If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
TN - Child support termination bill attacked
"Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] . . "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Chris" wrote in message ... -- [Any man that's good enough to support a child is good enough to have custody of such child] . . "teachrmama" wrote in message ... "Bob Whiteside" wrote in message ... "Dusty" wrote in message ... "Yet you want to punish a child as the result of an adulterous situation," said Briley. "You put the child in the position of bearing the burden of a parent's conduct." I just don't get this argument. Isn't this politician saying CS money is more important than factual reality and truth should be ignored when there are signs of immorality? To accept this argument one has to ignore it is the mother who gets pregnant as the result of her sexual misconduct outside of a relationship or with multiple partners and believe the biological father should have no responsibility. You really have to use pretzel logic to advocate for the status quo when it comes to obvious inequities in CS law. The whole idea is so disgusting!! As if a child is owed money from a man--any man--and to not receive the money from whatever man mom points to is child abuse! Where do these idiot politicians get their ideas? You've got to wonder if the lot of them have children by "outside interests" where other men are paying what they, themselves, should be paying. The above is a classic response from one who does not understand the relationship between rights and responsibilities. What? You are NUTS, Chris! I said I think it is ridiculous that the law says that a child is owed money by a man--any man--whether he is the father or not. You also said "...what they, themselves, should be paying." What I said is that, perhaps, the politicians keep the laws the way they are because they (the politicians) know that they could be the fathers of some of these children who are being discovered not to be the children of the men who have been told by the moms that they are the fathers. If the politicians change the law to say that nonbio dads do not have to continue to pay, then maybe the politicians themselves will be forced to pay for the results of their "consultations" with "constituents." |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FL: Child-support bill clears panel | Dusty | Child Support | 2 | April 15th 06 10:49 PM |
CO: Bill Would Take Casino Winnings To Pay Child Support | Dusty | Child Support | 7 | April 6th 06 05:53 AM |
SC: Man ordered to pay 28-year-old child support bill or go to jail | Dusty | Child Support | 22 | January 26th 06 07:44 PM |
FL: Governor Signs Child Support, Paternity Bill | Dusty | Child Support | 2 | May 24th 05 02:17 AM |
LA: Bill would criminalize non-payment of child support | Dusty | Child Support | 28 | June 23rd 04 04:11 AM |