Check 'Alina's' IP address yourself.

I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail
without an ISP, Doan.

I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned.

Trying to divert with ad hom?

Usual tactics for you, liar.

Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID!

Doan

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail
without an ISP, Doan.

I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned.

Trying to divert with ad hom?

Usual tactics for you, liar.

Doan wrote:
Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID!

Claim?

No, it's my speculation that I share with others.

I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though.

The kind of thing a sock would do.

A sock with a good working knowledge of how to hide their real identity.

Smile, you're on candid Usenet.


Doan

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail
without an ISP, Doan.

I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned.

Trying to divert with ad hom?

Usual tactics for you, liar.

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID!

Claim?

No, it's my speculation that I share with others.

Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim?

I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though.

What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi!

The kind of thing a sock would do.

A sock with a good working knowledge of how to hide their real identity.

Smile, you're on candid Usenet.


Doan

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail
without an ISP, Doan.

I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned.

Trying to divert with ad hom?

Usual tactics for you, liar.

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID!
Claim?

No, it's my speculation that I share with others.

Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim?

I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though.

What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi!

The empty block of fields identifying a poster's IP provider from the
magnitude survey service for e-mail, Doan.

You know, where everyone else you insisted I run had their ISP listed,
but Alina's IP number didn't produce anything but blanks....and YOU hid
that section in each and every post about it.

That one.

When you run my IP number, any of them...dynamics...you get this:


Other information about this IP address
Sender Category
Network Owner Gorge Networks
Domain gorge.net
Date of first message seen from this address 2007-01-28
CIDR range 209.216.160.0/19
# of domains controlled by this network owner 62
Geography data
Country US
State OR
City Hood River
Postal code 97031

When you run Alina's, no matter how many times you run it, for the same
information block you get:

Other information about this IP address
Sender Category unknown
Network Owner unknown
Domain unknown
Date of first message seen from this address
CIDR range unknown
# of domains controlled by this network owner 0
Geography data
Country unknown
State unknown
City unknown
Postal code unknown

No, Doan, not the right hand block...everyone but a Spammer or very
heavy e-mail server pulls a blank there.

The left hand lower block that you keep hiding by NOT producing when you
are looking directly at the page it's on.

As I said,
I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail
without an ISP, Doan.

But you sure can continue to lie to dodge....R R R RRRR R R R






The kind of thing a sock would do.

A sock with a good working knowledge of how to hide their real identity.

Smile, you're on candid Usenet.

Doan

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail
without an ISP, Doan.

I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned.

Trying to divert with ad hom?

Usual tactics for you, liar.

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID!
Claim?

No, it's my speculation that I share with others.

Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim?

Your word. "Claim."

I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though.

What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi!

The one I showed you many times now...the one where YOU hide the block
with the missing info, and even the block for the rest of us when our IP
is run that does NOT lack the info Alina's does.

Yer just a little liar.

Think you are cute, don't you, child.

You apparently didn't get spanked enough.

R RRRRR R R RR




The kind of thing a sock would do.

A sock with a good working knowledge of how to hide their real identity.

Smile, you're on candid Usenet.

Doan

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail
without an ISP, Doan.

I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned.

Trying to divert with ad hom?

Usual tactics for you, liar.

0:- wrote:

Where's your explanation for why all of us show an ISP who supplied our
real IP numbers, and NONE where Alina's IP number is run, which of
course means a fictitious IP number was issued for that account by an
anonymizing service.

Who did you subscribe with, Doan?

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID!
Claim?

No, it's my speculation that I share with others.

Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim?

I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though.

What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi!

The empty block of fields identifying a poster's IP provider from the
magnitude survey service for e-mail, Doan.

Then you are IGNORANTLY STUPID!

Here is a hint:

"ALL DATA IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND IRONPORT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS,
IMPLIED OR STATUTORY INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF
ACCURACY..."

YOU ARE STUPID!!! Hihihi!

Doan

You know, where everyone else you insisted I run had their ISP listed,
but Alina's IP number didn't produce anything but blanks....and YOU hid
that section in each and every post about it.

That one.

