Ken Chaddock wrote:

All you want to do is to be able to walk away from the mess you make
when you spread your sperm hither and yon, because being responsible
is so *inconvenient*, mostly to your wallet, which is the bottom line
with you boys anyway. Y'all deny informed consent, y'all deny fairness
and equity, y'all deny the child itself. It is the ultimate selfishness.

Disgusting.

What's disgusting is a mangina like you waltzing in here with no
knowledge (didn't even know about legal abandonment or the statutes
governing your own state of residence) and less sense and started to
lecture people who've *personally* lived through some of the experiences
that *YOU* insist can't happen...now *THAT'S* disgusting...

Ken, I have concluded that it is no longer productive to attempt to have
a reasonable discussion with you and your masculinist colleagues. We
will simply have to agree to disagree.

Y'all claim that you want equality. Not so. What y'all want is to
enforce your ideas of male superiority and dominance through control of
the money. That's all there is to it. And I say that with all due
consideration of you being in Canada, where discrimination based on
whatever is only a Supreme Court of Canada decision away. And if only
the court would discriminate in your favor, I doubt you'd have any
problem with it. But, being a resourceful fellow, you have gone for the
masculinist tactic of using the irresponsible behavior of others to
justify being irresponsible in turn.

When you side with a position that prefers seeing babies die in a
dumpster rather than surrender even a scintilla of masculinist male
superiority and dominance, there's simply nothing further to discuss.
That being said, I can see no constructive purpose in continuing this
conversation.

[this time I'll get the name right ... ]

Enjoy your day, Ken. Try not to hate too much.