"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
...

"Phil" wrote in message
link.net...

"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
...

"Fred" wrote in message
. net...
Tripped over it again, did you?

Phil wrote:

You also raise another interesting problem: what if the mother
doesn't tell him about the pregnancy, does he STILL have
responsibilities and what are they?
It's still his semen, right? I mean, just because he doesn't
know
that
he did something doesn't mean that he didn't do it. So yeah, he
still
has a degree of moral accountability, and if the child is
alive,
he
definitely has legal accountability.

How so?

Because it's his semen.

"His semen, his choice, his responsibility."

What about the moral responsibility she should have to at least
inform him of the pregnancy?

You keep trying that sleazy trick, but it's not gonna work.

That she has such a moral responsibility does not serve to negate
any
responsibility that he has.

What I'm asking you to do is to accept the responsibilities that
*you*
have, and you respond by resisting that with every fiber of your
being.

Disgusting.

Your little feminist biology lesson is based on wishful thinking
and
not
established biological information. How hard is it to understand
eggs
are a
scarcer resource than sperm? And having a child takes a greater
investment
on the part of a woman. Because of those biological facts woman by
nature
should be more selective in mates because a bad choice has long
term
implications and is a reflection on her discretion in selecting the
right
sperm.

To say men are responsible for women's bad choices in sperm is to
transfer
the biological misjudgments made by women to men. The femwits who
can't
accept their biological destiny want to have the state step in with
remedies
to cover up their biological mistakes. The state's solution is to
use
men's
money to cover-up the lack of responsibility by women who don't
select
good
mates.


You might as well talk to a brick, Bob. This one can't see beyond
their
own hatred for men, much like a couple of other gender-feminists I
could
name.

Have you seen the TV commercial where hundreds of sperm are shown
swimming
across the screen and the announcer talks about all the available
choices
and then the sperm morph into PC mice?

Naw, I've all but given up TV. I watch a movie on satellite occasionally
but can't stand the constant ads proporting 'dad to be an idiot' or
'supermoms save the day' and the shows themselves must have been written
by NOWcows.


It reminds me of these feminist types who could have chosen better
sperm
providers just as easily as they could have chosen a better PC mouse
providers. :-)

And, in case you are wondering, I find it offensive male reproductive
biology is used in such a light-hearted way to sell a product. You
would
NEVER see a woman's egg used in such a whimsical way.

Well, I guess it's true that the typical TV audience is women and
children gauging from the content which seems to be aimed at making mom
feel good about her bad choices in life and numb children's ability to
think or reason for themselves. It seems children don't read, can't
spell and have such a limited knowledge of the world outside their own
neighborhood, at least in the US. Then some of the books they use to
teach in public schools, especially history and social studies....
GRRRRRRRRRR.
Phil #3