If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
alternatives to 100% breastfeeding
"Vicky Bilaniuk" wrote in message
.. . OK, I hate to say this, but practically everything I read on this ng about breastfeeding is actually turning me away from it. (perhaps it's good that I read all of this *before* diving into the situation, so I thank everyone, even though this is probably not the reaction that some of you would rather see) Remember that people pretty much only post to get help when they're having trouble. What you are reading is not necessarily any indication of what you would experience. Many people have no trouble with breastfeeding at all -- after all, it is evolutionarily necessary that we be able to nurse our babies. Round-the-clock nursing during growth spurts is admittedly pretty much routine, but they generally last for only a couple days at a time. If you anticipate them and know that's what's going on it makes it easier to tolerate because you know it's only temporary. I'm currently 100% nursing and I think it's really nice when the baby gets hungry, I just feed him, instantly. I don't even have to get up, I just stay sitting right where I am. I just hate washing dishes and have less than no desire to add a lot of bottles to the dishwashing chore. YMMV on what you think is easier. One more question: how long would it take to basically pump yourself dry? This would depend entirely on how much you supplement. The more you use formula, the less breastmilk your body will produce, and the sooner you would "dry up". Some people who have not used any formula have fed pumped EBM for over a year, but that requires more work and dedication than just breastfeeding would, IMO. When Jaden was 3 months old he suddenly refused to nurse on my left side. I pumped on that side for a few weeks to keep up supply in the hope he would go back to it but that didn't happen, so I quit pumping. (It's been no trouble at all to feed him exclusively from my right side.) I found pumping to be incredibly tedious and would have loved to be able to just nurse directly instead of pump. It is so much easier to nurse, IMO. I don't want to discourage you from pumping if that is what you want to do, I'm just saying, don't assume it will be easier than nursing. Give nursing a try, because you won't know how it is for *you*, unless you do. If I don't breastfeed and instead pump for the first couple of months, or something, I can go on the drugs sooner rather than later, Why? If the drugs are truly contraindicated for breastfeeding, it won't be safe to use your EBM either. -- Cheryl S. Mom to Julie, 3, and Jaden, 6 months |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
alternatives to 100% breastfeeding
I'm sorry, but someone has to be the bad guy. I'll do it. Hope you all can
see this for the truth that it is, and not hate me. Unless you are incredible committed to pumping - round the clock, likely - you will end up giving your little one artificial milk at some point. Please reconsider! Formula feeding will affect your child for life. Presenting this issue as a "personal decision" does not give proper weight to the negative impact of artificial feeding. Would you consider smoking around your baby, putting baby to sleep on his stomach, or deliberately exposing your little one to germs? Of course not! But artificial feeding has PROVEN, LIFELONG effects on a very small being who cannot defend itself. This decision should not be taken lightly (just because you are "turned away"). Babies fed artificial milk have lower IQ's than babies given human milk. Artificially fed babies have a higher incidence of infection, anemia, diarrhea, meningitis, diabetes, gastroenteritis, asthma, constipation, allergies, celiac disease, Crohn's disease, dental and speech problems, childhood cancer, pulmonary disease, cataracts, high cholesterol, and many more. Artificially fed babies are three to four times as likely as breastfed infants to suffer from ear infections and lower respiratory infections, and sixteen times more likely to be sick during the first two months of life. As for medications, I'll cut and paste from promom.com. "Over the years, many, many, many women have been wrongly told to stop breastfeeding. The decision about continuing breastfeeding when the mother must take a drug, for example, involves more than consideration of whether the medication appears in the mother's milk. It also involves taking into consideration the risks of formula feeding for the baby, which are substantial, the risks of not breastfeeding for the mother, which are substantial, and other issues as well. Breastfeeding and Maternal Medication Most drugs appear in the milk, but only in very tiny amounts. Although a very few drugs may still cause problems for infants even in tiny doses, this is not the case for the vast majority. Mothers who are told they must stop breastfeeding because of a certain drug should ask to be prescribed an alternative medication which is acceptable for breastfeeding mothers. In this day and age, it is rarely a problem to find such an alternative. If the prescribing physician does not know how to proceed, s/he should get more information. If the prescribing physician is not flexible, the mother should seek another opinion. Most drugs may be considered safe for the mother to take and continue breastfeeding if: 1. they are commonly prescribed for infants. Examples are amoxycillin, cloxacillin, most antibiotics. 