If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#311
|
|||
|
|||
Things to think of before you get married again..
"Kenneth S." wrote ...................... As for me, I'm waiting until Anna Nicole Smith (aka the Widow Marshall) gets her hands on her deceased oilman husband's millions. THEN, I'll make my move. Is that good enough, "enquiring minds?" Does that take me out of your category of the "stupid men?" == Gawd, Kenneth--It is hardly fitting for you to denigrate the lovely Widow Marshall at the deepest hour in her life! Besides, it appears she has become quite smitten with the lawyer Stern and still will not give you the time of day. Not only that but now you've gone and upset the femimoron Fred who really is at her absolute worst these days! She's been having a really hard time keeping up around here. Just when she finishes researching one word someone goes and types another she doesn't understand and she has to go figure that one out (She likes Bob, you know). You really should not have brought any of this up. I don't think "enquiring minds" was even talking to you. |
#312
|
|||
|
|||
Things to think of before you get married again..
"Gini" wrote in message news:dOCYg.2111$IW6.1307@trndny01... "Kenneth S." wrote ..................... As for me, I'm waiting until Anna Nicole Smith (aka the Widow Marshall) gets her hands on her deceased oilman husband's millions. THEN, I'll make my move. Is that good enough, "enquiring minds?" Does that take me out of your category of the "stupid men?" == Gawd, Kenneth--It is hardly fitting for you to denigrate the lovely Widow Marshall at the deepest hour in her life! Besides, it appears she has become quite smitten with the lawyer Stern and still will not give you the time of day. Not only that but now you've gone and upset the femimoron Fred who really is at her absolute worst these days! She's been having a really hard time keeping up around here. Just when she finishes researching one word someone goes and types another she doesn't understand and she has to go figure that one out (She likes Bob, you know). You really should not have brought any of this up. I don't think "enquiring minds" was even talking to you. You know it has become quite fashionable to claim paternity for Anna Nichol's new baby. Lots of men want to get their name in the paper to brag about servicing Anna Nichol. It's fairly obvious one of those men forgot to wear a condom. |
#313
|
|||
|
|||
Things to think of before you get married again..
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ... "Gini" wrote in message news:dOCYg.2111$IW6.1307@trndny01... "Kenneth S." wrote ..................... As for me, I'm waiting until Anna Nicole Smith (aka the Widow Marshall) gets her hands on her deceased oilman husband's millions. THEN, I'll make my move. Is that good enough, "enquiring minds?" Does that take me out of your category of the "stupid men?" == Gawd, Kenneth--It is hardly fitting for you to denigrate the lovely Widow Marshall at the deepest hour in her life! Besides, it appears she has become quite smitten with the lawyer Stern and still will not give you the time of day. Not only that but now you've gone and upset the femimoron Fred who really is at her absolute worst these days! She's been having a really hard time keeping up around here. Just when she finishes researching one word someone goes and types another she doesn't understand and she has to go figure that one out (She likes Bob, you know). You really should not have brought any of this up. I don't think "enquiring minds" was even talking to you. You know it has become quite fashionable to claim paternity for Anna Nichol's new baby. Lots of men want to get their name in the paper to brag about servicing Anna Nichol. It's fairly obvious one of those men forgot to wear a condom. You mean one of those not bright, mentally challenged idiots that enquiringlymindless talked about? |
#314
|
|||
|
|||
Things to think of before you get married again..
"teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ... "Gini" wrote in message news:dOCYg.2111$IW6.1307@trndny01... "Kenneth S." wrote ..................... As for me, I'm waiting until Anna Nicole Smith (aka the Widow Marshall) gets her hands on her deceased oilman husband's millions. THEN, I'll make my move. Is that good enough, "enquiring minds?" Does that take me out of your category of the "stupid men?" == Gawd, Kenneth--It is hardly fitting for you to denigrate the lovely Widow Marshall at the deepest hour in her life! Besides, it appears she has become quite smitten with the lawyer Stern and still will not give you the time of day. Not only that but now you've gone and upset the femimoron Fred who really is at her absolute worst these days! She's been having a really hard time keeping up around here. Just when she finishes researching one word someone goes and types another she doesn't understand and she has to go figure that one out (She likes Bob, you know). You really should not have brought any of this up. I don't think "enquiring minds" was even talking to you. You know it has become quite fashionable to claim paternity for Anna Nichol's new baby. Lots of men want to get their name in the paper to brag about servicing Anna Nichol. It's fairly obvious one of those men forgot to wear a condom. You mean one of those not bright, mentally challenged idiots that enquiringlymindless talked about? Actually, I think enquiring minds is on to something with her theory. The Anna Nicole case is a wonderful example of how her theory would work in practice. If men only had sex with women with more money (like Anna Nicole) and the woman got pregnant, the men would come out of the woodwork making false claims of paternity to get access to her money. It would be a race to the court house to secure a paternity order. And if enough men claimed they were the father, the paternity winner could claim the mother was unfit because of her sexual indiscretion with so many different men and "father" would get custody of the child. That way the higher income woman would be forced to pay CS to the father (bio or not) and he would be set for life. Think about it. It's a wonderful plan! |
#315
|
|||
|
|||
Things to think of before you get married again..
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ... "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ... "Gini" wrote in message news:dOCYg.2111$IW6.1307@trndny01... "Kenneth S." wrote ..................... As for me, I'm waiting until Anna Nicole Smith (aka the Widow Marshall) gets her hands on her deceased oilman husband's millions. THEN, I'll make my move. Is that good enough, "enquiring minds?" Does that take me out of your category of the "stupid men?" == Gawd, Kenneth--It is hardly fitting for you to denigrate the lovely Widow Marshall at the deepest hour in her life! Besides, it appears she has become quite smitten with the lawyer Stern and still will not give you the time of day. Not only that but now you've gone and upset the femimoron Fred who really is at her absolute worst these days! She's been having a really hard time keeping up around here. Just when she finishes researching one word someone goes and types another she doesn't understand and she has to go figure that one out (She likes Bob, you know). You really should not have brought any of this up. I don't think "enquiring minds" was even talking to you. You know it has become quite fashionable to claim paternity for Anna Nichol's new baby. Lots of men want to get their name in the paper to brag about servicing Anna Nichol. It's fairly obvious one of those men forgot to wear a condom. You mean one of those not bright, mentally challenged idiots that enquiringlymindless talked about? Actually, I think enquiring minds is on to something with her theory. The Anna Nicole case is a wonderful example of how her theory would work in practice. If men only had sex with women with more money (like Anna Nicole) and the woman got pregnant, the men would come out of the woodwork making false claims of paternity to get access to her money. It would be a race to the court house to secure a paternity order. And if enough men claimed they were the father, the paternity winner could claim the mother was unfit because of her sexual indiscretion with so many different men and "father" would get custody of the child. That way the higher income woman would be forced to pay CS to the father (bio or not) and he would be set for life. Think about it. It's a wonderful plan! chuckle Don't give enquiringbutmindless any ideas, Bob. She might advertise herself as rich just to get that many guys that she could name as fathers. |
#316
|
|||
|
|||
Things to think of before you get married again..
"Bob Whiteside" wrote "teachrmama" wrote "Bob Whiteside" wrote .................................. You know it has become quite fashionable to claim paternity for Anna Nichol's new baby. Lots of men want to get their name in the paper to brag about servicing Anna Nichol. It's fairly obvious one of those men forgot to wear a condom. You mean one of those not bright, mentally challenged idiots that enquiringlymindless talked about? Actually, I think enquiring minds is on to something with her theory. The Anna Nicole case is a wonderful example of how her theory would work in practice. If men only had sex with women with more money (like Anna Nicole) and the woman got pregnant, the men would come out of the woodwork making false claims of paternity to get access to her money. It would be a race to the court house to secure a paternity order. And if enough men claimed they were the father, the paternity winner could claim the mother was unfit because of her sexual indiscretion with so many different men and "father" would get custody of the child. That way the higher income woman would be forced to pay CS to the father (bio or not) and he would be set for life. Think about it. It's a wonderful plan! == Sorry Bob, that's not how the system works. See, if 4 men request paternity, mother custody would be maintained and the lot would be ordered to pay. I think Kenneth could be on shaky ground here. |
#317
|
|||
|
|||
Things to think of before you get married again..
