"Fred" wrote in message
. net...
Tripped over it again, did you?

Phil wrote:

You also raise another interesting problem: what if the mother
doesn't tell him about the pregnancy, does he STILL have
responsibilities and what are they?
It's still his semen, right? I mean, just because he doesn't know that
he did something doesn't mean that he didn't do it. So yeah, he still
has a degree of moral accountability, and if the child is alive, he
definitely has legal accountability.

How so?

Because it's his semen.

"His semen, his choice, his responsibility."

What about the moral responsibility she should have to at least
inform him of the pregnancy?

You keep trying that sleazy trick, but it's not gonna work.

That she has such a moral responsibility does not serve to negate any
responsibility that he has.

What I'm asking you to do is to accept the responsibilities that *you*
have, and you respond by resisting that with every fiber of your being.

Disgusting.

Your little feminist biology lesson is based on wishful thinking and not
established biological information. How hard is it to understand eggs are a
scarcer resource than sperm? And having a child takes a greater investment
on the part of a woman. Because of those biological facts woman by nature
should be more selective in mates because a bad choice has long term
implications and is a reflection on her discretion in selecting the right
sperm.

To say men are responsible for women's bad choices in sperm is to transfer
the biological misjudgments made by women to men. The femwits who can't
accept their biological destiny want to have the state step in with remedies
to cover up their biological mistakes. The state's solution is to use men's
money to cover-up the lack of responsibility by women who don't select good
mates.