2. they are considered safe in pregnancy. Drugs enter directly into the baby's bloodstream when used during pregnancy. The baby generally gets much higher doses at a much more sensitive period during pregnancy, than during breastfeeding. This is not an absolute, however, as during pregnancy, the mother's liver and kidneys will get rid of the drug for the baby. 3. they are not absorbed from the stomach or intestines. These include many drugs which are given by injection. Examples are gentamicin, heparin, lidocaine or other local anaesthetics used by dentists. The following frequently used drugs are also generally safe during breastfeeding: acetaminophen (Tylenol, Tempra), alcohol (in reasonable amounts), aspirin (in usual doses, for short periods), most antiepileptic medications, most antihypertensive medications, tetracycline, codeine, most nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications, prednisone, thyroxine, propylthiouracil (PTU), warfarin, tricyclic antidepressant medications, sertraline (Zoloft), paroxetine (Paxil), other antidepressants, metronidazole (Flagyl), Nix, Kwellada. Medications applied to the skin, inhaled or applied to the eyes or nose are almost always safe for breastfeeding. You can still breastfeeding after general, regional or local anaesthesia. As soon as you are up to it. Medications you might take afterwards for pain are almost always permitted. Immunizations given to the mother do not require her to stop breastfeeding (including with live viruses such as german measles, Hepatitis A and B). Get reliable information before stopping breastfeeding. Once you have stopped it may be very difficult to restart, especially if the baby is very young. I hope you can make the right decision for your child - and yourself (have you looked at breast cancer rates lately?!?) Hannah BTW, your DH can lactate if he desires . . . "Vicky Bilaniuk" wrote in message .. . OK, I hate to say this, but practically everything I read on this ng about breastfeeding is actually turning me away from it. (perhaps it's good that I read all of this *before* diving into the situation, so I thank everyone, even though this is probably not the reaction that some of you would rather see) I would like to know more about the alternatives. So, we've got 100% bottle feeding, or supplementing breastmilk with formula. Someone posted and said that she had pumped at first until her supply ran dry. I forget who that was and am too brain dead to do a google search (my apologies - really not feeling well these days). I'm hoping that she's reading and can post and give more details. I would like to know more about her experiences. I also know that Daye pumped for the first 6 weeks. One more question: how long would it take to basically pump yourself dry? I am not implying that if I did this, I would be in a hurry (if I were in a hurry I would just put up with the initial engorgement and never pump at all). I am just curious about how much one might be able to expect to get. Maybe Daye can help out here. Was it extremely difficult to get 6 weeks out of pumping? I'm leaning more and more towards the idea of pumping and bottle feeding (using EBM and formula as needed). Personal reasons, as well as a skin condition that has been haunting me for a long time (was going to see specialists about it and how to deal with it during BFing - will have to go on nasty drugs after baby and breastfeeding are all done), are the driving factors, here. I never wanted to breastfeed, but DH managed to get me to change my mind. However, reading about other peoples' experiences is making me go back to what I originally wanted (probably much to DH's annoyance, but if he complains, I'll tell him to grow breasts and do it himself). If I don't breastfeed and instead pump for the first couple of months, or something, I can go on the drugs sooner rather than later, and with supplementing, hopefully I won't experience some of the things I've read about here regarding breastfeeding a newborn. I don't want to lose my mind. I've lost enough of it already. ;-) I know I'm being bitchier than normal, but I can't help it. My apologies for the tone of this post. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
alternatives to 100% breastfeeding
Vicky,
You must of course make the decision that's right for you. I found the early weeks of breastfeeding very hard, but was so glad I'd persisted later on. Just check your skin condition can't be treated with breastfeeding friendly drugs, most can. Finally if you are thinking about mixed feeding please be aware of what one bottle can do.: http://www.drjaygordon.com/bf/supplement.htm You can then make your decision with the full facts to be right for your own family. Serenity |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
