wrote in
:

On Dec 18, 12:53 am, "teachrmama" wrote:
wrote in message

news:19d1a531-03a6-4fc8-b438-

...





On Dec 12, 10:33 pm, "teachrmama" wrote:
wrote in message

news:632831e8-3d8e-4d3d-98cb-

om...

On Dec 11, 11:43 pm, "teachrmama" wrote:
wrote in message

snip

No it's not. You are wrong. A woman can go for years and not
tell the
man
that he is the father of her child. Custody automatically
rests with the
mother until it is challenged by a man calining to be the
father. Custody
does not need to be established by a court if there is only a
mother, does
it?

Which would lead to her being in possession of the child,

Ah, yes, children as possessions--just like dogs, cats, and toilet
seats. Sweet.

That's just how the Cp's and CS man-ghouls treat thier children,
and I see no reason to sugar-coat it. If you want to be kissing
Sarahs ass, and tell her she is doing the right thing, well then
you need to extent that to ALL cp's, and CS recipients. What is
good for one is good for the other.

Nonsense.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

Nonsense/discrimination????!! So you ARE saying that only some single
mothers deserve child support, meaning that only some children deserve
to be supported by two/both parents. I knew something was wrong with
you.

Please explain why some women should get child support while others
shouldn't-mind now that *all* children are deserving to be supported
by both parents.


What she is saying is that men should have a way of deciding they don't
want to be parents early on, *just like women already do*. Parents who
take on the responsibilities of parenting their child can't just decide
they don't want to anymore, male or female.