If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Disagreement about third child
My wife and I have an 8-year-old son, and a 5-year-old daughter. My wife would like a third. There are times when my wife accepts not having a third, but she'll frequently find herself wanting another. She is worried she'll regret not having another one, and the ones we have are growing some quickly.
As much as I try, I can not come to terms with having a third. I try, but for a variety of reasons, I don't want another one, but I worry about my wife. Does anyone have any suggestions? Thank you and take care. ST |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Scott wrote:
My wife and I have an 8-year-old son, and a 5-year-old daughter. My wife would like a third. There are times when my wife accepts not having a third, but she'll frequently find herself wanting another. She is worried she'll regret not having another one, and the ones we have are growing some quickly. As much as I try, I can not come to terms with having a third. I try, but for a variety of reasons, I don't want another one, but I worry about my wife. Does anyone have any suggestions? It's a really tough situation, and can even be a marriage-breaker in some cases. I think you have to have both parents on board to choose to have a child, but it's really tough to want a child desperately and have to give up that dream because your partner doesn't want to have another. Our third was conceived when our first two were about the same ages yours are now, and it was great for us--but both of us were on board with having a third. I don't know that there's anything else for you to do but talk to each other and try to understand where each of you is coming from and look for some course of action you can both live with. Unfortunately, there isn't much available in the way of compromise--you'll either have another child or you won't--so you just have to work things out with as much love and respect as you can, and hope it's enough. Best wishes, Ericka |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Ericka Kammerer wrote: Scott wrote: My wife and I have an 8-year-old son, and a 5-year-old daughter. My wife would like a third. There are times when my wife accepts not having a third, but she'll frequently find herself wanting another. She is worried she'll regret not having another one, and the ones we have are growing some quickly. As much as I try, I can not come to terms with having a third. I try, but for a variety of reasons, I don't want another one, but I worry about my wife. Does anyone have any suggestions? It's a really tough situation, and can even be a marriage-breaker in some cases. When the issue is 'kids' vs. 'no kids' maybe, but you think a woman would break up a marriage because her husband doesn't want a third? That seems insane to me. In my opinion, if a couple already has two healthy children and disagree about having a third, the partner not wanting another child clearly has the upper hand. They should talk to a counselor if one of them is unhappy about this. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article .com, lenny
fackler says... Ericka Kammerer wrote: Scott wrote: My wife and I have an 8-year-old son, and a 5-year-old daughter. My wife would like a third. There are times when my wife accepts not having a third, but she'll frequently find herself wanting another. She is worried she'll regret not having another one, and the ones we have are growing some quickly. As much as I try, I can not come to terms with having a third. I try, but for a variety of reasons, I don't want another one, but I worry about my wife. Does anyone have any suggestions? It's a really tough situation, and can even be a marriage-breaker in some cases. When the issue is 'kids' vs. 'no kids' maybe, but you think a woman would break up a marriage because her husband doesn't want a third? That seems insane to me. In my opinion, if a couple already has two healthy children and disagree about having a third, the partner not wanting another child clearly has the upper hand. They should talk to a counselor if one of them is unhappy about this. If a marriage were to break up over this, it would be a case of this issue embodying overall issues in the marriage. Like how the couple communicate, negotiate, and have their needs and desires met or not met. While from a certain practical standpoint I can see the reasoning behind the no-child-is-trump conclusion, IMO the problem in a marriage is very often that one partner's viewpoint is considered trump too much of the time. The problem can be exactly that issues are looked at in that way - one having to justify their desires vs. the other considering their own way to be the norm. So statements about what should have 'the clear upper hand' and what 'trumps' go against the real consideration and acceptance of others' needs and dreams that should be happening here. It's a negotiation. If something is considered to 'trump', even if the eventual decision should be to stick to two kids, the discussion about WHY and how important various things are to the two partners won't happen. And it should happen. And, yes, perhaps her dreams regarding family size are very important and he has the ability to deal with not getting his way on this. Or not. But calling 'trump' may be exactly the problem which really is the problem when marriages breakup over something like this. Banty |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Banty wrote: In article .com, lenny fackler says... Ericka Kammerer wrote: Scott wrote: My wife and I have an 8-year-old son, and a 5-year-old daughter. My wife would like a third. There are times when my wife accepts not having a third, but she'll frequently find herself wanting another. She is worried she'll regret not having another one, and the ones we have are growing some quickly. As much as I try, I can not come to terms with having a third. I try, but for a variety of reasons, I don't want another one, but I worry about my wife. Does anyone have any suggestions? It's a really tough situation, and can even be a marriage-breaker in some cases. When the issue is 'kids' vs. 