alternatives to 100% breastfeeding
"Luna" wrote in message link.net... I'm sorry, but someone has to be the bad guy. I'll do it. Hope you all can see this for the truth that it is, and not hate me. Unless you are incredible committed to pumping - round the clock, likely - you will end up giving your little one artificial milk at some point. Please reconsider! Formula feeding will affect your child for life. Presenting this issue as a "personal decision" does not give proper weight to the negative impact of artificial feeding. Would you consider smoking around your baby, putting baby to sleep on his stomach, or deliberately exposing your little one to germs? Of course not! But artificial feeding has PROVEN, LIFELONG effects on a very small being who cannot defend itself. This decision should not be taken lightly (just because you are "turned away"). Babies fed artificial milk have lower IQ's than babies given human milk. Artificially fed babies have a higher incidence of infection, anemia, diarrhea, meningitis, diabetes, gastroenteritis, asthma, constipation, allergies, celiac disease, Crohn's disease, dental and speech problems, childhood cancer, pulmonary disease, cataracts, high cholesterol, and many more. Artificially fed babies are three to four times as likely as breastfed infants to suffer from ear infections and lower respiratory infections, and sixteen times more likely to be sick during the first two months of life. I don't hate you, but I think your argument will have the opposite of your intended effect. Lots of us do things that are not recommended, though we may not want to admit to it. FWIW, there are plenty of BF'ers who smoke or put babies to sleep on their tummies or expose them to germs. The OP no doubt knows the statistics. To the OP, I didn't think I'd BF for more than 6 wks and I did it for 21 months with my first. Why not try it to see how you do and wean when you need to for your meds? You may find you enjoy it more than you think. Maybe not, but you never know until you try. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
alternatives to 100% breastfeeding
Vicky Bilaniuk wrote:
OK, I hate to say this, but practically everything I read on this ng about breastfeeding is actually turning me away from it. Bottom line: do what works for you. That said, m.k.p is about solving problems, and breastfeeding problems here tend to involve newborns! Their mothers haven't yet gotten into m.k.bf. I have been posting for help with my breastfeeding problems, and not saying much about the successes. That's because I have almost zero time for any non-emergency posting. So, for the record, and to offer you a little reassurance that, whatever you decide, you will be able to deal with it: on the whole my breastfeeding problems have been of very short duration and easily solved. In some cases, just passage of time is enough to fix them; each new day brings a new problem and more often than not a new solution to yesterday's problem. I have been exhausted and frustrated to tears, but in retrospect that had a lot more to do with my lack of sleep (trying to be supermom, trying to resume too much of my old life too soon) and not really due to the problems per se. So don't be too quick to abandon breastfeeding for the sake of avoiding problems: it won't work! You will have them in either case, and you will solve them. Hang in there. Pologirl |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
alternatives to 100% breastfeeding
Jill wrote:
"Vicky Bilaniuk" wrote I'm leaning more and more towards the idea of pumping and bottle feeding (using EBM and formula as needed). Personal reasons, as well as a skin condition that has been haunting me for a long time (was going to see specialists about it and how to deal with it during BFing - will have to go on nasty drugs after baby snip, etc Hey, that's ok-- you don't have to justify your decision, it's a personal one, and no one should judge you for making it. My midwife was telling me that she thinks a lot more people would give breastfeed a try or stick to it, if bf advocates wouldn't jump on them for not making a 100%, no-choice, all bf all the time decision etc. The midwife told me she actually has quite a few patients who use both formula and bf too, and are succesful and happy and have no problems. I can't help you since I am clueless about bf-ing and have so much to learn and no experience! But just wanted to say that my midwife did mention that a lot of people do what you are asking about, with no problems. And that your decision is a personal one and is the best decision for you Thanks, Jill. Actually, I have a midwife appointment coming up in a couple of days, so maybe I'll ask her about it. They've got a lot of reading material there, too. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
alternatives to 100% breastfeeding
Clisby wrote:
