lopsided, that women
have all the choices and only the responsibility they choose while men
have no choices yet exactly the responsibility the woman chooses for
them.
You're blind as well as stupid.


Disgusting.

That you are.
Phil #3