A Parenting & kids forum. ParentingBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » ParentingBanter.com forum » alt.support » Child Support
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old November 15th 06, 05:42 AM posted to alt.child-support
CasualObserver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 38
Default Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments

http://www.newarkadvocate.com/apps/p...318/1002/rss01

Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments
Agreement reached on all but attorney fees, county prosecutor says
By KENT MALLETT
Advocate Reporter

NEWARK -- A resolution may come soon for an Upper Arlington man who has
custody of his three children but is still required to pay child
support to his deceased ex-wife.

Ken Oswalt, assistant Licking County prosecutor, said an agreement has
been reached for everything except payment of attorney fees.

ADVERTISEMENT

"On all but one topic we have an agreement," Oswalt said. "It
terminates holding of money and clears up any and all monies. I'd hoped
to resolve all of this."
Joe Randolph, 44, has been told by Licking County Child Support
Enforcement Agency officials he must continue the payments of $1,300 a
month until a court tells him he can stop.

Sharon Buckingham, of Newark, died April 25 at age 40. The payments
have been held in escrow ever since.

About 15 members of Fathers-4-Justice protested the continued payments
Friday on the Courthouse Square in downtown Newark.

Nancy Johnson, director of the Licking County CSEA, said the situation
can't be resolved through an administrative order because she does not
have the authority to terminate child support.

Jerry Swank, attorney for Randolph, said last week he was confident a
solution was imminent, but now his hopes have dimmed.

"It's not resolved," Swank said. "I'm trying to resolve the whole
thing, and they're trying to resolve part of it."

County officials already have signed the agreement, Oswalt said.

"I figured we might have a disagreement on attorney fees," Oswalt said.
"I'm not sure the county is obligated to pay them. (Swank) could sign
it, and then we could have a hearing in January on attorney fees."

If no agreement is reached, the case will go to Domestic Relations
Court, which has a backlog of cases. The case probably would not be
heard until next year.

  #2  
Old November 16th 06, 04:58 PM posted to alt.child-support
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments


"CasualObserver" wrote in message
oups.com...

http://www.newarkadvocate.com/apps/p...318/1002/rss01

Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments
Agreement reached on all but attorney fees, county prosecutor says
By KENT MALLETT
Advocate Reporter

NEWARK -- A resolution may come soon for an Upper Arlington man who has
custody of his three children but is still required to pay child
support to his deceased ex-wife.

Ken Oswalt, assistant Licking County prosecutor, said an agreement has
been reached for everything except payment of attorney fees.

ADVERTISEMENT

"On all but one topic we have an agreement," Oswalt said. "It
terminates holding of money and clears up any and all monies. I'd hoped
to resolve all of this."
Joe Randolph, 44, has been told by Licking County Child Support
Enforcement Agency officials he must continue the payments of $1,300 a
month until a court tells him he can stop.

Sharon Buckingham, of Newark, died April 25 at age 40. The payments
have been held in escrow ever since.

About 15 members of Fathers-4-Justice protested the continued payments
Friday on the Courthouse Square in downtown Newark.

Nancy Johnson, director of the Licking County CSEA, said the situation
can't be resolved through an administrative order because she does not
have the authority to terminate child support.

Jerry Swank, attorney for Randolph, said last week he was confident a
solution was imminent, but now his hopes have dimmed.

"It's not resolved," Swank said. "I'm trying to resolve the whole
thing, and they're trying to resolve part of it."

County officials already have signed the agreement, Oswalt said.

"I figured we might have a disagreement on attorney fees," Oswalt said.
"I'm not sure the county is obligated to pay them. (Swank) could sign
it, and then we could have a hearing in January on attorney fees."

If no agreement is reached, the case will go to Domestic Relations
Court, which has a backlog of cases. The case probably would not be
heard until next year.


Not sure what the problem is. Kinda hard to pay money to someone who doesn't
exist.




  #3  
Old November 16th 06, 08:58 PM posted to alt.child-support
Werebat
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 109
Default Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments



Chris wrote:
"CasualObserver" wrote in message
oups.com...

http://www.newarkadvocate.com/apps/p...318/1002/rss01

Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments
Agreement reached on all but attorney fees, county prosecutor says
By KENT MALLETT
Advocate Reporter

NEWARK -- A resolution may come soon for an Upper Arlington man who has
custody of his three children but is still required to pay child
support to his deceased ex-wife.

Ken Oswalt, assistant Licking County prosecutor, said an agreement has
been reached for everything except payment of attorney fees.

