Greegor wrote:
Golly, I WONDER why Doan's question was less pressing?

The one where he pointed out that LaVonne was spanked
and asked her what she learned?

Are you a violent, out of control person, LaVonne?

Did you need years of expensive THERAPY
to understand why you were spanked?

Or were you so unable to process the reasons
why you were spanked that this is why you
turned OPPOSITIONAL and defiant in your view
of the spankings you received?

I seem to recall that there is small percentage of kids
who never quite "get" why they actually deserved
a spanking for their actions. These few kids are
of particular interest because of the suspicion that
they are the few who have some sort of cognitive
problems and may well become SOCIOPATHS.

In other words, the small percentage of kids who
fail to recognize the rationale for their spankings
have some serious, possibly even dangerous
pathologies which may worsen.

Certainly, if a kid develops such contempt for
their parent when it comes to punishment, it
does not bode well for their adult lives and
the punishments from police and courts.

I find it odd that Kane claims much expertise in
psychology yet hasn't mentioned this.

Perhaps because it is inconvenient to his "cause"?