If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Notice the Doan....
.....couldn't deal with the issues I brought up and simply went back to
attacking? Insults. Name calling. Denial of the obvious even to the point of what was or was not in my posts. You have to wonder if he isn't hysterically blind, or obsessively attached to power struggles. I've seen him claim a statement from a study said something that it patently did not, then when asked to explain, claim the poster was "stupid" for "not seeing it." Sometimes it's funny, and sometimes it's pathetic....but when he's cornered, like now, you can count on him to NOT even try to answer the challenges. That's why I call him a coward. And that is what a great many spanked children become, cowardly attackers. Fortunately many escape. I suspect because there were some people in their lives that either sheltered them, or their spanking parent turned honest and stopped the spanking. Poor Doan. This dodging of his has become downright pitiful. 0:- |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Notice the Doan....
Hypocrite! Doan On 22 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote: ....couldn't deal with the issues I brought up and simply went back to attacking? Insults. Name calling. Denial of the obvious even to the point of what was or was not in my posts. You have to wonder if he isn't hysterically blind, or obsessively attached to power struggles. I've seen him claim a statement from a study said something that it patently did not, then when asked to explain, claim the poster was "stupid" for "not seeing it." Sometimes it's funny, and sometimes it's pathetic....but when he's cornered, like now, you can count on him to NOT even try to answer the challenges. That's why I call him a coward. And that is what a great many spanked children become, cowardly attackers. Fortunately many escape. I suspect because there were some people in their lives that either sheltered them, or their spanking parent turned honest and stopped the spanking. Poor Doan. This dodging of his has become downright pitiful. 0:- |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Notice the Doan....
Doan wrote: Hypocrite! Doan....couldn't deal with the issues I brought up and simply went back to attacking? Insults. Name calling. Denial of the obvious even to the point of what was or was not in my posts. You have to wonder if he isn't hysterically blind, or obsessively attached to power struggles. I've seen him claim a statement from a study said something that it patently did not, then when asked to explain, claim the poster was "stupid" for "not seeing it." Sometimes it's funny, and sometimes it's pathetic....but when he's cornered, like now, you can count on him to NOT even try to answer the challenges. That's why I call him a coward. And that is what a great many spanked children become, cowardly attackers. .. Like I said before, just resorting to name calling again. 0:- |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Notice the Doan....
LOL! A typical "never-spanked" boy? Doan On 23 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hypocrite! Doan....couldn't deal with the issues I brought up and simply went back to attacking? Insults. Name calling. Denial of the obvious even to the point of what was or was not in my posts. You have to wonder if he isn't hysterically blind, or obsessively attached to power struggles. I've seen him claim a statement from a study said something that it patently did not, then when asked to explain, claim the poster was "stupid" for "not seeing it." Sometimes it's funny, and sometimes it's pathetic....but when he's cornered, like now, you can count on him to NOT even try to answer the challenges. That's why I call him a coward. And that is what a great many spanked children become, cowardly attackers. .. Like I said before, just resorting to name calling again. 0:- |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Notice the Doan....
On 23 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: Hypocrite! Doan....couldn't deal with the issues I brought up and simply went back to attacking? Insults. Name calling. Denial of the obvious even to the point of what was or was not in my posts. Hypocrite! ;-) Doan |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Notice the Doan....
On 23 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: Hypocrite! Doan....couldn't deal with the issues I brought up and simply went back to attacking? Insults. Name calling. Denial of the obvious even to the point of what was or was not in my posts. You have to wonder if he isn't hysterically blind, or obsessively attached to power struggles. I've seen him claim a statement from a study said something that it patently did not, then when asked to explain, claim the poster was "stupid" for "not seeing it." You meant like claiming that there is no punishment used in the Embry Study? Shall we revisit that? ;-) Perhaps this time you can provide "becca" a copy. LOL! Doan |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Notice the Doan....
Doan wrote: On 23 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hypocrite! Doan....couldn't deal with the issues I brought up and simply went back to attacking? Insults. Name calling. Denial of the obvious even to the point of what was or was not in my posts. You have to wonder if he isn't hysterically blind, or obsessively attached to power struggles. I've seen him claim a statement from a study said something that it patently did not, then when asked to explain, claim the poster was "stupid" for "not seeing it." You meant like claiming that there is no punishment used in the Embry Study? Shall we revisit that? ;-) Perhaps this time you can provide "becca" a copy. LOL! Changing the subject again? And no, I didn't claim there was no punishment. I claimed there was none by my definition. You disgreed. It was nothing more than have a child sit and think about what he had done and what the right thing to do would be. You don't have the study and you are lying about it. You read and excerpt from some quote. Having access to a university library allows that. I know you don't have a study because Dr. Embry and I discussed who he has given it to. It's not published. My own copy is an 8x11 set he copied from his paper files for me. No one but I have asked for a copy in years. And he had not distributed them. They were for a private survey he conducted, Hence, Doan, while no one can be sure, I KNOW you are a liar. Embry knows every person he gave that study to. He doesn't know you. Call him and introduce yourself. Ask for the study, but be sure to mention your activities here. I believe I pointed out the ng to him when I spoke to him last. Doan But thanks for the obvious repeated attempt to dodge, Aline. 0:- |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Notice the Doan....
