CS related licene suspension question...

"Pamela" wrote in message
hlink.net...
I never respond to this stuff, but you know, I don't think taking a
person's
license for failure to provide for his children is extreme.

I have an ex who has not paid child support for years, may see his
daughter
whenever he wants, makes a great income, and cheats and steals his way
through life.

OK, try this one for size (mind the subtle sarcasm).. NCP -can't- pay the
ordered amount because it's way more then the NCP earns (include the fact
that the economy sucks and NCP has had little luck in retaining work in the
profession of choice). Because of the already existing restrictions placed
upon NCP, NCP can't see the children much beyond every few months. NCP
makes just barely enough to cover -basic- expenses (food, gas, phone,
etc..), so there's very little left over for yachting excisions to the
Mediterranean with Trophy Wife/Husband #5...

Taking his driver's license away seems a rather amusing way to wake him
up.
More I think about it, the more I like it.

I find the idea of license suspension hardly amusing at all. How is this in
the best interest of any NCPs children? How does this help CSE get what
they want, that being the NCPs wallet/purse?

We teach our children that there are consequences to what we do. Perhaps,
ex's who disregard the health and welfare of their children ought to be
taught the same lesson.

The same can (and often is) said of CSE agencies that overstep their
bounds - but far too often hide from their actions with "I was only
following orders"...

"Pamela" wrote in message
hlink.net...
I never respond to this stuff, but you know, I don't think taking a
person's
license for failure to provide for his children is extreme.

I have an ex who has not paid child support for years, may see his
daughter
whenever he wants, makes a great income, and cheats and steals his way
through life.

OK, try this one for size (mind the subtle sarcasm).. NCP -can't- pay the
ordered amount because it's way more then the NCP earns (include the fact
that the economy sucks and NCP has had little luck in retaining work in the
profession of choice). Because of the already existing restrictions placed
upon NCP, NCP can't see the children much beyond every few months. NCP
makes just barely enough to cover -basic- expenses (food, gas, phone,
etc..), so there's very little left over for yachting excisions to the
Mediterranean with Trophy Wife/Husband #5...

Taking his driver's license away seems a rather amusing way to wake him
up.
More I think about it, the more I like it.

I find the idea of license suspension hardly amusing at all. How is this in
the best interest of any NCPs children? How does this help CSE get what
they want, that being the NCPs wallet/purse?

We teach our children that there are consequences to what we do. Perhaps,
ex's who disregard the health and welfare of their children ought to be
taught the same lesson.

The same can (and often is) said of CSE agencies that overstep their
bounds - but far too often hide from their actions with "I was only
following orders"...

"Pamela" wrote in message
hlink.net...
I never respond to this stuff, but you know, I don't think taking a
person's
license for failure to provide for his children is extreme.

I have an ex who has not paid child support for years, may see his
daughter
whenever he wants, makes a great income, and cheats and steals his way
through life.

OK, try this one for size (mind the subtle sarcasm).. NCP -can't- pay the
ordered amount because it's way more then the NCP earns (include the fact
that the economy sucks and NCP has had little luck in retaining work in the
profession of choice). Because of the already existing restrictions placed
upon NCP, NCP can't see the children much beyond every few months. NCP
makes just barely enough to cover -basic- expenses (food, gas, phone,
etc..), so there's very little left over for yachting excisions to the
Mediterranean with Trophy Wife/Husband #5...

Taking his driver's license away seems a rather amusing way to wake him
up.
More I think about it, the more I like it.

I find the idea of license suspension hardly amusing at all. How is this in
the best interest of any NCPs children? How does this help CSE get what
they want, that being the NCPs wallet/purse?

We teach our children that there are consequences to what we do. Perhaps,
ex's who disregard the health and welfare of their children ought to be
taught the same lesson.

The same can (and often is) said of CSE agencies that overstep their
bounds - but far too often hide from their actions with "I was only
following orders"...

"The Dave©" wrote in message
...
Pamela wrote:
I never respond to this stuff, but you know, I don't think taking a
person's license for failure to provide for his children is extreme.

I have an ex who has not paid child support for years, may see his
daughter whenever he wants, makes a great income, and cheats and
steals his way through life.

Taking his driver's license away seems a rather amusing way to wake
him up. More I think about it, the more I like it.

We teach our children that there are consequences to what we do.
Perhaps, ex's who disregard the health and welfare of their children
ought to be taught the same lesson.

Differentiate "won't pay" and "can't pay". For those who are trying,
it just makes the problem worse. The kids are the ones who end up
suffering the most. Supposedly, we're trying to avoid that.

--
Whose cruel idea was it to put an 's' in the word lisp?


I am referring to those who can and won't. Seems to me a person who doesn't
pay for years and years, but works and lives reasonably well has decided he
won't.

Pamela

"The Dave©" wrote in message
...
Pamela wrote:
I never respond to this stuff, but you know, I don't think taking a
person's license for failure to provide for his children is extreme.

I have an ex who has not paid child support for years, may see his
daughter whenever he wants, makes a great income, and cheats and
steals his way through life.

Taking his driver's license away seems a rather amusing way to wake
him up. More I think about it, the more I like it.

We teach our children that there are consequences to what we do.
Perhaps, ex's who disregard the health and welfare of their children
ought to be taught the same lesson.

Differentiate "won't pay" and "can't pay". For those who are trying,
it just makes the problem worse. The kids are the ones who end up
suffering the most. Supposedly, we're trying to avoid that.

--
Whose cruel idea was it to put an 's' in the word lisp?


