If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
Go Kiwi's Go!!!!!!!!!!!
Pip Fellow Kiwi P.S My Mum said the other day that they had finally come up with some documentation that proved that pavlova was invented in Australia after all Kiwi's please tell me this is not so! |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Sue writes:
: And I would not want to birth in your country. I feel that the medical : society in other countries are not as well versed in the technology that we : seem to have here. And there seems to be a lot of outdated information in : other countries. If a woman wants intervention, she can get it and if she : wants a lower intervention, then she can get that too. The point is there is : a choice and the woman needs to be informed and make informed choices based : on what is needed. : -- : Sue (mom to three girls) This is a woefully ignorant statement. Despite the use of technology, the US has one of the worst infant mortality rated of developed nations. There are MANY countires with higher homebirth rates which also have much lower infant mortality rates. A good example is the Netherlands, which has the highest homebirth rate in the world, but has one of the lowest infant mortality rates, much better than the United States. If you are going to make statements about informed choice, then you need to personally acquire a lot more information! Larry |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Daye wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 11:41:09 +1300, Unadulterated Me wrote: The first country to give women the right to vote Aussies claim that too. I wonder if this part of the NZ = part of Australia thing? Woman received the right to vote September 19, 1893. Australia gave woman the right to be elected to Parliament first...although we were the first to have a woman Prime Minister, we are on our second in fact ;-P http://www.iwdc.org/resources/timeline.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elective_rights http://www.dailypast.com/oceania/new...men-vote.shtml Andrea |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Elfanie wrote:
On Wed, 03 Nov 2004 09:28:37 +1300, Unadulterated Me wrote: Your the one living in the country that still has routine circ, Umm.... and...? Because many parents make a choice you obviously disagree with....? what's your point? My point is it's an outdated routine practice. If informed parents in your country want to lop the top of their sons penis more power to them. Your the ones that have the circ debates and wars, argue amongst yourselves, the rest of the world will leave you too it. eye ointment, compulsary vacination, vaccinations are encouraged. They aren't manditory. Not what some people in the US are posting, they are saying it's required by law in some states. Perhaps they are misinformed, since your such a self proclaimed childbirth and parenting know it all why don't you seek them out and *nod* or *splutter* or whatever the **** you do to patronise people, and tell them how wrong they are. If a woman wants intervention, she can get it And pay through the nose for it. Here she has the same choices and it's free. *snorts her soda and tries not to laugh* FREE? You think it's free?? Oh calm down before you blow a vein, you know what I meant, it's free as in the consumer does not pay for her maternity care, the government does. It's funded by our taxes, along with other general health care, education, roads and other things. True choice only occurs when woman have full access to a range of services, and are fully informed in order to make the right choice for them. I disagree. You would, pull the stick out from up your arse and get over yourself, the US isn't the be all end all, you suck, deal with it and **** off. Andrea |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Pip wrote:
Go Kiwi's Go!!!!!!!!!!! Pip Fellow Kiwi P.S My Mum said the other day that they had finally come up with some documentation that proved that pavlova was invented in Australia after all Kiwi's please tell me this is not so! Blasphemy!! No it's not true. http://www.stuff.co.nz/stuff/0,2106,3020282a11,00.html 01 September 2004 By GREG TOURELLE SYDNEY: They might have won more Olympic medals, but the Aussies have conceded the pavlova is a Kiwi concoction. Well, an Australian food historian has – and an Australian Broadcasting Corporation television programme has agreed with him that those "blasted Kiwis" have won this round of the raging trans-Tasman debate. They couldn't do much else, because a New Zealander has come up with proof of the pudding's existence in Godzone much earlier than the date the Aussies claim it originated in Perth. But Professor Helen Leach of Otago University admits her copy of the 1933 Rangiora Mothers' Union cookery book is a "minor victory" which won't end the argument. However, she is now researching a 1929 recipe which might give the New Zealand claims even more credence over the Aussies' Perth pav. The Australians have long claimed the light and fluffy meringue dessert as their own – based on a cake Bert Sachse baked at Perth's Esplanade Hotel in Perth in 1935. New Zealanders have rebuffed that their grandparents were scoffing pavlovas much earlier than that. The ABC's George Negus Tonight programme canvassed both sides of the debate in a light, fluffy manner last night, with Prof Leach and Australian food historian Michael Symons giving their views. Mr Symons conceded that New Zealanders had a recipe, often called a meringue cake but sometimes called a pavlova, before anything like that was named in Australia. "I can see why, in many ways, it is a healthy thing, a liberating thing for New Zealanders to feel proud of the fact that they are really the ones that invented the pavlova," he said. Prof Leach said her copy of the Rangiora book had "the correct name, with the correct ingredients and correct method" for cooking the pavlova cake, which was named after the famed Russian ballerina, Anna