TN - Child support termination bill attacked
"Chris" wrote in message
...
--
[Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have
custody of such child]
.
.
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
...
"Dusty" wrote in message ...
"Yet you want to punish a child as the result of an adulterous
situation,"
said Briley. "You put the child in the position of bearing the burden
of
a
parent's conduct."
I just don't get this argument. Isn't this politician saying CS money is
more important than factual reality and truth should be ignored when
there
are signs of immorality?
To accept this argument one has to ignore it is the mother who gets
pregnant
as the result of her sexual misconduct outside of a relationship or with
multiple partners and believe the biological father should have no
responsibility.
Responsibility exists ONLY where one has a choice. Explain such choice
regarding a father and his biological children.
A biological father who knows another man is paying CS for the child he
fathered has the choice to come forward, acknolwedge his paternity, and take
over the CS payments. Currently, the CS laws allow the bio-dad to remain
anonymous and dodge any personal responsibility for his role in creating a
child. I find that to be absurd.
You really have to use pretzel logic to advocate for the status quo when
it
comes to obvious inequities in CS law.
|