If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
North Central Texas Corporation not remitting garnished...
child support payments in a timely manner in accordance with Texas state
law. If mailed they are supposed to be remitted and postal stamped the same day they are garnished, if electronically remitted they are to be sent the second business day. In this instance the corporation not the parent is the deadbeat. I eventually get them, however they are always a week or more late. I'm fairly sure they are holding them in a savings account for a week or more collecting interest then when they garnish another payment they start the process of remitting the previous payment. Given the number of divorced people working there and the thousands of dollars quite likely being played with by them that isn't theirs to play with they are quite likely making a good chunk of change in interest. The Texas Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division refuses to do anything about this as I guess they have bigger fish to fry. I'm thinking of placing an ad in the local paper requesting if any other custodial parents of those working there would be interested in joining me in a class action lawsuit against the company and the firm they have doing payroll. Has anyone here any experience with this sort of thing, information to impart, know any lawyers who specialize in making tons of money off of deadbeat corporations etc. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
North Central Texas Corporation not remitting garnished...
"Muddle" wrote in message ... child support payments in a timely manner in accordance with Texas state law. If mailed they are supposed to be remitted and postal stamped the same day they are garnished, if electronically remitted they are to be sent the second business day. In this instance the corporation not the parent is the deadbeat. I eventually get them, however they are always a week or more late. I'm fairly sure they are holding them in a savings account for a week or more collecting interest then when they garnish another payment they start the process of remitting the previous payment. Given the number of divorced people working there and the thousands of dollars quite likely being played with by them that isn't theirs to play with they are quite likely making a good chunk of change in interest. The Texas Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division refuses to do anything about this as I guess they have bigger fish to fry. I'm thinking of placing an ad in the local paper requesting if any other custodial parents of those working there would be interested in joining me in a class action lawsuit against the company and the firm they have doing payroll. Has anyone here any experience with this sort of thing, information to impart, know any lawyers who specialize in making tons of money off of deadbeat corporations etc. Perhaps you can cite the Texas law that says CS garnishments must be remitted to CP's as you suggested. If that law exists it is not going to be invalid because it runs contrary to federal CS garnishment laws. It is my impression you are trying to apply state CS accounting unit disbursement law to employers which come under a different federal CS remittance law. Employers have 7 business days to forward CS payments to the state. The state then has 2 business days after receipt of the payments to forward the CS to the CP. Considering mail time of about 4 days, and at least 6 weekend days, there could be 7+2+4+6 or 19 calendar days between a garnishment and when the CP gets the money. Since your "complaint" is the garnishments are taking a week or more to reach you, a proper perspective is to recognize you are getting the CS 10-12 days faster than the federal law requires. BTW - If you have enough money to mount such a frivolous lawsuit, you should have your CS reduced based on your lack of need for the CS money. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
North Central Texas Corporation not remitting garnished...
"Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ... "Muddle" wrote in message ... child support payments in a timely manner in accordance with Texas state law. If mailed they are supposed to be remitted and postal stamped the same day they are garnished, if electronically remitted they are to be sent the second business day. In this instance the corporation not the parent is the deadbeat. I eventually get them, however they are always a week or more late. I'm fairly sure they are holding them in a savings account for a week or more collecting interest then when they garnish another payment they start the process of remitting the previous payment. Given the number of divorced people working there and the thousands of dollars quite likely being played with by them that isn't theirs to play with they are quite likely making a good chunk of change in interest. The Texas Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division refuses to do anything about this as I guess they have bigger fish to fry. I'm thinking of placing an ad in the local paper requesting if any other custodial parents of those working there would be interested in joining me in a class action lawsuit against the company and the firm they have doing payroll. Has anyone here any experience with this sort of thing, information to impart, know any lawyers who specialize in making tons of money off of deadbeat corporations etc. Perhaps you can cite the Texas law that says CS garnishments must be remitted to CP's as you suggested. If that law exists it is not going to be invalid because it runs contrary to federal CS garnishment laws. It is my impression you are trying to apply state CS accounting unit disbursement law to employers which come under a different federal CS remittance law. Employers have 7 business days to forward CS payments to the state. The state then has 2 business days after receipt of the payments to forward the CS to the CP. Considering mail time of about 4 days, and at least 6 weekend days, there could be 7+2+4+6 or 19 calendar days between a garnishment and when the CP gets the money. Since your "complaint" is the garnishments are taking a week or more to reach you, a proper perspective is to recognize you are getting the CS 10-12 days faster than the federal law requires. BTW - If you have enough money to mount such a frivolous lawsuit, you should have your CS reduced based on your lack of need for the CS money. Hence the class action to spread the cost around and I also intend to seek payment of all legal fees. I've already discussed this with TOAG Child Support Division. They have stated the firm is subject to Texas state law and are not remitting the support payments in accordance with the laws of the state, although they were up until three months ago when at that time they hired a different accounting firm to do their payroll. I figure payroll was outsourced to some firm in India and the payments are being mailed by tramp steamer around the horn of Africa. They don't seem to have the manpower to bother with enforcing it as they're busy with all the other real dead beats, not the ones who are actually paying each week yet don't see their payments getting to their children. I'm supposed to get a child support payment weekly and I am not, although when I bitch about it they can get all the back payments direct deposited to my account that very same week. This is a dead beat corporation that is garnishing your paychecks and not sending the money to your children. Not only that, but one or more of you is now out of work and are having difficulty paying your child support for the very same reason. I should think you'd be as outraged as I am. Perhaps I need to find a custodial parent forum somewhere on the web. I'm out of here. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
North Central Texas Corporation not remitting garnished...
