Holger Dansk wrote:
The point remains that you made a judgement-in-ignorance about a
language you know nothing about, labeling it "primitive".

All languages are primitive compared to today if you are talking about
thousands of years prior to today.

There is no basis to conclude that.

You also
have no clue whether they have a 'noise meaning "muhfugger"'

I'm sure they would have.

Your opinion is worthless.

lojbab
--
lojbab
Bob LeChevalier, Founder, The Logical Language Group
(Opinions are my own; I do not speak for the organization.)
Artificial language Loglan/Lojban: http://www.lojban.org