When you run my IP number, any of them...dynamics...you get this:


Other information about this IP address
Sender Category
Network Owner Gorge Networks
Domain gorge.net
Date of first message seen from this address 2007-01-28
CIDR range 209.216.160.0/19
# of domains controlled by this network owner 62
Geography data
Country US
State OR
City Hood River
Postal code 97031

When you run Alina's, no matter how many times you run it, for the same
information block you get:

Other information about this IP address
Sender Category unknown
Network Owner unknown
Domain unknown
Date of first message seen from this address
CIDR range unknown
# of domains controlled by this network owner 0
Geography data
Country unknown
State unknown
City unknown
Postal code unknown

No, Doan, not the right hand block...everyone but a Spammer or very
heavy e-mail server pulls a blank there.

The left hand lower block that you keep hiding by NOT producing when you
are looking directly at the page it's on.

As I said,
I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail
without an ISP, Doan.

But you sure can continue to lie to dodge....R R R RRRR R R R






The kind of thing a sock would do.

A sock with a good working knowledge of how to hide their real identity.

Smile, you're on candid Usenet.

Doan

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail
without an ISP, Doan.

I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned.

Trying to divert with ad hom?

Usual tactics for you, liar.

Hihihi! Kane still EXPOSING his STUPIDITY.

Doan

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote:

0:- wrote:

Where's your explanation for why all of us show an ISP who supplied our
real IP numbers, and NONE where Alina's IP number is run, which of
course means a fictitious IP number was issued for that account by an
anonymizing service.

Who did you subscribe with, Doan?

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:- wrote:

Doan wrote:
Hihih! Alina is me is your claim, STUPID!
Claim?

No, it's my speculation that I share with others.

Hahaha! So now it's no longer your claim?

I see you can't answer the question about Alina's missing ISP though.

What missing ISP? You are exposing your STUPIDITY again. Hihihi!
The empty block of fields identifying a poster's IP provider from the
magnitude survey service for e-mail, Doan.

Then you are IGNORANTLY STUPID!

I would be if I bought that dodge. I asked you to explain, if you could
(you can always say, "I don't know"...but your ego is bound up in this
pretty tightly....rrr r r r r ) why no one but Alina lacks data in the
lower left block...the one that gives ALL of us, Me, Ron, Betty, and ISP
who assigned our IP number.

Still can't do anything but dodge, I see.

Here is a hint:

Hints aren't explanations, Doan. For you it's just another dodge. Like
always. R R R R R R RR R RR

"ALL DATA IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND IRONPORT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS,
IMPLIED OR STATUTORY INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION ANY IMPLIED WARRANTY OF
ACCURACY..."

That explains how IP run but Alina's produces an ISP provider of and IP
number?

Sure Doan.

Somehow it was right on us but wrong on Alina...yeah, that's it. They
are picking on Alina. R RRRRRR

YOU ARE STUPID!!! Hihihi!

Well, I most certainly would be if I bought that latest dodge. Hohoho!

I asked you to explain.

Can you, or will you try yet another dodge?

Want to guess what my money is on?

Look again below and answer the actual question, or admit you cannot.

And no matter how many times her number is run, and others are run, the
results are the same, even over a span of days.

Explain please. 0:-]


Doan

You know, where everyone else you insisted I run had their ISP listed,
but Alina's IP number didn't produce anything but blanks....and YOU hid
that section in each and every post about it.

That one.

When you run my IP number, any of them...dynamics...you get this:


Other information about this IP address
Sender Category
Network Owner Gorge Networks
Domain gorge.net
Date of first message seen from this address 2007-01-28
CIDR range 209.216.160.0/19
# of domains controlled by this network owner 62
Geography data
Country US
State OR
City Hood River
Postal code 97031

When you run Alina's, no matter how many times you run it, for the same
information block you get:

Other information about this IP address
Sender Category unknown
Network Owner unknown
Domain unknown
Date of first message seen from this address
CIDR range unknown
# of domains controlled by this network owner 0
Geography data
Country unknown
State unknown
City unknown
Postal code unknown

No, Doan, not the right hand block...everyone but a Spammer or very
heavy e-mail server pulls a blank there.

The left hand lower block that you keep hiding by NOT producing when you
are looking directly at the page it's on.

As I said,
I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail
without an ISP, Doan.

But you sure can continue to lie to dodge....R R R RRRR R R R





The kind of thing a sock would do.

A sock with a good working knowledge of how to hide their real identity.

Smile, you're on candid Usenet.

Doan

On Thu, 1 Mar 2007, 0:-] wrote:

I see you can't answer the questions about Alina's posting e-mail
without an ISP, Doan.

I doubt even the Internet duffer would let that slip by unquestioned.

Trying to divert with ad hom?

Usual tactics for you, liar.