"Muddle" wrote in message news "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ... "Muddle" wrote in message ... child support payments in a timely manner in accordance with Texas state law. If mailed they are supposed to be remitted and postal stamped the same day they are garnished, if electronically remitted they are to be sent the second business day. In this instance the corporation not the parent is the deadbeat. I eventually get them, however they are always a week or more late. I'm fairly sure they are holding them in a savings account for a week or more collecting interest then when they garnish another payment they start the process of remitting the previous payment. Given the number of divorced people working there and the thousands of dollars quite likely being played with by them that isn't theirs to play with they are quite likely making a good chunk of change in interest. The Texas Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division refuses to do anything about this as I guess they have bigger fish to fry. I'm thinking of placing an ad in the local paper requesting if any other custodial parents of those working there would be interested in joining me in a class action lawsuit against the company and the firm they have doing payroll. Has anyone here any experience with this sort of thing, information to impart, know any lawyers who specialize in making tons of money off of deadbeat corporations etc. Perhaps you can cite the Texas law that says CS garnishments must be remitted to CP's as you suggested. If that law exists it is not going to be invalid because it runs contrary to federal CS garnishment laws. It is my impression you are trying to apply state CS accounting unit disbursement law to employers which come under a different federal CS remittance law. Employers have 7 business days to forward CS payments to the state. The state then has 2 business days after receipt of the payments to forward the CS to the CP. Considering mail time of about 4 days, and at least 6 weekend days, there could be 7+2+4+6 or 19 calendar days between a garnishment and when the CP gets the money. Since your "complaint" is the garnishments are taking a week or more to reach you, a proper perspective is to recognize you are getting the CS 10-12 days faster than the federal law requires. BTW - If you have enough money to mount such a frivolous lawsuit, you should have your CS reduced based on your lack of need for the CS money. Hence the class action to spread the cost around and I also intend to seek payment of all legal fees. I've already discussed this with TOAG Child Support Division. They have stated the firm is subject to Texas state law and are not remitting the support payments in accordance with the laws of the state, although they were up until three months ago when at that time they hired a different accounting firm to do their payroll. I figure payroll was outsourced to some firm in India and the payments are being mailed by tramp steamer around the horn of Africa. They don't seem to have the manpower to bother with enforcing it as they're busy with all the other real dead beats, not the ones who are actually paying each week yet don't see their payments getting to their children. I'm supposed to get a child support payment weekly and I am not, although when I bitch about it they can get all the back payments direct deposited to my account that very same week. This is a dead beat corporation that is garnishing your paychecks and not sending the money to your children. Not only that, but one or more of you is now out of work and are having difficulty paying your child support for the very same reason. I should think you'd be as outraged as I am. Perhaps I need to find a custodial parent forum somewhere on the web. I'm out of here. Why don't you talk to your ex and explain the difficulty to him. Then the 2 of you can go to court and do away with the wage garnishment, and he can send you a check out of every paycheck instead. That might be easier than a lawsuit. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
North Central Texas Corporation not remitting garnished...