On 23 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On 23 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hypocrite! Doan....couldn't deal with the issues I brought up and simply went back to attacking? Insults. Name calling. Denial of the obvious even to the point of what was or was not in my posts. You have to wonder if he isn't hysterically blind, or obsessively attached to power struggles. I've seen him claim a statement from a study said something that it patently did not, then when asked to explain, claim the poster was "stupid" for "not seeing it." You meant like claiming that there is no punishment used in the Embry Study? Shall we revisit that? ;-) Perhaps this time you can provide "becca" a copy. LOL! Changing the subject again? To you misleading (or is it lying?) about a study? ;-) And no, I didn't claim there was no punishment. I claimed there was none by my definition. You disgreed. It was nothing more than have a child sit and think about what he had done and what the right thing to do would be. So Dr. Embry used the word "punishment" in his study and you defined it "no punishment". God! You are smarter than Dr. Embry. You don't have the study and you are lying about it. You read and excerpt from some quote. Having access to a university library allows that. I know you don't have a study because Dr. Embry and I discussed who he has given it to. It's not published. My own copy is an 8x11 set he copied from his paper files for me. Oops! The last time you said it's a PDF file. Want me to look in the "archives" for you? ;-) No one but I have asked for a copy in years. And he had not distributed them. They were for a private survey he conducted, LOL! I can easily prove that you are LYING! But I will save it for "becca". Hence, Doan, while no one can be sure, I KNOW you are a liar. Embry knows every person he gave that study to. That's is funny! He doesn't know you. Call him and introduce yourself. And I don't know him! ;-) I just know his study. Ask for the study, but be sure to mention your activities here. I believe I pointed out the ng to him when I spoke to him last. Perhaps you can have him vouch for you. Shall I forward this to his email address? You know his email address, don't you? ;-) Doan Doan But thanks for the obvious repeated attempt to dodge, Aline. Sure, Ignoranus Kane0. I'll you Dr. Embry will have a laugh when he read this. ;-) Doan |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Notice the Doan....
Doan wrote: On 23 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On 23 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hypocrite! Doan....couldn't deal with the issues I brought up and simply went back to attacking? Insults. Name calling. Denial of the obvious even to the point of what was or was not in my posts. You have to wonder if he isn't hysterically blind, or obsessively attached to power struggles. I've seen him claim a statement from a study said something that it patently did not, then when asked to explain, claim the poster was "stupid" for "not seeing it." You meant like claiming that there is no punishment used in the Embry Study? Shall we revisit that? ;-) Perhaps this time you can provide "becca" a copy. LOL! Changing the subject again? To you misleading (or is it lying?) about a study? ;-) And no, I didn't claim there was no punishment. I claimed there was none by my definition. You disgreed. It was nothing more than have a child sit and think about what he had done and what the right thing to do would be. So Dr. Embry used the word "punishment" in his study and you defined it "no punishment". God! You are smarter than Dr. Embry. Yes, He's not God. Nor are you. I disagree that it was punishment. We had this discussion before, and now you need to rehash it to avoid your lies and duplicity. I may be smarter than him. I couldn't say. It's nor relevant. One can be smart or dumb. The question is what are the facts. Not who's smarter. You don't have the study and you are lying about it. You read and excerpt from some quote. Having access to a university library allows that. I know you don't have a study because Dr. Embry and I discussed who he has given it to. It's not published. My own copy is an 8x11 set he copied from his paper files for me. Oops! The last time you said it's a PDF file. Want me to look in the "archives" for you? ;-) Sure. But so what. It can't be put into a PDF file format? PDF renders graphically, as you well know as well as character. No one but I have asked for a copy in years. And he had not distributed them. They were for a private survey he conducted, LOL! I can easily prove that you are LYING! But I will save it for "becca". Good. Do so. I may be mistaken. Why would you call a mistake a lie? That is YOUR constant lie throughout your posting history here. You and someone else disagree, but you call it a lie. They could be mistaken. But for you it's still a lie. Is it a lie when YOU make a mistake, or have the wrong information? Or are you perfect? Hence, Doan, while no one can be sure, I KNOW you are a liar. Embry knows every person he gave that study to. That's is funny! No, it's not the least funny. He doesn't know you. Call him and introduce yourself. And I don't know him! ;-) I just know his study. You don't know the one I have. And you refused to prove you had it. Ask for the study, but be sure to mention your activities here. I believe I pointed out the ng to him when I spoke to him last. Perhaps you can have him vouch for you. Shall I forward this to his email address? You know his email address, don't you? ;-) Yep. Send it to him. I'd love to see him come here and deal with you. Doan Doan But thanks for the obvious repeated attempt to dodge, Aline. Sure, Ignoranus Kane0. I'll you Dr. Embry will have a laugh when he read this. ;-) Send it. Doan Kane |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Notice the Doan....