ADVERTISEMENT

"On all but one topic we have an agreement," Oswalt said. "It
terminates holding of money and clears up any and all monies. I'd hoped
to resolve all of this."
Joe Randolph, 44, has been told by Licking County Child Support
Enforcement Agency officials he must continue the payments of $1,300 a
month until a court tells him he can stop.

Sharon Buckingham, of Newark, died April 25 at age 40. The payments
have been held in escrow ever since.

About 15 members of Fathers-4-Justice protested the continued payments
Friday on the Courthouse Square in downtown Newark.

Nancy Johnson, director of the Licking County CSEA, said the situation
can't be resolved through an administrative order because she does not
have the authority to terminate child support.

Jerry Swank, attorney for Randolph, said last week he was confident a
solution was imminent, but now his hopes have dimmed.

"It's not resolved," Swank said. "I'm trying to resolve the whole
thing, and they're trying to resolve part of it."

County officials already have signed the agreement, Oswalt said.

"I figured we might have a disagreement on attorney fees," Oswalt said.
"I'm not sure the county is obligated to pay them. (Swank) could sign
it, and then we could have a hearing in January on attorney fees."

If no agreement is reached, the case will go to Domestic Relations
Court, which has a backlog of cases. The case probably would not be
heard until next year.



Not sure what the problem is. Kinda hard to pay money to someone who doesn't
exist.


DCSE exists.

- Ron ^*^

  #4  
Old November 17th 06, 03:49 AM posted to alt.child-support
CasualObserver
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 38
Default Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments


Chris wrote:
"CasualObserver" wrote in message
oups.com...

http://www.newarkadvocate.com/apps/p...318/1002/rss01

Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments
Agreement reached on all but attorney fees, county prosecutor says
By KENT MALLETT
Advocate Reporter

NEWARK -- A resolution may come soon for an Upper Arlington man who has
custody of his three children but is still required to pay child
support to his deceased ex-wife.

Ken Oswalt, assistant Licking County prosecutor, said an agreement has
been reached for everything except payment of attorney fees.

ADVERTISEMENT

"On all but one topic we have an agreement," Oswalt said. "It
terminates holding of money and clears up any and all monies. I'd hoped
to resolve all of this."
Joe Randolph, 44, has been told by Licking County Child Support
Enforcement Agency officials he must continue the payments of $1,300 a
month until a court tells him he can stop.

Sharon Buckingham, of Newark, died April 25 at age 40. The payments
have been held in escrow ever since.

About 15 members of Fathers-4-Justice protested the continued payments
Friday on the Courthouse Square in downtown Newark.

Nancy Johnson, director of the Licking County CSEA, said the situation
can't be resolved through an administrative order because she does not
have the authority to terminate child support.

Jerry Swank, attorney for Randolph, said last week he was confident a
solution was imminent, but now his hopes have dimmed.

"It's not resolved," Swank said. "I'm trying to resolve the whole
thing, and they're trying to resolve part of it."

County officials already have signed the agreement, Oswalt said.

"I figured we might have a disagreement on attorney fees," Oswalt said.
"I'm not sure the county is obligated to pay them. (Swank) could sign
it, and then we could have a hearing in January on attorney fees."

If no agreement is reached, the case will go to Domestic Relations
Court, which has a backlog of cases. The case probably would not be
heard until next year.


Not sure what the problem is. Kinda hard to pay money to someone who doesn't
exist.



I was raised to believe that when a person dies they cant take it with
them. But it looks like the child-support system found a way around
that.

  #5  
Old November 17th 06, 08:04 AM posted to alt.child-support
Dale
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 95
Default Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments


"CasualObserver" wrote in

I was raised to believe that when a person dies they cant take it with
them. But it looks like the child-support system found a way around
that.


It's definetly a system that is far too out of control, no government agency
shoudl be granted this amount of power over people's personal lives. It's
very scary when that power is not monitored to keep it under control.


  #6  
Old November 18th 06, 05:08 AM posted to alt.child-support
Chris
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,421
Default Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments


"CasualObserver" wrote in message
oups.com...

Chris wrote:
"CasualObserver" wrote in message
oups.com...


http://www.newarkadvocate.com/apps/p...318/1002/rss01

Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments
Agreement reached on all but attorney fees, county prosecutor says
By KENT MALLETT
Advocate Reporter

NEWARK -- A resolution may come soon for an Upper Arlington man who

has
custody of his three children but is still required to pay child
support to his deceased ex-wife.

