|
| If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
August 8th 06, 04:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Child support straight to child?
I am a father of a 16 year old boy (17 in two days) and he mentioned something to me the other day that has gotten me slightly concerned...
He said to me that someone he talks to mentioned to him that after a child turns 16 that the child support from the other parent is supposed to go straight to him. I, without thinking, denied this claim and went on watching TV, but I don't know if it's true, and I don't want to lose Child Support altogether... Does anyone know if this is true? And if so, how I can get out of it? 
|
|
#2
August 8th 06, 09:54 AM
posted to alt.child-support
|
|||
|
|||
|
Child support straight to child?
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 04:00:11 +0100, jackrose1965 wrote: I am a father of a 16 year old boy (17 in two days) and he mentioned something to me the other day that has gotten me slightly concerned... He said to me that someone he talks to mentioned to him that after a child turns 16 that the child support from the other parent is supposed to go straight to him. I, without thinking, denied this claim and went on watching TV, but I don't know if it's true, and I don't want to lose Child Support altogether... Does anyone know if this is true? And if so, how I can get out of it? I don't think it's true. Even if it is, what's the difference? If the CP is being used for it's intended purpose, then what difference does it make who gets it first? Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com
|
|
#3
August 8th 06, 09:08 PM
posted to alt.child-support
|
|||
|
|||
|
Child support straight to child?
jackrose1965 wrote:
: I am a father of a 16 year old boy (17 in two days) and he mentioned : something to me the other day that has gotten me slightly concerned... : He said to me that someone he talks to mentioned to him that after a : child turns 16 that the child support from the other parent is supposed : to go straight to him. I, without thinking, denied this claim and went : on watching TV, but I don't know if it's true, and I don't want to lose : Child Support altogether... : Does anyone know if this is true? And if so, how I can get out of it? Not true in California. I would find it hard to believe that any state would require payment directly to a non-adult. b.
|
|
#5
August 10th 06, 05:34 PM
posted to alt.child-support
|
|||
|
|||
|
Child support straight to child?
child support belongs to the child, not the mother but usually custodial
parent controls to 18 unless wasting money on her own expenses. "jackrose1965" wrote in message . .. I am a father of a 16 year old boy (17 in two days) and he mentioned something to me the other day that has gotten me slightly concerned... He said to me that someone he talks to mentioned to him that after a child turns 16 that the child support from the other parent is supposed to go straight to him. I, without thinking, denied this claim and went on watching TV, but I don't know if it's true, and I don't want to lose Child Support altogether... Does anyone know if this is true? And if so, how I can get out of it? -- jackrose1965
|
|
#6
August 12th 06, 09:06 AM
posted to alt.child-support
|
|||
|
|||
|
Child support straight to child?
wrote in message oups.com... jackrose1965 wrote: : I am a father of a 16 year old boy (17 in two days) and he mentioned : something to me the other day that has gotten me slightly concerned... : He said to me that someone he talks to mentioned to him that after a : child turns 16 that the child support from the other parent is supposed : to go straight to him. I, without thinking, denied this claim and went : on watching TV, but I don't know if it's true, and I don't want to lose : Child Support altogether... : Does anyone know if this is true? And if so, how I can get out of it? Not true in California. I would find it hard to believe that any state would require payment directly to a non-adult. And if the mother is 15? b.
|
|
#7
August 12th 06, 09:07 AM
posted to alt.child-support
|
|||
|
|||
|
Child support straight to child?
"dadslawyer" wrote in message news:OeJCg.8990$LF4.2733@dukeread05... child support belongs to the child, No it doesn't. It belongs to the man from whom it is being extorted. not the mother but usually custodial parent controls to 18 unless wasting money on her own expenses. "jackrose1965" wrote in message . .. I am a father of a 16 year old boy (17 in two days) and he mentioned something to me the other day that has gotten me slightly concerned... He said to me that someone he talks to mentioned to him that after a child turns 16 that the child support from the other parent is supposed to go straight to him. I, without thinking, denied this claim and went on watching TV, but I don't know if it's true, and I don't want to lose Child Support altogether... Does anyone know if this is true? And if so, how I can get out of it? -- jackrose1965
|
|
#8
August 12th 06, 04:38 PM
posted to alt.child-support
|
|||
|
|||
|
Child support straight to child?
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 04:00:11 +0100, jackrose1965
wrote: I am a father of a 16 year old boy (17 in two days) and he mentioned something to me the other day that has gotten me slightly concerned... He said to me that someone he talks to mentioned to him that after a child turns 16 that the child support from the other parent is supposed to go straight to him. I, without thinking, denied this claim and went on watching TV, but I don't know if it's true, and I don't want to lose Child Support altogether... Does anyone know if this is true? And if so, how I can get out of it? Think logically. If it were to be true, would it not defeat the (unadulterated) premise of child support which is to cause the absent parent to contribute to the child's needs whether or not he/she wishes to? Sidebar: I am very well aware that the concept does not work as planned in many cases, is used inappropriately in many cases, and is unnecessary in many cases. At any rate, unless a 16 year old can be legally held to the standard of providing his/her own necessities (i.e. held responsible for a contract for rent, medical care, etc... ), there is someone else held responsible. THAT is the person/agency to which the contribution is made. Beverly
|
|
#9
August 26th 06, 01:03 AM
posted to alt.child-support
|
|||
|
|||
|
Child support straight to child?
you pay for your play
"Chris" wrote in message news:E6hDg.989$0F5.521@fed1read04... "dadslawyer" wrote in message news:OeJCg.8990$LF4.2733@dukeread05... child support belongs to the child, No it doesn't. It belongs to the man from whom it is being extorted. not the mother but usually custodial parent controls to 18 unless wasting money on her own expenses. "jackrose1965" wrote in message . .. I am a father of a 16 year old boy (17 in two days) and he mentioned something to me the other day that has gotten me slightly concerned... He said to me that someone he talks to mentioned to him that after a child turns 16 that the child support from the other parent is supposed to go straight to him. I, without thinking, denied this claim and went on watching TV, but I don't know if it's true, and I don't want to lose Child Support altogether... Does anyone know if this is true? And if so, how I can get out of it? -- jackrose1965
|
|
#10
December 10th 06, 12:36 AM
posted to alt.child-support
|
|||
|
|||
|
Child support straight to child?
can we all say "GULLIBLE" LOL
Your kid is totally yanking your chain. Think of it this way, if you and the other parent were still together would you give him cash to eat or would you simply provide food in the house? tell him to come up with something better, he just needs to try a little harder "jackrose1965" wrote in message . .. I am a father of a 16 year old boy (17 in two days) and he mentione something to me the other day that has gotten me slightly concerned... He said to me that someone he talks to mentioned to him that after child turns 16 that the child support from the other parent is suppose to go straight to him. I, without thinking, denied this claim and wen on watching TV, but I don't know if it's true, and I don't want to los Child Support altogether... Does anyone know if this is true? And if so, how I can get out of it -- jackrose1965
|
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| We don need no steenkin' CPS. | 0:-> | Spanking | 223 | July 19th 06 07:32 AM |
| Canadian Judge ok's Dad's apanking in Calgary divorce case | Fern5827 | Spanking | 8 | October 4th 05 03:43 AM |
| Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court | Wizardlaw | Child Support | 12 | June 4th 04 02:19 AM |
| Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Spanking | 16 | December 7th 03 04:27 AM |
| Dennis was U.N. rules Canada should ban spanking | Kane | Spanking | 63 | November 17th 03 10:12 PM |
Linear Mode