I am referring to those who can and won't. Seems to me a person who doesn't
pay for years and years, but works and lives reasonably well has decided he
won't.

Pamela

"The Dave©" wrote in message
...
Pamela wrote:
I never respond to this stuff, but you know, I don't think taking a
person's license for failure to provide for his children is extreme.

I have an ex who has not paid child support for years, may see his
daughter whenever he wants, makes a great income, and cheats and
steals his way through life.

Taking his driver's license away seems a rather amusing way to wake
him up. More I think about it, the more I like it.

We teach our children that there are consequences to what we do.
Perhaps, ex's who disregard the health and welfare of their children
ought to be taught the same lesson.

Differentiate "won't pay" and "can't pay". For those who are trying,
it just makes the problem worse. The kids are the ones who end up
suffering the most. Supposedly, we're trying to avoid that.

--
Whose cruel idea was it to put an 's' in the word lisp?


I am referring to those who can and won't. Seems to me a person who doesn't
pay for years and years, but works and lives reasonably well has decided he
won't.

Pamela

"The Dave©" wrote in message
...
Pamela wrote:
I never respond to this stuff, but you know, I don't think taking a
person's license for failure to provide for his children is extreme.

I have an ex who has not paid child support for years, may see his
daughter whenever he wants, makes a great income, and cheats and
steals his way through life.

Taking his driver's license away seems a rather amusing way to wake
him up. More I think about it, the more I like it.

We teach our children that there are consequences to what we do.
Perhaps, ex's who disregard the health and welfare of their children
ought to be taught the same lesson.

Differentiate "won't pay" and "can't pay". For those who are trying,
it just makes the problem worse. The kids are the ones who end up
suffering the most. Supposedly, we're trying to avoid that.

--
Whose cruel idea was it to put an 's' in the word lisp?


I am referring to those who can and won't. Seems to me a person who doesn't
pay for years and years, but works and lives reasonably well has decided he
won't.

Pamela

"Pamela" wrote in message
news

"The Dave©" wrote in message
...
Pamela wrote:
I never respond to this stuff, but you know, I don't think taking a
person's license for failure to provide for his children is extreme.

I have an ex who has not paid child support for years, may see his
daughter whenever he wants, makes a great income, and cheats and
steals his way through life.

Taking his driver's license away seems a rather amusing way to wake
him up. More I think about it, the more I like it.

We teach our children that there are consequences to what we do.
Perhaps, ex's who disregard the health and welfare of their children
ought to be taught the same lesson.

Differentiate "won't pay" and "can't pay". For those who are trying,
it just makes the problem worse. The kids are the ones who end up
suffering the most. Supposedly, we're trying to avoid that.

--
Whose cruel idea was it to put an 's' in the word lisp?


I am referring to those who can and won't. Seems to me a person who
doesn't
pay for years and years, but works and lives reasonably well has decided
he
won't.

And when they can't pay, what then? Is it to be "To bad, so sad, you
loose"? Or do you have some constructive opinion on the subject? It would
be interesting to hear, since you say you have the "classic" deadbeat, if
you have an idea to help those NCPs that are truly oppressed by CSE...

"Pamela" wrote in message
news

"The Dave©" wrote in message
...
Pamela wrote:
I never respond to this stuff, but you know, I don't think taking a
person's license for failure to provide for his children is extreme.

I have an ex who has not paid child support for years, may see his
daughter whenever he wants, makes a great income, and cheats and
steals his way through life.

Taking his driver's license away seems a rather amusing way to wake
him up. More I think about it, the more I like it.

We teach our children that there are consequences to what we do.
Perhaps, ex's who disregard the health and welfare of their children
ought to be taught the same lesson.

Differentiate "won't pay" and "can't pay". For those who are trying,
it just makes the problem worse. The kids are the ones who end up
suffering the most. Supposedly, we're trying to avoid that.

--
Whose cruel idea was it to put an 's' in the word lisp?


I am referring to those who can and won't. Seems to me a person who
doesn't
pay for years and years, but works and lives reasonably well has decided
he
won't.

And when they can't pay, what then? Is it to be "To bad, so sad, you
loose"? Or do you have some constructive opinion on the subject? It would
be interesting to hear, since you say you have the "classic" deadbeat, if
you have an idea to help those NCPs that are truly oppressed by CSE...

"Pamela" wrote in message
news

"The Dave©" wrote in message
...
Pamela wrote:
I never respond to this stuff, but you know, I don't think taking a
person's license for failure to provide for his children is extreme.

I have an ex who has not paid child support for years, may see his
daughter whenever he wants, makes a great income, and cheats and
steals his way through life.

Taking his driver's license away seems a rather amusing way to wake
him up. More I think about it, the more I like it.

We teach our children that there are consequences to what we do.
Perhaps, ex's who disregard the health and welfare of their children
ought to be taught the same lesson.

Differentiate "won't pay" and "can't pay". For those who are trying,
it just makes the problem worse. The kids are the ones who end up
suffering the most. Supposedly, we're trying to avoid that.

--
Whose cruel idea was it to put an 's' in the word lisp?


I am referring to those who can and won't. Seems to me a person who
doesn't
pay for years and years, but works and lives reasonably well has decided
he
won't.

And when they can't pay, what then? Is it to be "To bad, so sad, you
loose"? Or do you have some constructive opinion on the subject? It would
be interesting to hear, since you say you have the "classic" deadbeat, if
you have an idea to help those NCPs that are truly oppressed by CSE...