Gini wrote:
============================================
NOT POSTED VIA FAMILYKB. THEY ARE STEALING
CONTENT FROM USENET
============================================
Shadow36 wrote:
"arabella" u38656@uwe wrote in
[quoted text clipped - 20 lines]
set
by a person's income, there shouldn't be a problem with the amount.
==
Really? Do you think ALL parents, including never divorced and single
mothers, should be required by law to spend a percentage
of their income on their children? And do you think those parents should be
mandated by law to appear in court at least every
three years so the judge can look over their tax records to be sure they are
incompliance with the manditory
spend-a-percentage-of-your-income-on-your-kids rule and, if they are not,
they go to jail? How does that sound?

I noticed your block comment that this site is stealing from Usenet. This is
an advent group, and usenet, google, and a bunch of other groups are linked
into it. It is not stealing. You might want to make a note of that if you
didn't know.
In order for the site to be stealing content from usenet, they would have to
be unaware of and not affiliated it it.

--
Message posted via http://www.familykb.com