Ken Oswalt, assistant Licking County prosecutor, said an agreement has
been reached for everything except payment of attorney fees.

ADVERTISEMENT

"On all but one topic we have an agreement," Oswalt said. "It
terminates holding of money and clears up any and all monies. I'd

hoped
to resolve all of this."
Joe Randolph, 44, has been told by Licking County Child Support
Enforcement Agency officials he must continue the payments of $1,300 a
month until a court tells him he can stop.

Sharon Buckingham, of Newark, died April 25 at age 40. The payments
have been held in escrow ever since.

About 15 members of Fathers-4-Justice protested the continued payments
Friday on the Courthouse Square in downtown Newark.

Nancy Johnson, director of the Licking County CSEA, said the situation
can't be resolved through an administrative order because she does not
have the authority to terminate child support.

Jerry Swank, attorney for Randolph, said last week he was confident a
solution was imminent, but now his hopes have dimmed.

"It's not resolved," Swank said. "I'm trying to resolve the whole
thing, and they're trying to resolve part of it."

County officials already have signed the agreement, Oswalt said.

"I figured we might have a disagreement on attorney fees," Oswalt

said.
"I'm not sure the county is obligated to pay them. (Swank) could sign
it, and then we could have a hearing in January on attorney fees."

If no agreement is reached, the case will go to Domestic Relations
Court, which has a backlog of cases. The case probably would not be
heard until next year.


Not sure what the problem is. Kinda hard to pay money to someone who

doesn't
exist.



I was raised to believe that when a person dies they cant take it with
them. But it looks like the child-support system found a way around
that.


Indeed!





  #7  
Old December 18th 06, 02:40 AM posted to alt.child-support
John Meyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 302
Default Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments

This is sick.
It just shows that the CSE gives not a damn for a man, even to the
extent of making him pay money to a corpse. To even have the simple
COURTESY of asking the judge for a quick five minute hearing is not only
absurd, but inhumane as well.
I've been talking to Gini on this list about child support and when they
are considered gifts, and it seems that unless you have a CP who's
honest or a list of checks, all that money was ****ed away for nothing.
This is wrong and needs to stop.
We need a political action group. ANCPR might be a good start, but it's
not enough. All of us have to get involved in the political system,
executive, legislative, and judicial. Politicians and judges, as well
as the bureaucrats, must be made aware that you can poke a dog only so
long before he bites.
And to those who say it's in the name of the children? "It's in the
name of the children, it's in the name of the children, shut up and pay
your child support, it's in the name of the children." Would you let
them slit your throat if it was in the name of the children? Beat you?
Make you stand out on the street as a prostitute so the CP can get more
money. CSE cannot hide its crimes and it breaking up the family behind
the children. They can not look at the parent with one hand out, but
blame impotency when it comes to enforcing custody and parenting time.
Children deserve more than a paycheck; they deserve two families, and
they certainly aren't getting them through the current system.
I'd like to see ANCPR or somebody else put together an action list that
needs to be done before the next election, something that we can bring
to politicians and say we want action on this. We need a system that
makes it clear that child support is a LAST resort, not a first one, and
only after the NCP is unwilling or unable to take their children for
half of the year.
And as far as the lawyers and the bureaucrats that will oppose us and
bring out that dog of abused women, I just would say kiss off and ****
off, get the hell out of our way. We're going to do something, and that
something starts now.
I say this as the son of a true deadbeat father, one who refused to pay
his child support time and time again. Now those who refuse to help out
their children should be held accountable and made to pay, but there is
a big difference between a "dead beat" and a "beat dead" parent.
Sorry, I'll get off my political soapbox right now, but we need action.
  #8  
Old December 18th 06, 03:16 AM posted to alt.child-support
John Meyer
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 302
Default Resolution may be nearing on man's child support payments

Here's another question: what the hell are they going to do with that
money? If it went to the kids for college, maybe that's one thing, but
I doubt that.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GA: Child support changes stir passions Dusty Child Support 14 March 20th 06 10:16 PM
Canadian Judge ok's Dad's apanking in Calgary divorce case Fern5827 Spanking 8 October 4th 05 03:43 AM
OT The "Child's" Point Of View Pop Foster Parents 7 June 20th 05 03:13 AM
Paternity Fraud - US Supreme Court Wizardlaw Child Support 12 June 4th 04 02:19 AM
Kids should work. ChrisScaife Spanking 16 December 7th 03 05:27 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 ParentingBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.