"Gini" wrote in message news:9hGYg.3970$5v5.927@trndny08... "Bob Whiteside" wrote "teachrmama" wrote "Bob Whiteside" wrote ................................. You know it has become quite fashionable to claim paternity for Anna Nichol's new baby. Lots of men want to get their name in the paper to brag about servicing Anna Nichol. It's fairly obvious one of those men forgot to wear a condom. You mean one of those not bright, mentally challenged idiots that enquiringlymindless talked about? Actually, I think enquiring minds is on to something with her theory. The Anna Nicole case is a wonderful example of how her theory would work in practice. If men only had sex with women with more money (like Anna Nicole) and the woman got pregnant, the men would come out of the woodwork making false claims of paternity to get access to her money. It would be a race to the court house to secure a paternity order. And if enough men claimed they were the father, the paternity winner could claim the mother was unfit because of her sexual indiscretion with so many different men and "father" would get custody of the child. That way the higher income woman would be forced to pay CS to the father (bio or not) and he would be set for life. Think about it. It's a wonderful plan! == Sorry Bob, that's not how the system works. See, if 4 men request paternity, mother custody would be maintained and the lot would be ordered to pay. I think Kenneth could be on shaky ground here. I was trhinking about that earlier. If a woman filed for child support from 4 different guys in 4 different states, could she actually get CS from all 4? Or is there some way for the states to check and make sure she isn't doing that? |
#318
|
|||
|
|||
Things to think of before you get married again..
Anyone who follows the outcome of lawsuits over prenuptial contracts
knows that the extent to which they protect those who enter into them is severely limited. In the first place, courts make use of the phony "contrary to public policy" argument to rule out any contracts that cover the really important issues like custody of the children. Secondly, even in regard to financial assets, no man should rely on a prenuptial contract as a guarantee that a court in the future will not award to his soon to be ex-wife a good proportion of the assets that he has built up. I'm not saying that prenuptial contracts are worthless. They're better than nothing. But all the "stupid men" that Fred/enquiring minds is so concerned about had better not place too much trust in them. Better to follow the advice of Fred/enquiring minds, and marry a woman who's much wealthier, and let HER worry about what happens if there's a divorce. (But don't tell Anna Nicole Smith that I said this -- I don't want to jinx our relationship.) "Fred" wrote in message . net... Kenneth S. wrote: "Enquiring minds" makes frequent references in her comments below to "stupid men," and the various ways in which they show their stupidity. That is a distortion. I searched the message in question for the phrase "stupid men", and what I found was the phrase, "this relates to stupid men who marry women who earn less than they do." However, the whole tone of her message suggests that any man who has any intimate contact with a woman is stupid -- particularly if the woman exhibits the attitudes shown by "enquiring minds." More distortions ... This is the kind of message that tells us much more about "enquiring minds" than it does about the issues being discussed here. ... and yet more. Dusty is right. The balance of power between the sexes HAS been destroyed. Y'all masculinists aren't talking about balance of power. y'all are talking about male superiority and dominance over women, specifically by controlling the money. So it's real simple: if you want to control the money, execute a pre-nup. I am a big fan of pre-nups, because they spell out the responsibilities of the parties. That's always a good thing, in my opinion. It is simply the smart thing to do. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | February 28th 05 05:27 AM |
Parent-Child Negotiations | Nathan A. Barclay | Spanking | 623 | January 28th 05 04:24 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | December 29th 04 05:26 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | November 28th 04 05:16 AM |
misc.kids FAQ on Good things about having kids | [email protected] | Info and FAQ's | 0 | June 28th 04 07:42 PM |