View Single Post
  #158  
Old October 10th 06, 05:15 PM posted to alt.mens-rights,alt.child-support,alt.support.divorce
Andre Lieven
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 80
Default Things to think of before you get married again..

Ken Chaddock ) writes:
Fred wrote:

Ken Chaddock wrote:

Fred wrote:

Gini wrote:

"teachrmama" wrote
............................

And you, Fred, are totally *dismissing* WOMEN'S responsibilities!
I am a woman, and I find it demeaning that you keep harping on what
MEN should do, but not a hint about how WOMEN should handle their
responibilities in the same situation. Everything a woman does
after the sex act is a consequence of where that mean old man left
his semen. Nonsense! Or maybe I'm just reading you wrong--why
don't you clearly delineate what the woman's responsibilities are
after the consequence of pregnancy becomes an issue.

==
A ride to the CSE office? (Because she's *owed* it, of course.)

I guess that the matter is best explained by reference to the theme
of the game Fable: "For every choice, a consequence."

It's too bad that you seem to grasp the obvious fact that all post
conception choices are the woman's and therefore, in accordance with
the precepts of "Natural/Fundamental" Justice, all the consequences
that follow from those choices should also be hers.


I am aware of what Canada's notion of "natural justice". I know that it
allows Canada to declare age discrimination to be legal even though it
is unconstitutional; see McKinney v. University of Guelph. So if you
expect me to buy any argument based on that concept, you are swimming
upstream.

I read your entire message. What it boils down to is yet another attempt
to evade your responsibilities by ignoring the doctrine of informed
consent. Sorry, but men can't just spread their semen hither and yon and
walk away from the consequences thereof because those consequences are
... *inconvenient*. That's "inconvenient" as in financially
inconvenient, because at the end of the day it's always about the money
with y'all.


Yes, it's easier to cut the article and make some unrelated,
self-serving comments when you can't rebut the points made...sometimes I
to wish I could do that to but I guess I just have too much integrity to
do so...


Ken, between the cite cutting/evading, and the phrase " spread their
semen ", I say that " Fred " is Parg.

Andre