Why would pumping rather than BF allow you to take the drugs sooner? I think I'm missing something here. It's assuming that I would stop sooner, rather than going for, say, a whole year. I read in many other posts that pumping doesn't get as much milk out, and I've also read (here - but I forget who posted it) that you can actually lose your supply if you exclusively pump. Perhaps the trick is to taper down on purpose, over time. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
alternatives to 100% breastfeeding
ModernMiko wrote:
"Plissken" wrote in message news:kqZbc.23494$oR5.22717@pd7tw3no... "ModernMiko" wrote in message . .. | I hope I don't get jumped on for this since it's out of the norm but I'll | tell you what I did with DS. I was going through a rough time with some post | partum depression and DS was in the hospital for a week after he was born (I | was sent home after 2 day). What worked and worked very well for me was | pumping and then feeding him that milk with a bottle. It allowed my husband | to get up and feed him some times so I could get some rest and it allowed my | dad to feed him while I was at school. All the while he got the benefits of | breastmilk. We also made sure that he had plenty of cuddling and skin | contact. I pumped for 18 months altogether. First six months, he was fed | exclusively the EBM, and little by little the EBM was cut out from months | 15-18. I used a Medela Pump In Style. As a grad research asst, I was lucky | to have my own office (with a lock) so I pumped a couple of times a day when | I was at school and had an insulated pack with a few cold packs that kept | the milk fresh until I got home. It worked very well for me. I'll probably | try breastfeeding with this baby but its nice to know that I have what I | think is a perfectly reasonable alternative as a back up. Pumping that much | that long took effort sometimes but I'm happy I did it. I wanted to give him | BM if I could. My SIL tried to make me feel bad about not being "pure" | breastfeeder but she tends to be holier-than-thou on a lot of things. | Wow! Good for you for pumping for so long Jenn! I am truly impressed. I had to pump for DD for 4 weeks before she learned to latch on and I know it's not an easy thing to do especially in those early months. Nadene Thanks Nadene. Once I got a system in place, it wasn't too bad although I was ready to give it up by the time I did. Thank you for sharing your story. I need to hear more about what other people have done. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
alternatives to 100% breastfeeding
Vicky Bilaniuk wrote: Clisby wrote: Why would pumping rather than BF allow you to take the drugs sooner? I think I'm missing something here. It's assuming that I would stop sooner, rather than going for, say, a whole year. I read in many other posts that pumping doesn't get as much milk out, and I've also read (here - but I forget who posted it) that you can actually lose your supply if you exclusively pump. Perhaps the trick is to taper down on purpose, over time. Well, you can breastfeed without committing to a year; you could nurse the baby for several months and then taper off, supplementing with formula. I suggest that for 2 reasons: First, you might not dislike breastfeeding or have a hard time with it; and second, I think pumping and bottlefeeding is the hardest way to feed a baby. I pumped for my first child for 2.5 months. I found breastfeeding to be really difficult, but I always regretted not sticking it out with my daughter. I did breastfeed my son (still do). In my experience, BF is not as easy as formula-feeding, but it's a heck of a lot easier than pumping and bottlefeeding. Another factor to consider is that a baby is better than a pump for building up your milk supply. If you try breastfeeding and really dislike it, I would bet you'd have better luck pumping if you had breastfed for 2-3 months first. Clisby |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
alternatives to 100% breastfeeding
Ericka Kammerer wrote:
Vicky Bilaniuk wrote: I'm leaning more and more towards the idea of pumping and bottle feeding (using EBM and formula as needed). Personal reasons, as well as a skin condition that has been haunting me for a long time (was going to see specialists about it and how to deal with it during BFing - will have to go on nasty drugs after baby and breastfeeding are all done), are the driving factors, here. I never wanted to breastfeed, but DH managed to get me to change my mind. However, reading about other peoples' experiences is making me go back to what I originally wanted (probably much to DH's annoyance, but if he complains, I'll tell him to grow breasts and do it himself). If I don't breastfeed and instead pump for the first couple of months, or something, I can go on the drugs sooner rather than later, and with supplementing, hopefully I won't experience some of the things I've read about here regarding breastfeeding a newborn. I don't want to lose my mind. I've lost enough of it already. ;-) Hmm...I'm a little confused. It seems to me you've got two separate issues