Pavlova, who toured Australia and New Zealand in 1926. "So, as you can imagine, I thought there was clearly something wrong with the Australian claim," she told the programme. Prof Leach, who studies the evolution of human diet and has researched the pavlova's origins for the past decade, said she had also had a copy of a 1929 recipe for the pavlova from a rural New Zealand publication. That recipe's author had a pseudonym and she wanted to carry out more research on it before revealing further details, she said today. She said there were a lot of different desserts in the 1920s and 30s called the pavlova. "The very earliest pavlova is a jelly, that might not have anything to do with Australia or New Zealand." Its recipe came in a Davis Gelatine Ltd cookbook published in 1926. But Davis Gelatine was a multinational company with branches in South Africa, Canada, Australia and New Zealand, so the recipe could have come from anywhere. The soft centred meringue dessert with cream on the top and a kiwifruit garnish that we know and cherish as the pav evolved from a filled cake. It was almost like a sponge cake with a filling between two pieces of meringue, Prof Leach said. "People realised that it was incredibly difficult to do without having fractures in the cake, so they left it as one piece and so instead of having a filling they just had a topping." Kiwifruit or chinese gooseberries did not arrive until after World War 2, and a variety of in-season fruit, including pineapple, strawberries and passionfruit was used to decorate the pavlova between the 1920s and 40s. Prof Leach's research showed Australia and New Zealand cooking in the 1920s and 30s was almost indistinguishable. "Recipes were flying across the Tasman in both directions. I have seen community recipe books from Australia from that time and they are almost the same." The problem was working out which side of the Tasman they originated. Bert Sachse's pavlova could have occurred independently of the earlier New Zealand pavs, or it might have been a case of memory reconstruction, said Prof Leach. "We don't know. The trouble is they seem rather similar." She doesn't think the identity of whoever made the slight change of ingredients from meringue cake to pavlova cake will ever be known – and thinks people on both sides of the Tasman prefer it that way. "I am convinced that no one wants it solved, so whatever I say the dispute will continue forever." |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Elfanie wrote:
Over 70 licensed and legal midwives in my state alone...and I don't life in one of the higher populated states... Now, Stephanie, you know I usually see eye to eye with you on many issues, but can you really say with a straight face that midwifery services (particularly homebirth midwifery services) are widely available in the US? Statistically speaking, only a very small proportion of CNMs do homebirths (and many can't get hospital privileges if they do), and in 16 states direct entry midwifery is *illegal* (and in others it is hard to find). And that's even before we get to third party reimbursement. I'll bet dollars to doughnuts that the majority of women in the US do not have access to a legal homebirth provider in their state within, say, an hour of their residence. Best wishes, Ericka |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Ericka Kammerer writes:
: Elfanie wrote: : Over 70 licensed and legal midwives in my state alone...and I don't : life in one of the higher populated states... : Now, Stephanie, you know I usually see eye to eye with : you on many issues, but can you really say with a straight face : that midwifery services (particularly homebirth midwifery services) : are widely available in the US? Statistically speaking, only a : very small proportion of CNMs do homebirths (and many can't get : hospital privileges if they do), and in 16 states direct entry : midwifery is *illegal* (and in others it is hard to find). And : that's even before we get to third party reimbursement. I'll : bet dollars to doughnuts that the majority of women in the US : do not have access to a legal homebirth provider in their state : within, say, an hour of their residence. : Best wishes, : Ericka I agree with Ericka, Stephanie. I wish Colette were still here to respond to you! :-) Larry |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Pip spake thusly
Go Kiwi's Go!!!!!!!!!!! Pip Fellow Kiwi P.S My Mum said the other day that they had finally come up with some documentation that proved that pavlova was invented in Australia after all Kiwi's please tell me this is not so! It's not so. You can rest easy! -- Maggie |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Unadulterated Me spake thusly
Elfanie wrote: I disagree. You would, pull the stick out from up your arse and get over yourself, the US isn't the be all end all, you suck, deal with it and **** off. ROTFLMAO! *wipes tears from eyes* (I apologise, I know, it's serious, but I really really needed that laugh today) -- Maggie |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
"Unadulterated Me" wrote in message ... Elfanie wrote: You would, pull the stick out from up your arse and get over yourself, the US isn't the be all end all, you suck, deal with it and **** off. LMAO. Tell us how you really feel Andrea. Nadene |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Birthing Balls/Spinal adjustments during pregnancy | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | August 18th 04 11:00 PM |
ACOG vs. Homebirth (also: Pregnant FDA employees: Helpful hint) | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | May 10th 04 06:25 PM |
Families needed to provide homes for children in need of protection | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 0 | April 1st 04 06:08 PM |
Homebirth - reasons for transfer... | Buzzy Bee | Pregnancy | 11 | February 11th 04 12:29 AM |
Lydia's Birthstory (long) | Andrea | Pregnancy | 29 | September 7th 03 07:23 AM |