If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Income imputed to recipient????
Does anyone know of any case where the recipient of child support has
had income attributed to her... In this case there are regular and significant cash deposits made into her bank account amounting to over 250k over 3 years... from her wealthy boyfriend... Can this amount be attributed to her as income for the purposes of the sharing of the private schooling, extra-curricular? Does anyone know of precedent cases that would be useful here? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Income imputed to recipient????
wrote in message ups.com... Does anyone know of any case where the recipient of child support has had income attributed to her... In this case there are regular and significant cash deposits made into her bank account amounting to over 250k over 3 years... from her wealthy boyfriend... Can this amount be attributed to her as income for the purposes of the sharing of the private schooling, extra-curricular? Does anyone know of precedent cases that would be useful here? The CS guidelines are constructed in such a way that the calculation methodology always awards very close to the same amount for the NCP to pay regardless of the income for the CP. Any CS modification determination should focus on how the NCP's income is treated in a hearing, not the income (imputed or not) for the CP. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Income imputed to recipient????
On Sep 27, 10:54?pm, "Bob Whiteside" wrote:
wrote in message ups.com... Does anyone know of any case where the recipient of child support has had income attributed to her... In this case there are regular and significant cash deposits made into her bank account amounting to over 250k over 3 years... from her wealthy boyfriend... Can this amount be attributed to her as income for the purposes of the sharing of the private schooling, extra-curricular? Does anyone know of precedent cases that would be useful here? The CS guidelines are constructed in such a way that the calculation methodology always awards very close to the same amount for the NCP to pay regardless of the income for the CP. Any CS modification determination should focus on how the NCP's income is treated in a hearing, not the income (imputed or not) for the CP. And some states dont even use the CP's income when determining CS to begin with. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Income imputed to recipient????
On Sep 27, 11:54 pm, "Bob Whiteside" wrote:
The CS guidelines are constructed in such a way that the calculation methodology always awards very close to the same amount for the NCP to pay regardless of the income for the CP. Any CS modification determination should focus on how the NCP's income is treated in a hearing, not the income (imputed or not) for the CP. This is not true for Massachusetts. CS for my son, per MA guidelines, goes from $171/week to $303/week depending on whether the CP's income is viewed as $0 or $35K per year. I don't know what state the OP is from and I realize many states don't even count CP income, but at least for certain states the CP income actual or attributed is very relevant. However as an NCP court-veteran I can't imagine the courts viewing "regular and significant cash deposits from a boyfriend" as income. They would view it as a gift. Don |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Income imputed to recipient????
On Sep 28, 10:39 am, don_1228 wrote:
On Sep 27, 11:54 pm, "Bob Whiteside" wrote: The CS guidelines are constructed in such a way that the calculation methodology always awards very close to the same amount for the NCP to pay regardless of the income for the CP. Any CS modification determination should focus on how the NCP's income is treated in a hearing, not the income (imputed or not) for the CP. This is not true for Massachusetts. CS for my son, per MA guidelines, goes from $171/week to $303/week depending on whether the CP's income is viewed as $0 or $35K per year. I don't know what state the OP is from and I realize many states don't even count CP income, but at least for certain states the CP income actual or attributed is very relevant. However as an NCP court-veteran I can't imagine the courts viewing "regular and significant cash deposits from a boyfriend" as income. They would view it as a gift. Don I'm actually in Canada where cash from a boyfriend is also typically considered a gift.... however, what if those deposits were regular... montly and amount to over 100k per year? .... and what if suddenly she's unemployed?... and what if she is not willing to prove that she's actively looking for work?.... and what if she's living a very high lifestyle based on those deposits and is claiming that now she has no income and that I should have to pay the lion's share of what we call "Section 7" or extra expenses, like private school and dance class and tutoring, etc? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Income imputed to recipient????
On Sep 28, 4:13 pm, "
wrote: On Sep 28, 10:39 am, don_1228 wrote: On Sep 27, 11:54 pm, "Bob Whiteside" wrote: The CS guidelines are constructed in such a way that the calculation methodology always awards very close to the same amount for the NCP to pay regardless of the income for the CP. Any CS modification determination should focus on how the NCP's income is treated in a hearing, not the income (imputed or not) for the CP. This is not true for Massachusetts. CS for my son, per MA guidelines, goes from $171/week to $303/week depending on whether the CP's income is viewed as $0 or $35K per year. I don't know what state the OP is from and I realize many states don't even count CP income, but at least for certain states the CP income actual or attributed is very relevant. However as an NCP court-veteran I can't imagine the courts viewing "regular and significant cash deposits from a boyfriend" as income. They would view it as a gift. Don I'm actually in Canada where cash from a boyfriend is also typically considered a gift.... however, what if those deposits were regular... montly and amount to over 100k per year? .... and what if suddenly she's unemployed?... and what if she is not willing to prove that she's actively looking for work?.... and what if she's living a very high lifestyle based on those deposits and is claiming that now she has no income and that I should have to pay the lion's share of what we call "Section 7" or extra expenses, like private school and dance class and tutoring, etc?- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - If she has a wealthy boyfriend it doesn't relieve the biological father from what the judge said is his monthly obligation. The court doesn't view a boyfriend/girlfriend's wife/husband's income relevant because the child is not genetically linked to the 3rd party, therefore; the child is not the responsibility of the 3rd party. Why don't the the two PARENTS, who are both adults, get together and work something out. How do you know what her bank deposits and statement are? |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Need More Income? | EME | General | 1 | September 7th 07 03:53 AM |
Washington State DSHS Imputed Income | judibri | Child Support | 2 | December 15th 04 01:32 PM |
Some questions about child support and imputed income | Scared To Reproduce | Child Support | 25 | September 10th 04 03:52 AM |
IL- Spouses income | August | Child Support | 0 | April 9th 04 01:31 PM |
limits on imputed income? | bleed-22 | Child Support | 3 | March 18th 04 02:44 PM |