On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 20:09:58 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
wrote:

Holger Dansk wrote:
On Fri, 04 Jun 2004 15:08:51 -0400, Bob LeChevalier
wrote:
Holger Dansk wrote:
There were some Nubians scattered around, and a lot of different tribes,
but the pharaohs were Copts.

You mission, should you decide to accept it, is to prove that the
pharaohs were "white".

Why are you so interested in skin color?

I'm not. But this discussion started with a claim about what was done
by "whites and Asians".

Blacks did nothing in the jungle for so many, many, many years, just as
they do nothing today in Africa and America.

They have good rhythm and make some good music.

The Copts were not Negroes.

Your evidence?

I'm not going to spend a lot of time searching things like that. I can
understand how a black person, like you, desperately wants to find
something in the past that blacks did that seemed to be productive. Use
Google and I'm sure you can find lots of instances where some people
were referred to as dark skinned, and you can say that they were black.

All of the black savages back then were below the Sahara desert.

Your evidence?

Use Google and you will find that the savages stayed in the jungle.
Some were probably sold, by their own people, to people north of the
Sahara, but they probably never sold them by going up there to do it,
but sold them to people who came down from the north.

lojbab

Holger

http://www.mindspring.com/~holger1/holger1.htm