going on here, and I'm not sure I understand all the interactions. Issue #1 is breastmilk vs. formula. Do I understand correctly that the drugs you wish to take are a problem with breastmilk, such that once you start taking them, whenever that is, you will no longer be able to feed the baby breastmilk? That is correct. Issue #2 (at least for the breastmilk situation) is breast vs. bottle. Does the skin condition affect breastfeeding directly, or is Yes. I have the condition on various parts of my body, including my breasts. It is a very personal issue that I HATE VERY MUCH. I was hoping it would be gone by now, but since I've had the problem for 10 blinking years, I suppose I could not have gotten so lucky. I've tried everything. The drug I can use after birth and/or breastfeeding is basically the drug of last resort (if it doesn't work, then I'm just going to have to live with the problem for the rest of my life). Lots of side effects, apparently. My doc (and heck even the dermatologist I've seen) was reluctant to use it before. I have a hope that it will work, though, because I've used a derivative of it before and it seemed to have an effect. Had to stop because it's a known teratogen. Normally you only take the drug for maybe a month, but I was on it for months and months, so I obviously need something stronger. it just that the drugs you would take for it are problematic in the breastmilk? I guess I'm confused because you say I hate to be confusing but the truth is that I just don't feel comfortable talking to anyone about this, much less a public forum. I didn't give many details because of this. I will talk to the midwife about it in great detail, trust me, but for now I would really like to hear about other peoples' experiences. My dr, of course, already knows everything, but the only suggestion he's been able to make is to see this other doc who has special experience with skin problems on breasts during breastfeeding (although he doesn't know if she has experience with my specific problem, but there's only one way to find out), and of course the drugs later to finally get rid of this idiotic problem. you can take the drugs sooner if you pump than if you breastfeed, but I don't understand how that would be the case. Sorry - I was implying that I would only pump for the first little while, and then stop with the breastmilk altogether. Second, I'm a little confused as to your goal. It sounds like you want to feed *some* breastmilk? What, specifically, do you want to accomplish? Do you just want I don't know! I'm so confused! People keep pulling me in different directions, but no one ever seems to really care about what *I* want. What I think I want is EBM supplemented with formula. I've always said I wanted this. DH of course wants me to do 100% breastfeeding. He could probably join the militants and be an active member. ;-) It's funny - he's normally very sweet and accomodating, but sometimes he gets very stubborn about certain things, and this seems to be one of them. He won't actually say anything when the baby comes - I mean, I *know* I will be able to do whatever works best for the baby and I without him really complaining, but the guilt factor will be there, which I don't want. I keep trying to talk to him about this because I want it cleared up ahead of time (otherwise there will be resentment), but he never wants to agree fully to anything. I don't know - maybe it's just me and I'm totally not understanding him. Maybe he's being is usual accomodating self but I'm expecting something else, subconsciously. Some of the people here have made me feel like I would be horribly bad if I didn't 100% breastfeed, so that's probably "feeding" this problem. to give breastmilk as long as it's easy? Or is there a period of time that you want to be able to give breastmilk? I want to be able to give breastmilk at first because I really do believe that it will probably help build up the child's immune system, and possibly other things too. I don't know how long would be useful, though. Daye did 6 weeks. Is that a good period of time? I realize that people all have differing opinions on this, though. I also realize that the very political organization called the WHO advocates 2 years. I don't believe anything the WHO says, though (I find them to be very untrustworthy). Or what? I'm thinking that how you'd want to approach this would depend on precisely what your goals are. For instance, if you want to, say, be able to take the drugs by, oh, three months postpartum, then probably the easiest thing to do is ditch the idea of pumping, breastfeed, introduce a bottle of formula fairly early (because you obviously won't have a fit if nipple confusion results, but you'd be in trouble if the baby refused a bottle), and see how long your supply holds up and how long you want to wait to take the drugs. This sounds like an interesting idea. Thank you. Anyway, I guess I don't understand how pumping and feeding EBM in a bottle helps you out? Pumping just It keeps the baby away from the skin problem. That