On 23 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote:
Doan wrote: On 23 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: On 23 Jan 2006, 0:- wrote: Doan wrote: Hypocrite! Doan....couldn't deal with the issues I brought up and simply went back to attacking? Insults. Name calling. Denial of the obvious even to the point of what was or was not in my posts. You have to wonder if he isn't hysterically blind, or obsessively attached to power struggles. I've seen him claim a statement from a study said something that it patently did not, then when asked to explain, claim the poster was "stupid" for "not seeing it." You meant like claiming that there is no punishment used in the Embry Study? Shall we revisit that? ;-) Perhaps this time you can provide "becca" a copy. LOL! Changing the subject again? To you misleading (or is it lying?) about a study? ;-) And no, I didn't claim there was no punishment. I claimed there was none by my definition. You disgreed. It was nothing more than have a child sit and think about what he had done and what the right thing to do would be. So Dr. Embry used the word "punishment" in his study and you defined it "no punishment". God! You are smarter than Dr. Embry. Yes, He's not God. Nor are you. I disagree that it was punishment. We had this discussion before, and now you need to rehash it to avoid your lies and duplicity. I may be smarter than him. I couldn't say. It's nor relevant. One can be smart or dumb. The question is what are the facts. Not who's smarter. And the fact is Dr. Embry used the word "punishment"! He had a PH.D in the field. And you are what? Professor Kane0? ;-) You don't have the study and you are lying about it. You read and excerpt from some quote. Having access to a university library allows that. I know you don't have a study because Dr. Embry and I discussed who he has given it to. It's not published. My own copy is an 8x11 set he copied from his paper files for me. Oops! The last time you said it's a PDF file. Want me to look in the "archives" for you? ;-) Sure. But so what. It can't be put into a PDF file format? PDF renders graphically, as you well know as well as character. It can but it showed that you can't even keep you LIES straight! ;-) No one but I have asked for a copy in years. And he had not distributed them. They were for a private survey he conducted, LOL! I can easily prove that you are LYING! But I will save it for "becca". Good. Do so. I may be mistaken. Why would you call a mistake a lie? That is YOUR constant lie throughout your posting history here. You and someone else disagree, but you call it a lie. They could be mistaken. But for you it's still a lie. So now, it's a mistake? ;-) Is it a lie when YOU make a mistake, or have the wrong information? Or are you perfect? It's a lie when it's contrary to the facts presented. YOU ARE LYING! Hence, Doan, while no one can be sure, I KNOW you are a liar. Embry knows every person he gave that study to. That's is funny! No, it's not the least funny. It's is to me. ;-) He doesn't know you. Call him and introduce yourself. And I don't know him! ;-) I just know his study. You don't know the one I have. And you refused to prove you had it. You can asked "becca". I can send her my copy and, at the same time, you send her yours. Let's see who is the REAL LIAR. Wanna call me on it? Here is your chance, "never-spanked" boy. I DARE YOU! I DOUBLE DARE YOU! Here is your chance to prove that I am a liar to "becca". She will applaud you for it. Go ahead, Ignoranus Kane0. Make my day! ;-) Ask for the study, but be sure to mention your activities here. I believe I pointed out the ng to him when I spoke to him last. Perhaps you can have him vouch for you. Shall I forward this to his email address? You know his email address, don't you? ;-) Yep. Send it to him. I'd love to see him come here and deal with you. I thought you know him. Why don't you call him and invite him? ;-) Doan Doan But thanks for the obvious repeated attempt to dodge, Aline. Sure, Ignoranus Kane0. I'll you Dr. Embry will have a laugh when he read this. ;-) Send it. I will! Doan Doan Kane |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Kids should work... | bobb | General | 108 | December 15th 03 04:23 PM |
Kids should work... | Doan | Spanking | 33 | December 10th 03 09:05 PM |
| | Kids should work... | Kane | Foster Parents | 3 | December 9th 03 12:53 AM |
Kids should work. | ChrisScaife | Foster Parents | 16 | December 7th 03 05:27 AM |
Kids should work... | Doan | Foster Parents | 31 | December 7th 03 04:01 AM |