"Muddle" wrote in message news "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ... "Muddle" wrote in message ... child support payments in a timely manner in accordance with Texas state law. If mailed they are supposed to be remitted and postal stamped the same day they are garnished, if electronically remitted they are to be sent the second business day. In this instance the corporation not the parent is the deadbeat. I eventually get them, however they are always a week or more late. I'm fairly sure they are holding them in a savings account for a week or more collecting interest then when they garnish another payment they start the process of remitting the previous payment. Given the number of divorced people working there and the thousands of dollars quite likely being played with by them that isn't theirs to play with they are quite likely making a good chunk of change in interest. The Texas Office of the Attorney General Child Support Division refuses to do anything about this as I guess they have bigger fish to fry. I'm thinking of placing an ad in the local paper requesting if any other custodial parents of those working there would be interested in joining me in a class action lawsuit against the company and the firm they have doing payroll. Has anyone here any experience with this sort of thing, information to impart, know any lawyers who specialize in making tons of money off of deadbeat corporations etc. Perhaps you can cite the Texas law that says CS garnishments must be remitted to CP's as you suggested. If that law exists it is not going to be invalid because it runs contrary to federal CS garnishment laws. It is my impression you are trying to apply state CS accounting unit disbursement law to employers which come under a different federal CS remittance law. Employers have 7 business days to forward CS payments to the state. The state then has 2 business days after receipt of the payments to forward the CS to the CP. Considering mail time of about 4 days, and at least 6 weekend days, there could be 7+2+4+6 or 19 calendar days between a garnishment and when the CP gets the money. Since your "complaint" is the garnishments are taking a week or more to reach you, a proper perspective is to recognize you are getting the CS 10-12 days faster than the federal law requires. BTW - If you have enough money to mount such a frivolous lawsuit, you should have your CS reduced based on your lack of need for the CS money. Hence the class action to spread the cost around and I also intend to seek payment of all legal fees. I've already discussed this with TOAG Child Support Division. They have stated the firm is subject to Texas state law and are not remitting the support payments in accordance with the laws of the state, although they were up until three months ago when at that time they hired a different accounting firm to do their payroll. I figure payroll was outsourced to some firm in India and the payments are being mailed by tramp steamer around the horn of Africa. They don't seem to have the manpower to bother with enforcing it as they're busy with all the other real dead beats, not the ones who are actually paying each week yet don't see their payments getting to their children. I'm supposed to get a child support payment weekly and I am not, although when I bitch about it they can get all the back payments direct deposited to my account that very same week. This is a dead beat corporation that is garnishing your paychecks and not sending the money to your children. Not only that, but one or more of you is now out of work and are having difficulty paying your child support for the very same reason. I should think you'd be as outraged as I am. Perhaps I need to find a custodial parent forum somewhere on the web. I'm out of here. Do you have a cite for your contention CS garnishments that are mailed have to be "remitted and postal stamped the same day they are garnished"? The only reference I can find is Section 158.203 of the Texas Family Code regarding Remitting Withheld Payments. That section is silent regarding mailed CS garnishment payments other than to say, in general terms, withheld payments need to be sent to one of several local office types. The electronic funds transfer within 2 days requirement that you cited is included in this section. BTW - A search of the Texas corporation license database on "North Central Texas Corporation" turned up no matches. If you plan to sue them, you need to get a better name to identify the company. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
North Central Texas Corporation not remitting garnished...
"teachrmama" wrote in Why don't you talk to your ex and explain the difficulty to him. Then the 2 of you can go to court and do away with the wage garnishment, and he can send you a check out of every paycheck instead. That might be easier than a lawsuit. She obviously needs money every week to feed her habit! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
AUSTIN — Texas: Reports detail abuse at Texas facilities,Records show mentally retarded children and adults were pushed, hit, kicked by staffers... | fx | Spanking | 0 | July 25th 07 05:48 AM |
AUSTIN — Texas: Reports detail abuse at Texas facilities,Records show mentally retarded children and adults were pushed, hit, kicked by staffers... | fx | Foster Parents | 0 | July 25th 07 05:48 AM |
CS and garnished wages | Jaguar | Child Support | 17 | January 4th 07 06:48 AM |
Foster families urgently needed in North Central W.Va. | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 2 | September 11th 04 08:12 PM |
Medication cut causes concern Some are taken aback after the North Broward Hospital District says it can no longer afford to provide drugs for poor people with mental illnesses.Medication cut causes concern Some are taken aback after the North Browar | wexwimpy | Foster Parents | 0 | February 6th 04 05:39 PM |