said, though, I don't even know if pumping would be safe. I guess I'll have to wait and see. I'm on a pregnancy-safe drug at the moment that seems to at least be keeping the problem with the breasts under control (having no effect elsewhere, though, and unfortunately the problem elsewhere is getting worse), but it's not *gone*, so I'm just going to have to play the wait and see game. I don't want the baby to come into contact with the affected areas (I have my reasons). really seems the hard way to go about this, because it takes longer to pump than to nurse in the first place, and even when you're done, you still haven't fed the baby! Everyone is different, but in my case, it takes about 10 minutes, max, to nurse, but it takes a good 20 minutes to pump enough for a feeding, and then around 15 minutes to feed that much to the baby in a bottle. So when I think of ease, 10 minutes sounds waaaaaay better to me than 35+ minutes to accomplish the same thing, and that's before I've washed out the pump and the bottles. I think in your situation, I'd be far more tempted to nurse and feed formula in a bottle, given that the drugs will eventually make EBM not an option anyway? You may compromise your supply by supplementing, but that doesn't seem like it would be the end of the world to you, and you'd get much more of a break supplementing with formula than trying to pump and feed all the time. Or am I missing something here? (That's not to say I don't admire women who pump and feed EBM exclusively, for whatever reason. It just doesn't sound like you're particularly hell bent on avoiding formula and that you'd need to be on formula full time by the time you start taking the drugs, so I'm not sure I see the problem with introducing formula for the bottle feedings rather than EBM.) My other issue is time. I'm simply not heroic enough to breastfeed for 45 minutes out of every hour. How can one stay awake for that long???!!! Do people go to bed? When someone says "every 1 to 2 hours" I immediately wonder where sleeping time enters in. I would die of exhaustion if I couldn't go to sleep. Everyone would. I cannot pull all-nighters. I realize that some people deal with this problem by co-sleeping, but even if I did that, I know I would stay awake - that's just *me*. This is the type of stuff that turns me off of 100% breastfeeding (but not off of breastfeeding completely, mind you - I think I failed to make that distinction before - sorry). Wouldn't supplementing with formula make everyone's life a little easier during those periods where the baby wants to eat constantly? I had reservations about 100% breastfeeding right from the start, but I was willing to do it anyway. I guess the fact that my horrifyingly idiotic skin problem simply isn't going away is just adding to the problem, making me now more reluctant (and add the DH factor and I guess I've got three issues going on, here). I just don't know what to do. It's all very depressing. I'm really peed off about the skin problem. It hit me only last week that it wasn't going to be gone by the time I give birth. I feel like such an idiot. I can't believe I actually thought it would be gone, all of a sudden, when I've been fighting it for 10 years. I was obviously too focussed on simply getting the baby in the first place. Anyway, I'm not making any firm decisions right now. I just need more info to help me later, although I think I'll need to at least decide what pump to get. If I want a PIS, for e.g., I will have to either order it or go hunting around in Toronto, since I've never seen anything other than the Isis pumps in the stores in my city. There is one final thing that I will add, and only to help make it more obvious to people why I refuse to let the baby come into contact with the affected areas. It's contagious. It only seems to affect people with weaker than normal immune systems, though (so DH has no problems with it and has no qualms about touching me, and the "weaker than normal immune system" thing definitely describes me perfectly). I imagine that a newborn would be at greater risk than, say, my DH, though. I will not allow my baby to get this, and I don't care what other people think (I'm thinking particularly of those who *know* about the problem and who still expect me to breastfeed). I think I'm going on and on far too much about this. I'm driving myself nuts. I think I need to wait and talk to the midwife and most likely that other doctor. OK, that's it from me. :-) I've said far too much. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Breastfeeding and picking your nose and eating it... | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 5 | March 29th 04 08:03 AM |
MDs causing breast cancer? (also: Breastfeeding 'kickers') | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 0 | January 29th 04 05:38 AM |
Breastfeeding May Reduce Mom's | Larry McMahan | Pregnancy | 0 | December 5th 03 02:45 AM |
Vaccination is NOT immunization/Breastfeeding *is* immunization! | Todd Gastaldo | Pregnancy | 30 | October 6th 03 09:16 PM |