--
[Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have
custody of such child]

..
..
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
...

"Chris" wrote in message
...


--
[Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have
custody of such child]

.
.
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
...

"Chris" wrote in message
...


--
[Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have
custody of such child]

.
.
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
...

"Chris" wrote in message
...


--
[Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to
have
custody of such child]

.
.
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message
...

"Dusty" wrote in message
...

"Yet you want to punish a child as the result of an adulterous
situation,"
said Briley. "You put the child in the position of bearing the
burden
of
a
parent's conduct."

I just don't get this argument. Isn't this politician saying CS
money
is
more important than factual reality and truth should be ignored
when
there
are signs of immorality?

To accept this argument one has to ignore it is the mother who
gets
pregnant
as the result of her sexual misconduct outside of a relationship
or
with
multiple partners and believe the biological father should have
no
responsibility.

Responsibility exists ONLY where one has a choice. Explain such
choice
regarding a father and his biological children.

A biological father who knows another man is paying CS for the child
he
fathered has the choice to come forward, acknolwedge his paternity,
and
take
over the CS payments. Currently, the CS laws allow the bio-dad to
remain
anonymous and dodge any personal responsibility for his role in
creating
a
child. I find that to be absurd.

And just what, exactly, is his "role"?

The same role your bio-dad played in creating you. Ask your mother if
you
need more details.

Right after I posted my reply, I realized that you would probably not
understand my question. To clarify, in YOUR mind, what exactly is his
"role"?

The same role your bio-dad played in creating you.

Petitio principii. Care to try again?