'no kids' maybe, but you think a woman would break up a marriage because her husband doesn't want a third? That seems insane to me. In my opinion, if a couple already has two healthy children and disagree about having a third, the partner not wanting another child clearly has the upper hand. They should talk to a counselor if one of them is unhappy about this. If a marriage were to break up over this, it would be a case of this issue embodying overall issues in the marriage. Like how the couple communicate, negotiate, and have their needs and desires met or not met. While from a certain practical standpoint I can see the reasoning behind the no-child-is-trump conclusion, IMO the problem in a marriage is very often that one partner's viewpoint is considered trump too much of the time. The problem can be exactly that issues are looked at in that way - one having to justify their desires vs. the other considering their own way to be the norm. So statements about what should have 'the clear upper hand' and what 'trumps' go against the real consideration and acceptance of others' needs and dreams that should be happening here. It's a negotiation. If something is considered to 'trump', even if the eventual decision should be to stick to two kids, the discussion about WHY and how important various things are to the two partners won't happen. And it should happen. And, yes, perhaps her dreams regarding family size are very important and he has the ability to deal with not getting his way on this. Or not. But calling 'trump' may be exactly the problem which really is the problem when marriages breakup over something like this. Banty That all makes a lot of sense. I was reacting to the 'marriage breaker' comment and made a blunt assessment without any assumptions about the way they communicate or other marriage dynamics. Obviously, the issue has to be worked through. If a marriage fails over the issue of 2 children vs. 3 then there was something wrong to start with. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
lenny fackler wrote:
Ericka Kammerer wrote: It's a really tough situation, and can even be a marriage-breaker in some cases. When the issue is 'kids' vs. 'no kids' maybe, but you think a woman would break up a marriage because her husband doesn't want a third? That seems insane to me. In my opinion, if a couple already has two healthy children and disagree about having a third, the partner not wanting another child clearly has the upper hand. Of course, because it's not ethical to force the other parent into parenting another child. However, there are certainly women (and men) who have felt such a strong desire for another child that they were unable to continue in a marriage where that could not happen. One hopes such decisions are made only after a best faith effort on both sides, and counseling, and so forth, but if after all that, the bottom line is that the desire for another child is paramount, it's likely to spell the end of the marriage. Best wishes, Ericka |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Ericka Kammerer wrote: lenny fackler wrote: Ericka Kammerer wrote: It's a really tough situation, and can even be a marriage-breaker in some cases. When the issue is 'kids' vs. 'no kids' maybe, but you think a woman would break up a marriage because her husband doesn't want a third? That seems insane to me. In my opinion, if a couple already has two healthy children and disagree about having a third, the partner not wanting another child clearly has the upper hand. Of course, because it's not ethical to force the other parent into parenting another child. However, there are certainly women (and men) who have felt such a strong desire for another child that they were unable to continue in a marriage where that could not happen. One hopes such decisions are made only after a best faith effort on both sides, and counseling, and so forth, but if after all that, the bottom line is that the desire for another child is paramount, it's likely to spell the end of the marriage. Maybe so, but if one person wants an additional child so badly that they would cause, or accept, or simply allow the destruction of their family, it would almost seem to me indicative of a mental illness or at least some serious underlying issues that having more kids isn't going to solve. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
lenny fackler wrote:
Maybe so, but if one person wants an additional child so badly that they would cause, or accept, or simply allow the destruction of their family, it would almost seem to me indicative of a mental illness or at least some serious underlying issues that having more kids isn't going to solve. I don't think that's necessarily true. Your statement is predicated upon certain values assumptions which not everyone might share. Also, the decision about having more kids tends to involve more than just the presence or absence of a child. It's also about family values and lifestyle and so forth. The person who very much wants another child likely has different ideas about those other things all wrapped up in the decision as well. Best wishes, Ericka |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"lenny fackler" wrote in message
ups.com... Maybe so, but if one person wants an additional child so badly that they would cause, or accept, or simply allow the destruction of their family, it would almost seem to me indicative of a mental illness or at least some serious underlying issues that having more kids isn't going to solve. Would you say the same if the couple were childless and one wanted one or more children while the other didn't? The desire to have more children than one currently has isn't more or less valid because one either does or does not have a particular number of them at present. -- Be well, Barbara Mom to Mr. Congeniality (7), the Diva (5) and the Race Car Fanatic (3) I have PMS and ESP...I'm the bitch who knows everything! (T-shirt slogan) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
lenny fackler wrote:
Ericka Kammerer wrote: lenny fackler wrote: Ericka Kammerer wrote: It's a really tough situation, and can even be a marriage-breaker in some cases. When the issue is 'kids' vs. 'no kids' maybe, but you think a woman would break up a marriage because her husband doesn't want a third? That seems insane to me. In my opinion, if a couple already has two healthy children and disagree about having a third, the partner not wanting another child clearly has the upper hand. Of course, because it's not ethical to force the other parent into parenting another child. However, there are certainly women (and men) who have felt such a strong desire for another child that they were unable to continue in a marriage where that could not happen. One hopes such decisions are made only after a best faith effort on both sides, and counseling, and so forth, but if after all that, the bottom line is that the desire for another child is paramount, it's likely to spell the end of the marriage. Maybe so, but if one person wants an additional child so badly that they would cause, or accept, or simply allow the destruction of their family, it would almost seem to me indicative of a mental illness or at least some serious underlying issues that having more kids isn't going to solve. You're saying that if someone accepts that they will not have another child they have some serious underlying issues? I think acceptance (not resignation) is a good thing. Mary Ann |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
<----------- KANE | nineballgirl | Spanking | 2 | September 30th 04 07:26 PM |
Sample Supreme Court Petition | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 0 | January 16th 04 03:47 AM |
Kids should work. | LaVonne Carlson | General | 22 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Foster Parents | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
| U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking | Kane | Spanking | 142 | November 16th 03 07:46 PM |