"Chris" wrote in message
...


--
[Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have
custody of such child]

.
.
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
...

"Phil" wrote in message
...

"Rudy" wrote in message
. ..
Your economic stimulus payment WILL be intercepted for back child
support!

Thank GOD the Federal Government can do what the deadbeats refuse to
do.
Support their kids.



First, most "deadbeats" don't "refuse", they simply CAN'T pay the
exorbitant C$ amounts;
Second, paying the mother is NOT supporting a child.

The first thing to realize is that "child support" does not have the
same
meaning as "supporting a child".

Child support is money paid from one parent to the other under the
pretense that it will be used for the betterment of the child in
question.

I always like to add the CP's pro-rata share of the total CS obligation
is
part of the calculation even though the money does not change hands and
there is no tracking of whether it is paid or not.

So the question becomes - If the CP is not providing their share of the
total CS obligation, should their economic stimulus package be seized
too?
Why should the CP get both parent's refund?

Better question: Since the deadbeat CP parent most likely doesn't pay
income
tax in the first place, why should she get ANY tax refund; let alone TWO
of
them?

Because our government is becoming more Socialistic and redistribution of
wealth to accomplish Socialistic goals is becoming the norm. Transferring
money from high end wage earners to low end wage earners through tax policy
is conveniently augmented by high end CS payers transferring money to lower
earning CS receivers. Redistribution of wealth is just another Marxist
ideal in current society.