"RogerN" wrote

"Gini" wrote
===
The courts have taken the position that it is in the "best interest of
the child" to keep the money flowing to the mother. Besides, if the money
is stopped, it reduces federal funds to the state.


In that case, why not let the judge pay the CS if he makes more money than
the victim? It's just as much the judge's child as it is anyone else's
except the actual biological father.
===
Except, unlike the judge, the child *thinks* the payor is his/her dad
because the payor *acted* like the dad--so the "dad" owes it to the child.
This is extrapolated from such basics as "The child calls you 'dad,'
therefore you owe the child." Yep, that'll do it.