If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Canadian Judge ok's Dad's apanking in Calgary divorce case
http://www.canoe.ca/NewsStand/Calgar...09/532794.html
Fri, July 9, 2004 Judge OKs spanking Dad's actions ruled reasonable By KEVIN MARTIN, CALGARY SUN Spanking his eight-year-old son after the boy threatened to "grab a lawyer" and sue him wasn't a criminal act by a city dad, a judge ruled yesterday. Judge Bob Wilkins said James Dean Boyd exercised reasonable force when he disciplined his son 19 months ago. "The force used by the accused falls within the scope enunciated by the Supreme Court of Canada and was 'a minor corrective force of a transitory and trifling nature,'" Wilkins said. "The action of the accused in spanking his son was for corrective purposes." Police were called by Boyd's ex-wife after she discovered bruising on the child's bum after he was returned to her Nov. 23, 2002, following an access visit. Defence lawyer Joel Livergant argued the bruising occurred while the child was tobogganing, but Wilkins said without medical evidence, he could not say what caused the injury. Boyd admitted spanking the child three times on the behind for disciplinary reasons after the child had acted up and told the father to "shut up." The incident occurred at Boyd's brother's home and involved a dispute between the child, whom Wilkins did not identify by name, and his cousins. The judge noted the boy stood on stairs, yelling "I hate this place, I hate you, I'm going to grab a lawyer, I'm going to sue you all and I'm going to live in a foster home." "This outburst was followed by the child telling his father to 'shut up,'" Wilkins said. "I accept his explanation that the spanking was done for corrective purposes, as a last resort and was not done out of anger, maliciousness or revenge," the judge said. Wilkins said the Criminal Code permits persons in authority to use force for discipline as long as it is reasonable under the circumstances. He said Boyd's actions were intended to be for educative or corrective purposes and the force used was not excessive. Outside court, a relieved Boyd said it's important to have legislation that protects a parent's right to discipline a child. "It just reinforces, or gives the parent the opportunity to reinforce a verbal command with a reasonable amount of force," he said. "To let young people know ... there's a consequence for their actions." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Most families *at risk* w CPS' assessment tools broad, vague | Kane | General | 13 | February 20th 04 06:02 PM |
Canadian Court Rethinks Spanking | Hammer | Spanking | 0 | January 25th 04 07:54 PM |