If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Sad story
Donna Metler wrote:
There are SO many people out there advocating for VBAC, non-interventionist childbirth, home birth, etc, that it would be easy to convince yourself that the doctors are wrong if they tell you that they expect complications. After all, having babies is easy, millions of women do it, right? And if that's what you want, it's easy to convince yourself of that. There's some of that, but I think that the medical folks have to take some of that blame as well for crying wolf all this time. When you claim all sorts of things that are demonstrably untrue, you're practically begging people not to believe you when what you're saying *is* true. I would dispute that there are SO many people out there advocating for low intervention birth. There are many here, but in real life, I find they're few and far between. There are far more people willing to tell me I'm crackers for wanting to avoid an epidural than there are people willing to tell women choosing high intervention births that they should rethink their plans. I suspect Angela may have the right of it--that something about her previous c-section experience and sequelae made her bound and determined not to have that experience again, even if it meant taking risks others would see as foolish. (Not that that's rational, but her experience may have been such that she was not capable of rational thought about this particular issue.) Also, when it comes to at least frank breeches, with an experienced caregiver, the additional risk of a vaginal delivery is *very* small. The problem now is that there are very few caregivers experienced in vaginal breech births, and there are many ways to do the wrong thing and make the situation far more risky. So, what was once only a mild additional risk has become a significant additional risk through loss of knowledge and experience. It also provides an opportunity for confusion, because there are several studies done that show little increased risk--but they were done before that knowledge became so much more scarce. I pity her-because now not only will she have to deal with the guilt and pain of a loss, but realize that there's a good chance that her choices caused it. And that's a pain I would hate to see anyone go through. Absolutely. Best wishes, Ericka |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Review: A Cinderella Story (* 1/2) | Steve Rhodes | General | 0 | July 20th 04 05:22 AM |
Review: Dodgeball: A True Underdog Story (***) | Steve Rhodes | General | 0 | June 16th 04 01:02 AM |
Birth story: very late and *extremely* long | Sidheag McCormack | Pregnancy | 14 | December 13th 03 08:37 PM |
My Story - Pretty Long (sorry) | The Huwe Family | Pregnancy | 19 | October 4th 03 07:03 PM |
| Dateline & Spanking *Blood Brothers* Discrepancy in story | Kane | General | 29 | September 28th 03 10:51 AM |