View Single Post
  #4  
Old August 14th 04, 11:45 PM
Hugh Young
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 13 Aug 2004 20:24:46 -0700, (Lyle Benson)
said:

I'm a teen-ager and since the moment I found out what happened to me I
felt angry about it. Once I found what goes on during the procedure
and what is lost, I felt sick.

I know I was robbed of something special, and I'll never know what sex
is really supposed to feel like.


Consider foreskin restoration. It won't give you back everything, but
it will give back something, and it is healing to take back some
control of that aspect of your life.

Why the hell do parents keep letting their baby boys get cut even if
they know there are no real health benefits? Why? Does it matter to
them whether or not their son *wants* to be that way? Does the risk of
death, infections and disfigurement matter? Isn't the fact that there
are tons of men ****ed off about it and stuck that way for the rest of
their lives reason enough not to do it?

I'm really curios as to why. Could any parent who has or is going to
have their little boy cut clue me in?


But the reasons they give are only the excuses. Otherwise, why do the
reasons given keep changing? Notice that the chief "medical" reason is
always the most fearful disease du jour.