View Single Post
  #2  
Old February 21st 04, 11:15 PM
Todd Gastaldo
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Induction Insanity

PREGNANT WOMEN: Standard medical delivery positioins close the birth canal
up to 30%. Please don't let your OB or CNMwife close your birth canal up to
30%.

INDUCTION INSANITY... To chemically INDUCE violent uterine contractions and
allow the end of the delivery to proceed with the birth canal senselessly
closed - well that is INDUCTION INSANITY



LADIES: It's EASY to allow your birth canals to OPEN the "extra" up to 30%:
Just roll onto your side as you push your baby out - or kneel or
hands-and-knees or - virtually ANYTHING but semisitting or dorsal.

Talk to your OB or CNMwife about this today! But please note my
"alternative" delivery position WARNING in ACOG birth crime video evidence,
URL below.


INDUCTION CONTRAINDICATION:
CEPHALOPELVIC DISPROPORTION

Gail Dahl indicates that cephalopelvic disproportion is a contraindication
for induction:

"The Compendium of Pharmaceuticals and Specialties, Thirty-Fifth Edition,
Copyright 2000 details the adverse effects and risks of induced labor
including fetal distress, failure to progress, failed induction leading to
episiotomy and forceps delivery or emergency cesearean operation,
hypercontractility, and fetal heart rate abnormalties. Contraindications
include: Patients with a history of cesarean section, major uterine surgery;
patients with cephalopelvic disproportion..."
http://www.mother-care.ca/induction1.htm

Gail Dahl doesn't mention that MDs CAUSE cephalopelvic disproportion!

MDs admit ON VIDEO that they are closing birth canals!

(It's an indirect admission: MDs are shown how to allow birth canals to
open maximally when the shoulders get stuck - which means MDs are closing
birth canals in the majority of births.)

See ACOG birth crime video evidence
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2300

Why doesn't Gail mention that MDs are causing cephalopelvic disproportion?

Why doesn't Mother Care's **Connie Banack** mention this? (Connie knows
about it - she may still mention me and the biomechanics in her Pushing
Positions paper - if so, she could mention her own paper as an editor's
note/link in Gail's article.)

Induction or not - it makes NO sense to let MDs close birth canals up to
30%.

Gail writes of "the baby smashing against an incomplete pelvic floor"...

"...the baby [is] pounded out...with the head of the baby smashing against
an incomplete pelvic floor. This action can cause irreparable damage to the
baby's brain, this action also places stress on the baby's heart and
oxygenation to the brain. These ineffective and incomplete contractions
create a longer labor, tiring the mother out often causing the mother to ask
for pain relieving drugs to counteract the intense and unending artificial
contractions."

Babies are being smashed against pelvic outlets senselessly closed up to
30%!

I say again: MDs CAUSE cephalopelvic disproportion!

See Christina! What about the PELVIS?! (Autism and BAD McRoberts
maneuver...)
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2303

Induction or not - it makes NO sense to let MDs close birth canals up to
30%.

Todd

Dr. Gastaldo


PS1 My thanks to Melissa Ann for mentioning the Mother Care induction info.

"Melissa Ann" wrote in message
...
I just wanted to share this resource with those who are facing an

induction
and are not sure what the risks and alternatives are.

http://www.mother-care.ca/ind_info.htm

-Melissa Ann


PS2 Induction chemicals have their place - just like forceps and vacuums
have their place - but MDs should not push or pull on babies' spines with
birth canals senselessly closed up to 30%.

This post will be archived for global access at:
http://health.groups.yahoo.com/group...t/message/2324